This Republican shift is giving us new hope on immigration
There is a long way to go before an immigration deal is struck, but the president and Congress can draw its outlines clearly, starting now. Any worthwhile reform must give 11 million undocumented immigrants a way to live within the law as American citizens. Mr. Obama’s stopgap move to protect young immigrants and students from deportation by a regulation similar to the Dream Act was sensible and necessary. But these Americans-in-fact deserve the chance to be Americans on paper, too. So do their parents, and whoever else in the 11 million wishes to journey from “them” to “us.” Republicans are floating schemes for temporary legal status for workers without a clear path to citizenship. Mr. Obama should make clear that basic equality demands more than that.
Meanwhile, he should be reforming the way his administration is carrying out current law — starting with scaling back its arbitrary, self-imposed quota of 400,000 deportations a year. There is enforcement work to be done, like finding more effective ways to stifle illegal employment, but any strategy that fixates on deportations and the border is foolish and ineffective. Illegal border crossings and arrests at the border have fallen to the lowest levels in decades. The unauthorized immigrants whom hard-liners want to keep out are already in the country. They are the workers and families Mr. Obama says he wants to integrate and assimilate, even as his policies break those families apart. Mr. Obama’s own Department of Homeland Security is a huge part of the problem, with its dangerous and widening use of state and local police officers as surrogate immigration enforcement agents. Its Secure Communities program has led to mass deportations of minor offenders and even people with no criminal records.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
If Mexicans got U.S. citizenship & voted as a majority for Republicans, would NYT have so much hope on immigration?
8 weight on November 19, 2012 at 7:39 AM
Yeah, elect a president who’s determined to destroy the economy, then give what’s left of it to people who broke the law to get here. That’s a real recipe for success.
backwoods conservative on November 19, 2012 at 7:41 AM
Translation – Hooray, Tejas will soon be back in Mexican hands.
Steve Eggleston on November 19, 2012 at 7:49 AM
Condescending bullcrap. “Maybe the those idiots with guns and Bibles are finally starting to see how dumb and racist they are.”
Mimzey on November 19, 2012 at 8:01 AM
And you start by insisting that they enter the country via legal means.
Rewarding criminal activity seems to be the done thing, these days.
OldEnglish on November 19, 2012 at 8:02 AM
What!?
OldEnglish on November 19, 2012 at 8:03 AM
The first two paragraphs of the piece are worth visiting the site, just to see how much they despise you.
eforhan on November 19, 2012 at 8:05 AM
Com’on, how long can this last? It’s lip service to disgruntled big buck donators. “Look at us! We’re going to get Latino votes, give our super PAC another half a billion dollars to do it.”
Would you put this past Karl Rove and company?
RINOs are people too on November 19, 2012 at 8:07 AM
Republicans have always supported immigration…and the rule of law.
trs on November 19, 2012 at 8:11 AM
Unstinkingbelievable
cmsinaz on November 19, 2012 at 8:11 AM
Why stop there? Why not give the entire world American citizenship? I mean, when you think about it, a poor Ethiopian kid is simply an undocumented immigrant who hasn’t gotten here yet.
xblade on November 19, 2012 at 8:25 AM
Here’s the “deal”: Deport them! Every single one of them!
Valkyriepundit on November 19, 2012 at 8:35 AM
I’m pretty sure Ethiopians are the lost thirteenth tribe, so they’re really Isrealis who haven’t gotten there yet. Angolans on the other hand…
RINOs are people too on November 19, 2012 at 8:38 AM
Hey NYT rather than simply rewarding Mexicans for their illegality let’s just abolish the INS and invite everyone in.
Run Red
harlekwin15 on November 19, 2012 at 8:40 AM
To believe than providing citizenship will stem the tide of futher illegal immigration is as stupid minded as thinking that legalizing pot will stop the War on Drugs.
If you make these people citizens, they’ll be paid a US wage by law. Your food bill will go up until … wait for it. Yes, the next wave of illegal immigrants show up to work outside our employment laws.
We are so screwed.
hawkdriver on November 19, 2012 at 8:44 AM
La Raza – all according to plan, along with one party rule.
OldEnglish on November 19, 2012 at 8:50 AM
Technicalities. They’ve probably all heard about America, so that qualifies them for citizenship. Think about all the grandmothers around the world. You’re not heartless, are you?
xblade on November 19, 2012 at 8:52 AM
And will be legally entitled to the same welfare programs available to citizens….at a time when the unemployment rate among legal Hispanics is about 16%. What could possibly go wrong?
xblade on November 19, 2012 at 8:59 AM
There is no Republican shift. There are only some Republican lawmakers who remain fools.
There is wide public support for tighter immigration enforcement. In a May 2010 Pew poll taken just after the Arizona laws were passed, 73 percent approved of the law’s requirement that people produce documents verifying their legal status, 67 percent approved of allowing the police to detain people who cannot do so and 62 percent approved of allowing police to question anyone they suspect is in the country illegally.
So someone please explain to me ….do the majority of the American people favor new amnesty proposals? It sure doesn’t look like it to me.
lynncgb on November 19, 2012 at 9:01 AM
Why in the world would any country want to encourage people to come to their country who cannot provide for themselves, have zero to few skills, & intend to live off of the public dole?
Why, a country run by corrupt politicians of all stripes, that’s what kind of country.
Badger40 on November 19, 2012 at 9:10 AM
GIVE THEM ALL A LIBERTY TEST
Quiz them on the founding fathers and limited government. If they show an understanding of what it means to be an American, then Bienvenidos!
If they turn out to be socialist scum, send them back across the border, or give them a one-way ticket to Cuba or Venezuela.
ericdondero on November 19, 2012 at 9:23 AM
This is essentially a grant of reparations to Mexico for American perfidy since 1836. There wouldn’t be an illegal immigrant problem of bothersome dimensions if Mexico weren’t (a) dysfunctional , (b) on our border and (c)run by highly nationalistic elites resentful of their historical treatment by Yankee imperialists. If the amnesty crowd were honest it would remind white Americans that we owe what’s left of our power and prosperity to oppressed Mexicans just as we did to black slaves and Chinese coolies, and this is an opportunity to start making it right.
But don’t make a silly joke out if it by preaching about assimilationist Americanism when nobody in the pro-amnesty coalition of vote-hungry politicians, labor-craving employers, guilt-ridden celebrities and racist Mexican irredentists has the slightest intention of asking their charges to so much as hyphenate their identities. That’s supposed to happen out of thin air, with suitable apologies for the inadvertent imposition.
Seth Halpern on November 19, 2012 at 9:53 AM
How’s this for a Republican shift, I stop paying for…everything. I charge my groceries and don’t pay the bill. I go to the hospital for my medical and I ignore payment notices. I stop paying any bill that comes to me including my mortgage and property taxes.
What would happen if all of the honest hard-working legal citizens of this country just went on strike? I’m very serious about this too.
moonsbreath on November 19, 2012 at 10:06 AM
No, they don’t. That’s why pollsters, politicians, and pro-amnesty media refuse to use the word amnesty when pushing the issue.
xblade on November 19, 2012 at 10:24 AM