Comments on: MSNBC chief: “This channel has never been the voice of Obama”

By: Meredith

Meredith — Thu, 22 Nov 2012 18:54:02 +0000

Isn’t this what Peter Wehner was talking about? The fact that the MSM is unabashedly liberal isn’t nearly as troubling as the fact that they truly believe they are unbiased–to the point that they take offense at the suggestion that they don’t play it straight.

I think he compared it to trying to tell someone who drinks too much he/she is an alcoholic. Denial, denial, denial.

Black/cool/far-left liberal Obama has pushed the MSM past the point of no return. There is no hope they will ever behave like real journalists again.

You first have to acknowledge you HAVE a problem before you can fix it. They don’t think they have a problem.

By: landlines

landlines — Thu, 22 Nov 2012 18:20:41 +0000

MSNBC chief: “This channel has never been the voice of Obama”

TRUE: You’re the OTHER END of Obama, engaged in full-time dumping.

By: hawkdriver

hawkdriver — Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:31:41 +0000

Yeah. Say that again without laughing.
http://tv.msnbc.com/2012/11/21/awww-snap-msnbcs-top-10-comebacks-for-use-against-the-family-conservative/

hoosiermama on November 22, 2012 at 11:13 AM

Thanks for posting. I think the defense would rest on that.

By: hawkdriver

hawkdriver — Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:29:13 +0000

That’s like asking Ailes, “Is your channel the voice of Bush” back in 2005. Of course it was, but he’d never admit it publicly.

ernesto on November 22, 2012 at 10:41 AM

Not even close. You’ve just never seen a channel that leans objective compared to the propaganda your liberal channels pump out. Your basic liberal wouldn’t recognize objectivity if it hit them in the head.

By: Schadenfreude

Schadenfreude — Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:20:19 +0000

Goebbels had another orgasm in his grave.

These clowns legitimize him, every day.

By: Marxism is for dummies

Marxism is for dummies — Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:53:13 +0000

Obama’s voice, no… more likely his butt.

By: Night Owl

Night Owl — Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:51:08 +0000

Yeah. Say that again without laughing.
http://tv.msnbc.com/2012/11/21/awww-snap-msnbcs-top-10-comebacks-for-use-against-the-family-conservative/

hoosiermama on November 22, 2012 at 11:13 AM

Good Lord, that is about as lame as Hannity’s plan for dinner with those irritating liberals in our lives.

The only liberal in my family is my sister-in-law. I was planning, if she bragged about Obama winning, to tell her I am just so glad to find out that the American people are happy to pay higher taxes so I can enjoy my retirement, knowing that following generations are apparently happy to foot the bill. I just found out last night that she voted for Romney, because her family has sold a lease for natural gas fracking, and they heard Obama is going to try to put an end to that. LOL

By: kim roy

kim roy — Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:51:07 +0000

If people feel this strongly about it, you could always boycott their sponsors and let them know why you are not buying their product.

I believe some are Starbucks, OralB, Campbell’s Soup.

You know, if people feel strongly about it and actually want to take a stand instead of complain about it.

Starve the beast.

By: Red Cloud

Red Cloud — Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:43:22 +0000

“This channel has never been the voice of Obama. Ever,” Griffin told The Huffington Post. “People want to talk about Fox. Fox is the voice of the Republican Party.”

This is an idiot speaking.

By: Night Owl

Night Owl — Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:43:15 +0000

This is ridiculous, given FOX New’s having created the notion of a cable news “voice” for an administration. This is the kind of silliness I tried to address with my comment.

ernesto on November 22, 2012 at 11:24 AM

Apparently most people don’t agree with you, since FOX News ratings are so much better than MSNBC’s, including among Independents and Democrats. Microsoft was so embarrassed by the association that they made them change their website to make NBC take responsibility for them.