John Ekdahl
Post-election state-by-state trend analysis (with maps!)
As you can see, only five states moved in Obama’s direction and there are explanations for each.
New Jersey and New York: This is probably the result of a Sandy bounce.
Louisiana and Mississippi: Unless there is a broader trend I’m missing, this is most likely not so much movement in 2012 but instead urban voters still displaced from Hurricane Katrina in 2008 that had finally returned home by this election. That could be wrong, but that’s my guess.
Alaska: Sarah Palin bounce in 2008. Interestingly, Arizona did not see a similar crash in 2012.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I liked it. But I wouldn’t call it a trend so much as a slacking of the newness of the lightbringer in 2008.
cozmo on November 21, 2012 at 11:31 PM
Reason why GOP is not investhttp://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/11/21/teaparty/vote-fraud-must-gop-let-happen/igating voter fraud:
davidk on November 22, 2012 at 12:09 AM
Fixed.
davidk on November 22, 2012 at 12:11 AM
Awesome maps. But positive-trending news is only as good as the people running for future office in those leaning states. Re: the 3 of 4 Senate seats lost in “yay!” Red hotspots? I do wish Monsieur Ace would have gone into more depth about how the map reconciles this instead of simply laying out the bodies for voters to ask why.
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on November 22, 2012 at 5:42 AM