Obama considers corporate funding for inauguration
Four years ago Mr. Obama barred corporations from donating to his inauguration, a gesture meant to show that well-heeled interests wouldn’t have undue influence in his administration. For the 2009 events he raised more than $50 million from other donors to help cover the costs of celebrations.
But the climate is different now. The economy is still struggling, and the president’s campaign donors are drained from a long election season in which they were also asked to help fund the Democratic convention in Charlotte and congressional races.
Obama fundraisers and campaign advisers cite various reasons for accepting corporate money this time around. Dropping the ban on corporate contributions would ease the task of raising the tens of millions of dollars needed to pay for celebratory events that have become a fixture of presidential inaugurations.
They also describe the inauguration as more of a civic event than a partisan political affair.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Oh please! That would be so delicious.
thebrokenrattle on November 23, 2012 at 2:17 PM
Why would he have one at all when they are debating a “fiscal cliff”?
Isn’t it about time we do away with this things anyway?
Rocks on November 23, 2012 at 2:18 PM
Go die.
Akzed on November 23, 2012 at 2:19 PM
What would they get for contributing? O’Care waivers? Taxpayer funding for start ups designed to fail?
I don’t give a damn because I won’t be watching this farce.
Cody1991 on November 23, 2012 at 2:20 PM
Obama should pay for it all out of his own pocket.
Blake on November 23, 2012 at 2:20 PM
Cancel it.
JPeterman on November 23, 2012 at 2:21 PM
I look forward to Penzoil, Firestone, and Geico signs like those surrounding a NASCAR track.
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on November 23, 2012 at 2:21 PM
When he pays for his third one, how about all his minions that donate via the Internet (you know, the guys from China, France, Germany, etc), can pay for it. Maybe a bake sale for his fourth one. For his fifth one, well, it won’t matter by then, anyway. I mean, we’ll be just like North Korea by then, so…. you know.
Warner Todd Huston on November 23, 2012 at 2:21 PM
And I bet almost all of them are foto’s who are giving taxpayers money bho has given to them? I bet union thugs are on the top of the list for giving?
I wouldn’t watch any of this if someone paid me to do so.
L
letget on November 23, 2012 at 2:23 PM
Tax deductible donations, no doubt.
davidk on November 23, 2012 at 2:28 PM
In this economy, the sharia media would have shamed a President Romney into at least going very, very low-key. The boy king? Not so much. I will be paying attention, though, to see which “corporations” think this is something to celebrate.
Rational Thought on November 23, 2012 at 2:30 PM
PLEASE!!! what the populace needs is a nice organized list of companies to boycott, I`ll be the 1st, who wants in?
NY Conservative on November 23, 2012 at 2:32 PM
Hypocrite in Chief
Schadenfreude on November 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM
Oh, did you see the Obamas yesterday, “sacrifishing” in Mrs. Roosevelt fashion?
Me neither.
Schadenfreude on November 23, 2012 at 2:40 PM
May all these people show up and behave exactly the same.
Schadenfreude on November 23, 2012 at 2:41 PM
“There’s a better America possible!” Vote for Obama!
davidk on November 23, 2012 at 2:51 PM
…Because he doesn’t have to be re-elected.
BigGator5 on November 23, 2012 at 3:02 PM
With all the liberal distaste for corporations, this should be delicious. I told my 0bamabot dad we will aim to get his wuv’s approval below Bush’s when he leaves office, and he laughed. I’m laughing now
Sekhmet on November 23, 2012 at 4:35 PM