The 51st state?
PEDRO Pierluisi, Puerto Rico’s resident commissioner, who acts as the island’s representative to the executive branch and in Congress — where he can vote in committee, though not on the House floor — says that action is needed.
On Nov. 14, he gave a speech on the House floor offering a compelling defense of both the process and the results of the Nov. 6 plebiscite. Mr. Pierluisi, who is pro-statehood, correctly called the island’s current status “colonial in nature” and made a forceful argument against those who would dismiss the election’s outcome. “Some wish to downplay the results of the plebiscite by citing the voters who left the second question blank, but this argument does not withstand scrutiny,” he said. “In our democracy, outcomes are determined by ballots properly cast. Power rests with the citizen who votes, not the one who stays home or refuses to choose from among the options provided.”
I had a long conversation with Mr. Pierluisi the day after he spoke on the House floor. He insists that either Congress or the Obama administration should respect the plebiscite and take action — perhaps by creating another, improved plebiscite that includes both the current commonwealth status as an option, and clearer, fuller explanations of what the alternatives would mean.
He hopes public pressure, including from other Hispanic voters, and possibly international prodding, encourages Congress or the White House to act. “If Congress doesn’t do anything with this,” he told me, “I don’t rule out going to the United Nations or the Organization of American States.” Mr. Pierluisi won’t do so immediately, he said, “because I have to believe in Congress doing its job.”








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Yes, just what we need–another guaranteed blue state complete with 2 senators, 3-4 house members, and electoral college votes for Democrats. Why not just formally dissolve the GOP & be done with it?
Outlander on November 25, 2012 at 10:10 AM
Wouldn’t Puerto Rico be the 58th state?
bgibbs1000 on November 25, 2012 at 10:13 AM
I approve of Puerto Rico becoming a state or going independant.
BigGator5 on November 25, 2012 at 10:13 AM
If I have to hear the word “Latino” for the next 4 years my head is going to explode. If you want to be referred to “Latino” find another country…we are Americans. Some from German descent, some from Asian descent, some from Italian descent but now we are Americans.
trs on November 25, 2012 at 10:14 AM
Welcome aboard the Titanic, Puerto Rico.
justltl on November 25, 2012 at 10:24 AM
Here’s where Romney’s “47 percent” comment is really going to come into play. Puerto Rico voters in the past had rejected statehood because their commonwealth status allowed them many benefits of U.S. citizenship, such as unrestricted travel to and from the continent and government benefit programs, without the requirement to pay income tax. In short, they gained more economically from not being a state than from seeking statehood status.
But once you get to the situation where half the voters are not paying any income taxes, than they have no reason not to oppose statehood — they’re not paying federal taxes now, and they won’t be paying them if Puerto Rico becomes the 51st State. It wouldn’t be a shock to see the Democrats use this as a wedge issue with Hispanic voters, especially in the run-up to 2016, but it would probably do the Republicans well to add up the number of people on the island who — based on current demographics — won’t be paying a dime in federal taxes under the statehood plan.
Based on current economic income levels, it wouldn’t be a shock if that number came to over 50 percent of the adult voting population. If that’s the case, there may still be enough voters in enough states grouchy enough about taking on that sort of something-for-nothing subsidy to make it at least a mid-term election negative for anyone pushing the Puerto Rico statehood issue in 2014.
jon1979 on November 25, 2012 at 10:25 AM
Republicans should insist that one condition of statehood for Puerto Rico would be that for the first time in a century we increase the House of Representatives. Let’s say we added 15 seats to make it a nice even 450. Most of the population increase now is going to red states–last census Texas picked up four seats, GA,SC, UT, and AZ each added one. Meanwhile it was the old blue states like Ohio and Michigan that lost seats. So if the GOP plays it correctly, the Republican candidate for president could actually increase his electoral total due to the addition of Puerto Rico.
radjah shelduck on November 25, 2012 at 10:25 AM
Of course they want statehood, why not? They’ll chomp down on those sweet sweet bennies and subsidies for at least a few years before financial armageddon. And they’ll vote 80% democrat.
What a great idea.
Next up Guam.
CorporatePiggy on November 25, 2012 at 10:29 AM
It would be state number 62. Everyone gets that wrong.
The quote
Let me math it out for ya.
57 plus one to go = 58
58 + Alaska and Hawaii which he wasn’t allowed to go to = 61
So that would make PR state number 62 not state number 58.
Frank Enstine on November 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM
Your math is terrible.
CoffeeMan on November 25, 2012 at 10:40 AM
Isn’t independence an option?
Akzed on November 25, 2012 at 10:48 AM
It’s as good as BOs. Who’s going to quibble over a small error like that. Beside I know for a fact the the phantom state is a red state.
OKay! It would be the 61st state and not the 62nd. Big deal it’s not like I’m a highly educated scientist or anything. Oh wait…. Good thing I live and work in MA and my boss and co-workers are libs who would never come here anyway. Heck they all voted for Warren and beleive in CAGW so it just shows you that we scientist types aren’t very bright anyway.
Frank Enstine on November 25, 2012 at 10:48 AM
I’ve long believed that Puerto Rico should be given the choice of statehood or independence – with no third option. So if they do choose statehood I’ll welcome them aboard this listing ship despite the potential political consequences. I’d also like to take a second look at Guam, the American Samoa, US Virgin Islands and the Northern Mariana Islands to see if either of these options are possible.
One more thing, good idea from above about increasing House seats even though the thought of adding more politicians in Washington is… unsettling.
JohnAGJ on November 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM
We already have a 51st state. That would be Bernakansas (AKA the Fed). It is responsible for 22% of federal revenue and 8% of GDP. If its world-renowned printing presses ever shut down, we’re in big trouble!
shuzilla on November 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM
Didn’t BHO prophesy the no. of states? So it shall be written, so it shall be done. /s
tommy71 on November 25, 2012 at 11:08 AM
Actually, Puerto Rico will become both the 61st and the 62nd state- Puerto 61 and Rico 62.
So you were correct the first time.
justltl on November 25, 2012 at 11:12 AM
No. I vehemently object to a 51st state on grounds that it would totally screw up our flag.
ButterflyDragon on November 25, 2012 at 11:15 AM
I thought Mexico was the 51st state?
moonsbreath on November 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM
D.C. is slated to become states number 63 through 70.
Georgetown University will be state number 71. Its state bird will be the condom.
justltl on November 25, 2012 at 11:20 AM
From what I read it will be the middle finger.
Frank Enstine on November 25, 2012 at 11:46 AM
Yeah, we need another welfare state… all part of the plan to kill any wealth except for those in the politburo… why don’t we just cut them loose, they can sneak over the border like everyone else for the freebies.
rgranger on November 25, 2012 at 12:39 PM
I think it’s kind of funny (if not stupid) that Puerto Rico’s elite wants to be dominated by Washington and thinks it will make out good under the thumb of the political ruling class.
Punchenko on November 25, 2012 at 12:42 PM
They have it made now…all the bennies, with no duties…fools.
Schadenfreude on November 25, 2012 at 12:59 PM