Makers vs. takers
In effect, the 21st century version of class conflict sets the stage for an exceptionally bitter face-off between the left and the right in Congress. The national government is facing the prospect of forced austerity, weighing such zero-sum choices as raising capital gains taxes or cutting food stamps, slashing defense spending or restricting unemployment benefits, establishing a 15 cents-a-gallon gasoline tax or pushing citizens off the Medicaid rolls, pushing central bank policy favorable to the financial services industry or curtailing Medicare eligibility.
In broader terms, the political confrontation pits taxpayers, who now form the core of the center-right coalition, against tax consumers who form the core of the center-left. According to the Tax Policy Center, 46.4 percent of all tax filers had no federal income tax liability in 2011 (although most people pay a combination of state, sales, excise, property and other levies).There are clear exceptions to this dichotomy, as many Social Security and Medicare beneficiaries (tax recipients) vote Republican, and many college-educated upper-income citizens of all races and ethnicities (tax payers) vote Democratic. Nonetheless, the overarching division remains, and the battle lines are drawn over how to distribute the costs of the looming fiscal crisis. The outcome of this policy fight will determine whether Limbaugh is correct to fear that his side has “lost the country.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
As Mark Steyn notes – reality doesn’t need a majority of the vote or popularity in polling to assert itself.
We’re quickly reaching the point at which we will no longer be able to loot the future to bribe the present.
gwelf on November 19, 2012 at 3:36 PM
If you own a business fire a bunch of millennials. They, the ones who’ve never produced anything, brung Obama, twice.
Let them feel the pain.
Schadenfreude on November 19, 2012 at 3:40 PM
Or as in the case of Hostess:
Bakers vs. Takers
honsy on November 19, 2012 at 3:41 PM
From the Housing thread – Archivarix said it to perfection:
Schadenfreude on November 19, 2012 at 3:43 PM
Just the very beginning
Schadenfreude on November 19, 2012 at 3:44 PM
That chart of numbers is a report card for the greedy teachers union, and the proggies give them an A+ for what they have accomplished.
slickwillie2001 on November 19, 2012 at 3:45 PM
Starve the looters (as in bad characters in Rand fiction, er reality).
They live like the Obamas and don’t give a crap about the middle class and the poor.
The moochers are kept in modern day plantations, uneducated, uncared for, just for voting fodder.
Schadenfreude on November 19, 2012 at 3:45 PM
As Rush said on his program today, we’re past the point where words and ideas matter. It’s now events that will determine the course of things.
CurtZHP on November 19, 2012 at 3:47 PM
If you own a business, fire anyone in your employ who you know voted for Obama. Whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, be an equal opportunity fire-er. If you ever saw them with an Obama t-shirt, if you ever heard them make pro-Obama comments in the break room, if they ever asked for time off to attend some Democrat function, can their arses now!
ericdondero on November 19, 2012 at 3:51 PM
We keep saying the current system is unsustainable. But what if it isn’t? Liberals seem to be convinced it isn’t.
The good thing about watching this is that it it isn’t sustainable, it’s going to be the city dwellers with no skills and no guns who will suffer most. Out here in Jesusland we’ll probably be just fine. We have land, and skills, and guns.
rockmom on November 19, 2012 at 3:51 PM
FIFY
ProfShadow on November 19, 2012 at 3:56 PM
Time to stock up and get ready. A few extra items seems only prudent, eh?
beatcanvas on November 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM
It is unsustainable. Ask Greece. The only way they’re being propped up right now is by massive infusions of money from outside their economy. America is too big to use that solution.
The bottom line is, as fewer and fewer people work, the less real money their is in your economy. So you end up using the profits from future labors to pay for present idleness. Even the ant and the grasshopper know how that will work out.
hawksruleva on November 19, 2012 at 4:07 PM
I don’t employ anyone (locally) so I can’t make any dramatic statements by laying off people. But as a full-time employee, plus running my own business on the side, I certainly am making considerable efforts now to reduce my tax contribution.
Prior to the election I didn’t worry that much about tax reduction. I earned enough that the taxes didn’t adversely affect me or my family and I still had a sense of civic duty.
Now though, I’m taking a leaf out of Warren Buffet’s playbook. He’s on record saying, on 60 Minutes not that long ago, that he’s spent his entire life learning how to minimise his tax burden (and yet he’s held up by the left as a tax paying role model – go figure). So thanks to the leechers that voted for more Obama, I’m now going to do the same. I’m going to spend more time in the coming years learning about tax reduction than I will about growing my business.
The sad part about that is that I’ll probably be better off – and those are words you’ll never hear a lefty say.
Nordic on November 19, 2012 at 4:13 PM
And, then, you have the opportunity to explain to them that they certainly do have a right to free speech, just as you have a right of freedom of association, and you can fire them since it’s your business. Oh, and the definition of censorship, too (which it ain’t).
GWB on November 19, 2012 at 4:35 PM
The Red States shall inherit the earth.
Punchenko on November 19, 2012 at 4:43 PM
Something from that chart in the article really struck me. It was the huge jump in favorable views of socialism when you went from the 30-49 age group to the 18-29 age group, where the 18-29 group actually had an overall favorable view of socialism vs the 30-49s who had an unfavorable view by 16 points. It dawned on me that these young people in the 18-29 bracket don’t remember the Soviet Union or the Eastern Bloc nations. They didn’t see first hand the complete and total collapse of the socialist/communist model through the 80s and into the early 90s (or were too young to understand it). They didn’t see the pictures and videos of people standing in huge lines to get their government bread and government toilet paper… or even hear Russian citizens saying, “I don’t know what this line is for, but I saw a line and got in it because it’s probably something I need.”
I guess it speaks to the old saying, “Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.”
gravityman on November 19, 2012 at 5:05 PM
True. America’s solution is quite different. Greece can’t print it’s on money, since it’s on the euro. It can’t print gobs of drachmas anymore so that it can pay off it’s debt with money that isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on. America is quite different. We will never risk defaulting on our debt because we can print money. Instead, we’ll have a whole different problem. We’ll print all the money we need to pay off our debt, but the value of those dollars will be nothing. Of course, that gives us a whole different problem… that of having a worthless currency which drives up the price of goods, and then we can all look like Wiemar Republic German citizens carrying our wheelbarrow full of money to the store to buy a single loaf of bread.
gravityman on November 19, 2012 at 5:09 PM