Romney advisor rips GOP officials for turning on him
“The Friday night before the election, we were in Cincinnati for this huge rally … Tens of thousands of people, you could feel the energy, a hundred top-tier Romney surrogates were at the event. I’m backstage with some of them, I won’t mention their names, but they’re talking about Romney like he’s Reagan. ‘His debate performances were the best performances of any Republican nominee in presidential history. He’s iconic.’ They were talking about him because they believed he was going to win in four or five days. And in fact, some of them were already talking to our transition to position themselves for a Romney cabinet.”
“I won’t say who they are,” Senor said. “They know who they are. They were on television, it was unbelievable, it was five, six days later, absolutely eviscerating him.”…
“Many of these officials, I might add, chose to stay out of it, they chose not to run,” Senor said. “And they chose to stay out of it because they believed this race was unwinnable.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Zzzz
Good Lt on November 21, 2012 at 1:31 PM
Mitt Romney? Who’s that?
WeekendAtBernankes on November 21, 2012 at 1:31 PM
Oh I remember, the guy who wanted to ban tampons.
WeekendAtBernankes on November 21, 2012 at 1:32 PM
The irony…LOL
idesign on November 21, 2012 at 1:39 PM
LOL.
The same officials who were changing rules to benefit a Romney?
portlandon on November 21, 2012 at 1:39 PM
Hmmm… Let’s play 20 questions with Dan Senor.. Was the official in question a governor of a southern state? Is said official a minority? Does said official use a nickname that starts with a B? Real subtle there Governor Bobby, especially the angling for the HHS job.
Illinidiva on November 21, 2012 at 1:45 PM
I agree. The ORCA debacle and Romney’s warts notwithstanding, this was an easy call for anyone and voters blew it…again.
People who blame Romney are missing the point: the electorate has changed. Not even Rush is denying this. They’ve been bought or are otherwise apathetic about the direction of the country. Black voters just reelected Jesse Jr near unanimously. You think you’re ever going to persuade them back? Latinos, give them amnesty and they’ll still vote D, only there will be more of them. You think we’re ever going to win the information war in the classrooms and media? Never. You think these people wouldn’t sell the constitution down the river to get whatever they want? It means nothing to them. They do it all the time.
The Count on November 21, 2012 at 1:48 PM
Oh Please Dan! It’s called POLITICS.
yes, they’re all chickensh*t, gutless wonders..
Film at 11.
ToddPA on November 21, 2012 at 1:49 PM
He’s right
gophergirl on November 21, 2012 at 1:51 PM
I’m telling you, Romney is being used as their “political Jesus”. Romney died for their political sins. They are going to heap every bit of political baggage they can think of on Romney and try to make everything his fault.
crosspatch on November 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM
The fact that at least one was probably Jindal doesn’t make Jindal look that great.
Illinidiva on November 21, 2012 at 1:58 PM
And after his third attempt at the White House, he rose up into the heavens to his GOD planet, and those
moronsMormons who believed in him became his sycophantic slaves there.astonerii on November 21, 2012 at 2:00 PM
Frankly, I’m annoyed with all the Romney bashing too, for several reasons.
First, the guy really doesn’t deserve it. Republicans were thrashed across the board, and Romney actually outperformed the field, yet somehow all of this is his fault? Please, the guy worked his butt off for this, and had real momentum near the end. It’s a shame it wasn’t enough, but you cannot say he did an overall good job and should be commended for that at least.
Second, it makes US look bad. Aside from those crazies whom insisted the entire time they wouldn’t vote for him, we as a party have been saying for the better part of the year that this man should be President. After saying this for that long, it makes us look horrible to turn on him so viciously. It makes us look insincere at best, and rabid or crazy at worst.
Third, attacking follow Republicans has got to stop, or at least it has to be more measured in the future. I realize that some more liberal elements in the party need to be weeded out, but until we’re not so badly outnumbered we simply cannot afford much weeding.
