Like the Honey Badger, the sluts at Slate don’t care.

Besides Petraeus is a useless preening dick.

UCMJ Article 134
(1) That the accused wrongfully had sexual intercourse with a certain person;

(2) That, at the time, the accused or the other person was married to someone else; and

(3) That, under the circumstances, the conduct of the accused was to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.
Even if you could claim that nothing happened while Gen Petraeus was in uniform, the CIA still has probations on adultery, as well as the Office of Professional Responsibility, and adultery is one of the reasons why one can lose their security clearance.

It happened in Afghanistan, Emily, when he was still under UCMJ and he still is today because he receives a pension. The Clinton precedent is not workable when the “other woman” has all sorts of technology to pass along classified information through photos, recordings, videos, etc. Real moral courage would be for Obama to announce that Clinton’s behavior (getting away with it) set our country on a horrible course in terms of the morality of our politicians and our national security, but that is not what you had in mind for a Nixon-like “China moment.” Moral courage and Obama do not belong in the same sentence.

PLEASE.

What’s wrong with expecting our “leaders” to exhibit some sort of moral compass?

If they can’t be trusted to do the right thing for others in their personal lives, what should make us believe they should be trusted to do the right thing for others in their professional lives?

Because Obama is a man with such a blemish-free private life

Reggie Love left in thime…

The media were/are in Obama’s azz. It’s not Beluga caviar that you eat, you swine.

Because Obama is a man with such a blemish-free private life

And we know that because all the investigative journolists have been dogging him so thoroughly for so many years?