Ad hominem yet again.

“A core of decency”? Oh come on.

Although amusing. “My station in life”? Do you know what Shakespeare said about lawyers?

Wethal on November 24, 2012 at 5:42 PM

No core philosophy. Oh come on. You sound like an uneducated punk.

You mean to say you don’t understand the meaning of the expression: Let’s kill all the lawyers.

moron, or a liar, to claim not to have known about Romney’s conservative agenda

Your description of Romney as having no core philosophy reveals you as lacking a core of decency. And you play fast and lose with the facts. Your comments are unworthy of someone in your station in life.

Basilsbest on November 24, 2012 at 5:36 PM

Ad hominem yet again.

“A core of decency”? Oh come on.

Although amusing. “My station in life”? Do you know what Shakespeare said about lawyers?

Calling people “stupid, morons, thick or liars” or lacking in “brains or humility” because they disagree with you is not “setting the record straight.”

Name-calling says something about the name-caller, and not about the recipient of the pejoratives.

Wethal on November 24, 2012 at 5:00 PM

You said this about a man who worked his butt off against all odds to save us from that incompetent thug.

Of course this is what heppens with a candidate who has no clear governing philosophy, and hires someone to write a philosophy for him. It was “tell me what I should say I believe,” as opposed to “This is what I believe; how can I communicate it to the voters.?” Wethal on November 24, 2012 at 3:10 PM

I didn’t call you a moron because you said something which with I disagreed. I said you would have to be a moron, or a liar, to claim not to have known about Romney’s conservative agenda

Your description of Romney as having no core philosophy reveals you as lacking a core of decency. And you play fast and lose with the facts. Your comments are unworthy of someone in your station in life.

Communication is a two way street. I heard him loud and clear. Either you didn’t listen or you are a liar.

Basilsbest on November 24, 2012 at 4:55 PM

I’ve been practicing law in Philly for over 30 years, so I’d say I was pretty good at communicating and listening. Can’t be a litigator without them.

Overall, we are in a LOT better shape after 2012 than we were after 2008. Obama’s coattails shrank. We are looking pretty good for 2014 in my opinion.

crosspatch on November 24, 2012 at 4:18 PM

Have you ever been in a real fight? I mean one where somebody was going to end up arrested or seriously hurt? Most people have not.

When you’re in a real fight, this happy-talk crap won’t work. To walk away or get away you have to be gravely honest with yourself about what you’re willing to do in that moment. Then do it.

What you’re doing does not work. It’s BS. Stop. It doesn’t help. And it really makes you sound like a whiny-loser.

Unless people are willing to admit to major flaws Until there is real change on the right and not just massaging the same dying-limbs the party will continue to diminish at approximately the same pace that white-Americans become the minority.

Complaining about a leak is not going to help when the ship is sinking. Fixing it now will. Your comments reflect the typical lame and useless response which I’ve heard.

Planning on the Dems to fail says VERY LITTLE about your hopes for the GOP. What ideas do you have that every person on this blog can walk away with and implement today?

Yeah, I don’t have an idea either. It’s not easy. But your easy-street BS isn’t going to work either. Waiting for the other team to fail is not an offensive strategy.

Disputing your stupid accusations are not ad hominems. It is setting the record straight, with gusto. Romney laid out a clear agenda to anyone with the humility and brains to listen.

Basilsbest on November 24, 2012 at 4:51 PM

Calling people “stupid, morons, thick or liars” or lacking in “brains or humility” because they disagree with you is not “setting the record straight.”

Name-calling says something about the name-caller, and not about the recipient of the pejoratives.

Firstly Romney offered plenty of inspiration to anyone who isn’t a moron.

Secondly, any member of your imaginary base who had to be inspired to vote against Obama is too incompetent to vote.

Basilsbest on November 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM

Says you. Like most things, views diverge.

You, being a sycophantic nut case of Romney Worshiping certainly felt inspired.

Not one person I know personally voted happily for Romney. None were inspired. Several Republican fellow employees did not even go out and vote. At least 3 of them participated in the Primary and voted for people other than Romney in it.

When I did events for Romney, the people I did door to door contacts with said they were certain to vote Romney, but none of them seems excited. They talked more about fear of Obama. The people at another event only 4 or 5 seemed keen on Romney, the other 7 or so people I talked to were there with antipathy towards Obama. The night of the first Debate, I talked to about 30 total people, some before, some after. Those before were concerned he would come out looking bad, they thought Obama was going to damage him. Those after the debate were surprised by his performance and mostly his professed positions. Mostly they were happy he effectively beat up Obama and Obama came out looking weak. None really talked about how excited they were to vote for Romney and his positions.

Obama was the most effective inspiration for Romney voters that I noticed in North Carolina. I am not sure who he might have inspired other than sycophants who are prone to insanity.

I live in the Philadelphia area media market, and all we saw here from Romney and American Crossroads for weeks, was “The economy is baaaad, but it could be better, somehow, with Romney.”

If the issues you mention were indeed his positions, which they probably were, he never communicated them effectively.

Wethal on November 24, 2012 at 4:40 PM

Communication is a two way street. I heard him loud and clear. Either you didn’t listen or you are a liar.

to the voters.?” Wethal on November 24, 2012 at 3:10 PM
Romney’s conservative governing philosophy was told to you many times over the course of the campaign. You are thick. Or a liar.
Basilsbest on November 24, 2012 at 4:38 PM

Ad hominem yet again.

Wethal on November 24, 2012 at 4:42 PM

Disputing your stupid accusations are not ad hominems. It is setting the record straight, with gusto. Romney laid out a clear agenda to anyone with the humility and brains to listen.

Too incompetent to inspire the base beyond vote against Obama. (Vote for me, at least I am not a Marxist, socialist light sure, marxist, No.)

Firstly Romney offered plenty of inspiration to anyone who isn’t a moron.

Secondly, any member of your imaginary base who had to be inspired to vote against Obama is too incompetent to vote.