Additionally, attacking fellow Republicans is likely a contributing factor to our poor showing this year. Attacks on fellow conservatives only splits the party, and turns off conservative leaning independent voters. Once a conservative is in power, criticism is vital for keeping them honest, but until then we need a unified party, at least until we’re not so badly outnumbered.
Fourth and finally, attacking Romney seems to be a mechanism used for avoiding reality in general. These same people don’t seem to want to admit that demographics are against us, don’t want to admit that a lot of people are only calling for socialism, and that we need to win people over if we’re to have a future. No, for many people it’s easier to just blame Romney and hide their heads in the sand.
Going to reiterate what I’ve said all year. Romney was not a candidate without flaws, but I was willing to forgive that and support him, enthusiastically, for two reasons. The first reason was, simply that he’d be a whole lot better than Obama. The second reason was simply, that Romney was and is a very good and honorable man.
Look, this is an important point to make. I can forgive somebody for a lot if I believe they’re a fundamentally good person. Romney, is clearly a good guy, Obama, well he has his defenders but I don’t think the said could be said of him.
If its a choice between a good man, and a corrupt man, I’ll choose the good man in an instant, even if he has flaws.
WolvenOne on November 21, 2012 at 2:05 PM
I personally think all those politicians are regretting taking the 30 pieces of silver in exchange for promoting the TURD.
Obama was easily defeatable by a semi-competent conservative politician. Perry, Newt, Hell even Bachmann likely would have beaten Obama. They would have been different enough from Obama to have inspired more people to vote. Instead we got a person whose policies for different reasons were nearly a carbon copy list of what Obama did and thus someone who was not able to, let alone willing to attack Obama. Romney found it easy to attack conservatives, not so much Marxist progressive Obama.
astonerii on November 21, 2012 at 2:05 PM
You live by the establishment and you die by it too. Now that Romney’s gone he’s of no further use to them, and they have their own jobs to think about, which is why there’s this desperate effort going on to paint Mitt as some sort of right wing social conservative by our so-called “leadership.”
Doomberg on November 21, 2012 at 2:07 PM
Back-stabbing two-faced politicians shockingly turn out to be back-stabbing and two-faced.
sharrukin on November 21, 2012 at 2:10 PM
Okay, I’m gonna say it. You’re a friggin moron!!!
PERRY!?! The guy whose approval in Texas dropped double digits after the debates? The guy who couldn’t last till Florida during the primaries?! Here’s a little news flash for you, Perry was actually the FAVORED candidate by many in the establishment, at least until his melt-down. He was seen as somebody who could unify the establishment, social conservatives, and tea party.
Frankly, I thought he was gonna win the primaries, right up until the debates. He never ever recovered, and it’s laughable to think he could’ve won the general election after that.
Bachmann, again laughable, she was on top for about two weeks and quickly made herself look too quirky for most voters. She had no real chance of even winning the primaries, let alone the general.
Newt, gadzooks you really are out of touch with reality. How’s the food in that padded room they’ve stuck you in? The man thoroughly destroyed himself the moment he ran into a little turbulence. He couldn’t go a week without saying something nasty that made him sound incredibly unlikable.
Oh, BTW, you’re entire analysis of the election is flawed, and frankly silly. Turns out Romney got more votes than McCain, and in most states did better than Bush in 04. Republican turnout was VERY high, it just so happens Democratic turnout was even higher.
BTW, those states were Romney didn’t do as well as Bush in 04, those were blue states like California.
WolvenOne on November 21, 2012 at 2:15 PM
Quick, call the WAAAAMBULANCE.
That thrashing can be in part due to the lack luster love for Romney. Out performing them does not mean he did not play a part in their defeat. Instead of making the case for a Romney presidency and a conservative federal government, he spent his time shooting at everything that moved and then forgetting about it.
yes, worked hard. Many people work hard for things, but their performance sucks enough they do not get it. Think the 4’3 basketball star who worked hard. Oh, there are none? Well, How about the 500 lb balarina superstar? Nope, there are none. Well, how about the awesome most beloved progressive (R) presidents of the last 80 years? None, not one? Why?
