No sex? Permission to speak freely, sir
I was a part of the Iraq invasion in 2003. At the time, I was a naive, 24-year-old lieutenant and still a virgin (because of my former Jesus obsession and aversion to cadet marching). I assumed General Order No. 1 would have no impact on my life. I was wrong.
I had no idea that a combat zone would be such a sexually charged environment. Blame it on amped-up testosterone pouring out of aggressive, athletic men. Or blame it on combat stripping even the strongest of men and women down to their core, raw emotions. Combine that with forming special bonds with comrades who promise to do whatever it takes to ensure your safe return home, including sacrificing their life for yours. What do you think happens?
Let me tell you, covert combat sex (or in my case, hard-core making out, because I was too scared to go “All-In”) ranks high on the list of life’s thrills. I’m a comfortable civilian now, and I know it’s impossible to inject that intense passion back into my life. But I reflect on it almost every day. There’s nothing that compares to making love at war.
What would I do if I were in charge? I’d abolish General Order No. 1. Keep the rules that protect soldiers from sexual harassment. But allow deployed officers and troops to have sex while at war. West Point should come to its senses as well.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
But allow deployed officers and troops to have sex while at war.
Oh, yes, for unmarried soldiers. Rings so true for me.
petefrt on November 24, 2012 at 9:01 PM
Yikes. It gives “in action” a whole new meaning.
viking01 on November 24, 2012 at 9:02 PM
Well let’s face it folks, how long have soldiers abroad been *ahem* fraternizing with the locals, morals and religion or NO morals and religion? 2000 years at least?
MelonCollie on November 24, 2012 at 9:05 PM
And the troops should have free cigarettes afterwards too!
But seriously, bonding privileges for these guys may strengthen them, and strengthen our military too.
I’m not certain about it, but I certainly lean that way.
petefrt on November 24, 2012 at 9:09 PM
Translation – I’m not quite 35 years old and the rules need to change because they don’t suit me…
Bradky on November 24, 2012 at 9:13 PM
Good summary.
It was a pathetic article.
56andwarmweather on November 24, 2012 at 9:17 PM
♫♪ Officer Laura give me the news…
I gotta bad case of loving you.
No drill is gonna cure my ill,
I gotta bad case of loving you,
Taking the hill won’t cure my ill,
I gotta bad ca-yase of lo-oooving you. ♪♫
viking01 on November 24, 2012 at 9:20 PM
deployed
embedded
area of operations
azimuth
ballgame
bad conduct discharge
boo-coo
boom-boom
commanding general
cherry
free strike zone
hump
a.s.f.
Schadenfreude on November 24, 2012 at 9:22 PM
What possible harm could come of the Captain sleeping with a female squad commander who oddly enough never gets sent out on any dangerous patrols? Even more strange is how the guy she was eyeing last week got sent on a patrol in one of the worst areas and caught a bullet.
sharrukin on November 24, 2012 at 9:24 PM
‘Cause getting your head blown off while bumping uglies is, like, a totally cool way to die!
CurtZHP on November 24, 2012 at 9:36 PM
Example 158909 why our country is in decline.
davidk on November 24, 2012 at 9:39 PM
fire in the hole
drop and give me a twenty
target illuminator
breastwork
friendly fire
etc.
viking01 on November 24, 2012 at 9:45 PM
+a bajillion
Any human being who can keep emotion out of sexual relationships has something seriously wrong. And those emotions surrounding sex can be the cause for a lot of corruption in various institutions.
Sekhmet on November 24, 2012 at 9:54 PM
You mean like a CIA director letting a reporter he’s sleeping with use his private E-mail, or General Allen exchanging naughty notes with a financially strapped socialite by the name of Jill Kelley?
What could go wrong?
Why this is a bad idea is currently headline news.
sharrukin on November 24, 2012 at 10:04 PM
I served in the U.S. Navy from 1975 to 1997 and the outrage I feel about this so called “officer” strains even my acquired ability in profanity.
By all means, throw out all requirements of good order and discipline, of respect, of honor and (dare I say it in this age of relativism?) of morality, we’re just out to get laid, and screw like feral dogs.
Either this broad is an idiot or she purposely wrote this opinion as a means to promote her book, probably both.
sanjuro on November 24, 2012 at 10:06 PM
I’m reminded of a king named David who found the wife of one of his soldiers tempting enough that he sent that soldier into a battle from which he did not return. In Lt. Cannon’s world history apparently could never repeat.
viking01 on November 24, 2012 at 10:09 PM
Her statements of “Jesus obsession” and mocking her former virtue as “naive” are suggestive of whom her publisher’s target audience may be. Probably fishing for a Hollyweird screenplay deal.
viking01 on November 24, 2012 at 10:14 PM
When you are captured because you couldn’t do your job due to your ‘sexual attraction’ to the next link in the chain…
… ‘sex‘, if you will call it that, will be the one thing that you won’t have to worry about.
Seven Percent Solution on November 24, 2012 at 10:18 PM
Excellent observation viking01, on target!
sanjuro on November 24, 2012 at 10:19 PM
Pics or it didn’t happen.
dczombie on November 24, 2012 at 11:37 PM
Went to her site, turns out she’s a comedian.
You know like John Stewart…clown nose on, clown nose off.
.
Really what it means is that nothing she says can be taken as true.
.
And now we can laugh at her.
LincolntheHun on November 25, 2012 at 12:09 AM
I would have sworn we were up to at least example 1,000,000.
pannw on November 25, 2012 at 12:52 AM
Abstaining from sex is pretty easy for guys; even in war zones guys typically have to pay for it.
It reads like an argument against women in the military
theblackcommenter on November 25, 2012 at 2:00 AM
Didn’t Rick Santorum get castigated for suggesting that women and men together in combat would cause compromising emotions that would hurt readiness? Hmmm, seems this article is confirming what he was talking about.
cptacek on November 25, 2012 at 2:15 AM