Bring back Petraeus
Because Obama is a man with such a blemish-free private life, this could be a “Nixon in China” moment. It would be impossible for a Bill Clinton, say, to strike such a blow for sexual sanity. But given that even that insatiable sex fiend is back in the arena and much revered (by some), surely that means we have grown up enough to realize that just because you’re in public life doesn’t mean every aspect of your marriage is fair game. Yes, it’s been titillating to read the farcical details of Petraeus’ fling, and no one got more vicarious pleasure than I. But in the end the Petraeus so-called scandal is just the old story of a long-married man who strayed with a younger woman, a woman who unfortunately for all went a little nuts. I hope that for none of the participants it’s a marriage ender, but it certainly should not have been a career ender. …
But thanks to our ever-faster cycle of humiliation and rehabilitation, he has already been punished and paroled. It’s time to let Petraeus get back to work. It would probably even please Mrs. Petraeus to see less of him around the house right now.
Petraeus has already engaged the services of Robert Barnett, the Washington lawyer who gets former government officials seven-figure book deals. The word is that no book is planned, but surely Petraeus must want to tell his own version of his life. Let’s hope that Obama keeps Petraeus from embarking on this next chapter by asking him to return and finish the job he started.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Why? Because Petraeus is so indispensable? As DeGaulle said: the cemeteries are full of indispensable men.
Travis Bickle on November 21, 2012 at 10:59 AM
Why would Obama want to bring back one of his own fall guys? There’s a reason Holder claims he didn’t advise the White House about the scandal until the evening of November 6th. What else was happening that day, anyway?
JeremiahJohnson on November 21, 2012 at 11:03 AM
Bring him back to testify in public.
forest on November 21, 2012 at 11:05 AM
And we know that because all the investigative journolists have been dogging him so thoroughly for so many years?
vityas on November 21, 2012 at 11:10 AM
Reggie Love left in thime…
The media were/are in Obama’s azz. It’s not Beluga caviar that you eat, you swine.
Schadenfreude on November 21, 2012 at 11:13 AM
time
Schadenfreude on November 21, 2012 at 11:13 AM
Sexual Puritanism?
PLEASE.
What’s wrong with expecting our “leaders” to exhibit some sort of moral compass?
If they can’t be trusted to do the right thing for others in their personal lives, what should make us believe they should be trusted to do the right thing for others in their professional lives?
blatantblue on November 21, 2012 at 11:18 AM
From LincolntheHun’s comment on Milbank’s drivel:
It happened in Afghanistan, Emily, when he was still under UCMJ and he still is today because he receives a pension. The Clinton precedent is not workable when the “other woman” has all sorts of technology to pass along classified information through photos, recordings, videos, etc. Real moral courage would be for Obama to announce that Clinton’s behavior (getting away with it) set our country on a horrible course in terms of the morality of our politicians and our national security, but that is not what you had in mind for a Nixon-like “China moment.” Moral courage and Obama do not belong in the same sentence.
mwbri on November 21, 2012 at 11:20 AM
Petraeus might have tried to hold on if he was an elected official. This is different. And military, no less. No, he sees it clearly enough. He can’t command troops, or lead the CIA.
Paul-Cincy on November 21, 2012 at 11:25 AM
Honesty, loyalty, fidelity.
Like the Honey Badger, the sluts at Slate don’t care.
Besides Petraeus is a useless preening dick.
BL@KBIRD on November 21, 2012 at 12:03 PM
And the degradation of human society continues.
BKeyser on November 21, 2012 at 12:18 PM