I think you said what you mean in that last sentence in that you cannot say he did a good job. he did not. He did a progressive job. That works great in getting out the democratic vote, not so much for the base vote.
That would be because WE, well, you guys after I change my registration, do suck and should look bad. Given the circumstances of Obama and the Democratic Senate, we should have picked someone conservative and helped restore faith in conservatism across the nation. I am one of the crazies that said he could not win, I am so totally nuts huh? He pretty much lost for the reasons I said he would lose back in January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August and September, October i decided to go ahead and vote after all, to no effect. By the way, the party was not sincere in picking Romney, they picked him not for his ability to be a great President, but because they thought he was electable! That there is pure insincerity.
No, it does not. Attacking fellow Republicans is how we get to a reasonable policy agenda. Not attacking Romney in the primaries is what got us the turd as the nominee. Romney was the only politician there that was off limits to attacks. The moment anyone attacked, the established power brokers tore down the attacker and destroyed them. Romney was the LIBERAL ELEMENT that needed to be weeded out in the primary. By the way, we are not out numbered, we are demoralized because our choices were Marxist vs My views are Progressive.
The largest attacks against Republican candidates came from the liberal wing of the Republican party and aimed at the conservative wing which is the CORE of the party. If you do not have the conservatives, you will win NOTHING, ever.
Demographics are not the problem, they are part of the problem. The problem is the progressive wing of the republican party has reinforced the view that there is hardly a dimes worth of difference between the two parties. Picking Romney only reinforced that idea that there is hardly a dimes worth of difference between the parties. Voted TARP, agreed with TARP, Voted for bailouts, Agreed with bailouts. Passed Romneycare, signed Obama care… the list is legion.
Yeah, he would have been better for the country for 4 to 8 years than Obama. Unfortunately, he would have been a further disaster for Conservatism. He would have ruled as his views and been willing to go along with Democrat proposals. The president taking the blame and the Republican conservative brand taking the damage.
Problem being that Romney supporters throughout the entire election cycle spent their ammunition attacking people like me, instead of getting Romney to do what was needed to earn conservative votes and win the election.
I am sure most of the conservatives like me voted, but they were not compelled to take their friends and family and neighbors along with them, because they were not willing to put their reputations on the line with said voters for someone who was a certainty to betray them after the election.
Romney blew it. It was on him to do the work, it was on his most fervent supporters to get the word out, it was on his campaign to convince enough people to vote for him to win the election, and this election was eminently winnable. He failed, his supporters failed and his campaign failed.
astonerii on November 21, 2012 at 2:28 PM
Wow, and you’ve given me yet another reason not to like you. This is a thoroughly ugly and disgusting comment from a thoroughly ugly and disgusting man.
Seriously, do us a favor and keep your vitriol to yourself.
WolvenOne on November 21, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Romney, the architect of Obamacare? MORON…
There is a LONG ways between February and November. His conservative message would have eventually won the day. Romney’s debate performance did him no great amount of good, did it?
astonerii on November 21, 2012 at 2:30 PM
…and all the GOP officials and all of their cronies billions couldn’t put Humpty Romney back together again.
FloatingRock on November 21, 2012 at 2:31 PM
FYI, here are the vote totals as of this afternoon:
Romney 2012: 59.944 million
McCain 2008: 59.948 million
So Romney and McCain received basically the same number of votes.
diditagain on November 21, 2012 at 2:35 PM
The voting age population increased between 2008 and 2012, so too should have Romney’s vote total. Those votes are missing. About 2.4 million missing voters just for population growth. He failed to win. My view of the election looks pretty spot on, compared with the Romney is electable crowd.
astonerii on November 21, 2012 at 2:39 PM
Growing voter population…
astonerii on November 21, 2012 at 2:39 PM
So Romney couldn’t do any better than John McCain even with Obama being saddled with a poor economy, scandals galore, and disenchantment from the left?
