Planning for China’s fall
5. No new ideas. Perhaps of greatest concern is that Mr. Xi and his six colleagues that comprise the new Standing Committee do not have records of pushing reforms and do not seem particularly cosmopolitan. While it is unrealistic to expect the Communist Party to elevate to senior positions anyone not totally loyal to it and its control over the Chinese populace, it does need to find leaders with ideas and solutions to all of the various problems listed above. Unfortunately, Mr. Xi and his co-leaders are likely to come under pressure from elites worried about protecting their parochial interests and commoners angry at corruption and a declining standard of living. In response, it remains unlikely that the new leaders will embrace any type of meaningful reform for fear of losing political control (à la Mikhail Gorbachev in the Soviet Union 25 years ago). Given that President Hu Jintao presided over a slowdown in the growth of the private sector and a return to greater emphasis on state owned enterprises, what ideas does Mr. Xi have for ensuring continued economic growth or responding to citizens’ dissatisfaction with inefficient local government rule and continuing repression? What is Mr. Xi’s strategy for dealing with China’s problems and what type of vision does he have for the country over the next 10 or 25 years?
Should China’s new leadership merely muddle along for the next decade, then the next turnover of power in 2022 may take place under much more unsettled and less promising conditions. How will the PLA respond to a China that is growing weaker on the world stage or one whose goals are being frustrated by other nations? Will the leadership stick together if growth continues to slow or debt loads increase such that financial crises plague the nation in the coming years? These are questions to which Western and Asian governments should be paying close attention, and they should be figuring out which metrics are most important for understanding China’s current trajectory. Given the amount of information coming out of the country regarding potential problems, there is no excuse for being caught flat-footed or misinterpreting current trends. With the level of economic integration between China and the rest of the world, and the growing strength of China’s military, any disruption, weakness, or collapse emanating from Beijing will have profound repercussions across the globe.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
This is how I remember it…a few decades ago.
Japan was going to buy all of America, they bought all of Las Angeles it seems they owned it all, and an almost panic about how Japan was going to buy and own all of the U.S…5 or 6 years later, the developers bought almost all of the real estate and building back for pennies on the dollar. Japan was almost bankrupt, and our businessmen, the ones more “stupid” than their Japanese counter parts seemed to have made a fortune both ways, selling high, and buying back low.
The fact is, no one is more brilliant than our business leaders, which is why even with the goof balls we elect, our economy still keeps chugging alone…even with what Obama has done, which would destroy most any other country, we will survive because our business leaders are smarter than our political leaders…the problem is, the masses have to suffer until we dump the political leaders we have now.
China will crumble, just like Japan did…and we will rise to the top again, as we purge the political leaders…we have started it with the Governors, and the House, now onto the Senate and the White House…
right2bright on November 25, 2012 at 5:46 PM
Who needs new ideas when you have the Gospels according to Comrades Karl, Vladimir, Iosef, and Zedong?
Blacksmith on November 25, 2012 at 5:46 PM
As long as someone on Earth produces the intellectual property for the Chinese pirates to steal they’ll manage.
profitsbeard on November 25, 2012 at 5:54 PM
Right on!
thebrokenrattle on November 25, 2012 at 5:57 PM
IF, in ten years, Russia is more affluent than China, we might have a little bitty problem.
OldEnglish on November 25, 2012 at 6:00 PM
Didn’t we just read how China was the next all-around super power?
davidk on November 25, 2012 at 6:12 PM
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/24/do-you-really-want-a-democratic-china/
davidk on November 25, 2012 at 6:13 PM
Is this from the same crowd that told us in 1962 that Castro would fall in less than ten years?
platypus on November 25, 2012 at 6:14 PM
A guy can dream, but China will not fall. They did okay when all they had were rice paddies. And they are never going back to just that. Thanks to us. We outsourced all our manufacturing to them. That is not coming back. This weekend I went to look for winter boots. I tried to avoid buying anything made in China. I don’t like patronizing communist regimes. I thought I’d have to go barefoot as everything in the store said Maid In China. Eventually I found a pair made in Bangladesh.
keep the change on November 25, 2012 at 6:14 PM
Please, our “business leaders” are myopic fools who would bail out of America WTSHTF.
ninjapirate on November 25, 2012 at 6:16 PM
Yep. The tale as told by the tape:
Nikkei Dec, 1989: 39,500
Nikkei Nov, 2012: 9,370
23 years, -66% return
So much for the long-term Japanese investor
Of course … the Shanghai Composite hit 6000 back in 2008 and is down to 2000, now – with lots more to go down once that joke economy implodes.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on November 25, 2012 at 6:28 PM
Ahhh..the good old days.
But what if there’s a new kind of pig at the trough this time..one who changes the rules and has a plan of purposely destroying the economy and has the audacity to do it?
Mimzey on November 25, 2012 at 6:50 PM
And the same thing can not happen here..or to the global economy because_______?
Mimzey on November 25, 2012 at 6:52 PM
Depends on whether our socialists crash us enough that China isn’t weak by comparison.
Count to 10 on November 25, 2012 at 7:29 PM