John McCain ran a better campaign than Romney, and McCain did a terrible job.
sharrukin on November 21, 2012 at 2:40 PM
Romney seems like a nice guy overall. However, it’s hard to feel bad for him- his camp has a record of using “anonymous sources” to bash other candidates, is certainly willing to criticize competitors, etc.
Live by the sword, die by the sword…
(shrug)
cs89 on November 21, 2012 at 2:40 PM
Yes, way worse than what Romney supporters threw around here during the primary and election…
You should grow up and learn to win arguments. Something Romney never accomplished.
astonerii on November 21, 2012 at 2:41 PM
Oh, this idiocy again. The exact same argument I’ve been hearing out of you since the primaries. This argument couldn’t keep Romney from winning the primaries, and in the general was only brought up in the first debate which Romney thoroughly WON!
Fact of the matter is, this had absolutely, positively, NOTHING to do with Romney losing. Republican turnout was BETTER overall than in 2008 or 2004. The numbers are publicly available if you don’t believe me.
He lost, because, democrats outnumbered Republican, period. Not because of Obamacare, not because he didn’t have the approval of spiteful little idiots like you, but because the nation has drifted towards socialism and we’re outnumbered.
So go ahead, keep lying to yourself, keep blaming Romney. If it helps you sleep better at night than by all means.
WolvenOne on November 21, 2012 at 2:43 PM
And what were you arguing with that statement? That Mormons are fools and slaves? That’s not an argument you idiot, that is essentially hate speech!!
WolvenOne on November 21, 2012 at 2:45 PM
WolvenOne
Your posts are well reasoned, however it is impossible to reason with people like stoner and sharrukin. If I were an Independent and came to this site I would be put off with their hate. Mitt Romney is an exemplary man who would have given us a principled and much more conservative government than Obama and likely more conservative than any of those who are nominated in future.
Demographics and culture are working against us. Romney had to walk a tightrope. The irony is that having lost with a man as conservative as Romney, the party will move to the left to try to capture the center. As an example Republicans are now referring to illegal aliens as undocumented immigrants.
Do you have a quick link to the final (or current) vote totals?
Basilsbest on November 21, 2012 at 2:49 PM
Nope, that Romney supporters are insane. read the whole thing and stop being a MORON.
Now go shame yourself in some appropriate for your low intelligence way.
astonerii on November 21, 2012 at 2:51 PM
Let the party do that. It will go up in flames sooner than expected. And Romney had to walk a tightrope? Please. You had actualy unemployment in the teens, economic stagnation and ineptitude — while Romney was being touted as the HyperElectable Saviour Of Us All And A Shoo In Because Ham Sandwich Could Beat Obama (As Long As It’s Not Sarah Palin).
ddrintn on November 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM
Ridiculous. No one in their right mind believes that. Romney ran ahead of his party and not only won the debates, he demolished Obama in the first debate. Most of us here were so impressed with his campaign we were predicting a landslide. You refuse to accept the fact America is drifting to the left. The Republican Party can’t afford to give a platform to morons who refuse to accept the will of the majority in the nominating process.
Basilsbest on November 21, 2012 at 2:58 PM
This just highlights the disconnect between all these high-level Romney campaign people and the grassroots. At least in Ohio, virtually everyone I talked to thought the Romney campaign was distant, poorly run, and uninterested in the kind of “retail politics” needed to win the state. The campaign would send out e-mails claiming to be making millions of “voter contacts” but nobody on the ground could find anyone who had actually been “contacted” by the campaign. Very strange.
Outlander on November 21, 2012 at 2:59 PM
It is just as likely Romney brought down the other Republicans. He did run a worse campaign. ORCA fiasco alone makes that a SIMPLE FACT that is TRUE.
astonerii on November 21, 2012 at 3:00 PM
You don’t get that Obama was, in their minds, offering them refuge from the poor economy. They chose his offerings rather than Romney’s challenges. They chose socialism over free enterprise.
Basilsbest on November 21, 2012 at 3:02 PM
When you consider that Obama had one opponent (Romney) and Romney had two opponents (Obama and the media), it’s remarkable that Romney got as close as he did.
They also now refer to liberals as progressives. Take some more marching orders from liberals, now.
Moesart on November 21, 2012 at 3:03 PM
I think you post highlights the problem here. The only thing you can highlight about Romney’s campaign was his debate performances. And frankly, while I thought Romney beat Obama in the first debate, he only did so because of how weak Obama came off and not by any debating brilliance. This was evidenced by the fact that when Obama actually woke up in the second and third debates, he beat and/or tied Romney both times. I also thought that Biden beat Ryan, but the “win” was negated by the fact that Biden resorted to schoolyard bully tactics in the debate.
Can you show me effective advertising/messaging? Effective ground game? Issue framing? Anything else?
Outlander on November 21, 2012 at 3:05 PM
He didn’t do any better than McCain when McCain faced a much tougher battle against the brand new Obama, an economic collapse, Bush fatigue, ongoing wars, and a massive leftist turnout.
Romney is struggling to match McCain’s pathetic performance.
sharrukin on November 21, 2012 at 3:06 PM
Obama’s coattails had nothing to do with the Senate losses in Montana, Missouri, or Indiana, and likely nothing to do with the Senate loss in Ohio. Those were just bad Senate candidates.
ORCA did not lose the race for Romney. Romney’s lack of a ground game overall I think did him in, and ORCA was just emblematic of how bad his approach was.
Outlander on November 21, 2012 at 3:07 PM
No, they chose Dem over Dem Lite as they usually do. Don’t blame the voters when they don’t have a clear choice. This was as predictable as the sun rising in the east every morning.
ddrintn on November 21, 2012 at 3:08 PM
And Romney’s lack of a ground game is a reflection of what a weak candidate he was, despite all the propaganda for the past few years from his ‘bot squads.
ddrintn on November 21, 2012 at 3:10 PM
It’s off the front page now, but I will chime in nevertheless.
The Republican politicos criticizing Romney were not laying into him because he wasn’t conservative enough. We conservatives may have felt that way, but you will note that the poobahs are not saying that Romney didn’t reach out to us. The poobahs are angry because he didn’t chastise us enough and he didn’t “reach out” more aggressively to appease those special interest groups of the Left.
onlineanalyst on November 21, 2012 at 3:39 PM
I did not say it cost him the race, although it might have. According to the numbers, it is only a few hundred thousand votes in the swing states that cost Romney the election. So, it is possible it cost him the election.
But what it does show is his incompetence in running a campaign for election. Something that was a point on someones argument against Romney in the Primary. Romney did not win the primary because of his campaigning, Romney won by default once his establishment power brokers destroyed all the remaining candidates through viscous attacks that were totally out of line with reality. Case in point Newt getting Nuked right before the Florida Primary by so called conservative media power brokers.
astonerii on November 21, 2012 at 3:42 PM
No disagreement here. Romney really didn’t run, in my opinion, a positive, issues-oriented campaign. In the primaries, he just ran as the “only reasonable, electable candidate.” This resulted in a 6 month backlash by Republican primary voters who cycled through an endless succession of “not-Romney” candidates until finally throwing in the towel. That backlash, in turn, depleted Romney’s campaign coffers and prohibited him from counteracting the $90 million in attack ads Obama ran all summer.
Then in the general, he ran this very impersonal and hollow campaign. His entire message was “Obama is a failure and I am a businessman who can create jobs, elect me!” But he didn’t articulate a compelling case for WHY Obama’s policies are responsible for the slow recovery (as opposed to the enormity of the recession as Obama argued and as 60% of voters agreed with), nor did he make a compelling case for how he was going to cut taxes, raise defense spending, restore the $700 billion to Medicare, and still balance the budget. And as we discussed, his campaign never connected with Republican grassroots organizers and ran a very ineffective ground campaign as a result.
Outlander on November 21, 2012 at 3:52 PM
Good point. Very good point.
SparkPlug on November 22, 2012 at 12:57 AM