Can conservatives prevent the U.S. from becoming California?
Don’t think for a second that California’s chronic deficits are caused by low taxes. Even before last Tuesday’s tax hikes, California had the most progressive income tax system in the nation, with seven brackets, and the second-highest top marginal rate. Now it has the nation’s highest top marginal rate and the nation’s highest sales tax. And the budget still isn’t balanced.
The real cause for California’s fiscal crisis is simple: They spend too much money. Between 1996 and 2012, the state’s population grew by just 15 percent, but spending more than doubled, from $45.4 billion to $92.5 billion (in 2005 constant dollars).
What are Californians getting for all this government spending? According to a new census report released Friday, almost one-quarter, 23.5 percent, of all Californians are in poverty. One-third of all the nation’s welfare recipients live in the state, despite the fact that California has only one-eighth of the country’s population. That’s four times as many as the next-highest welfare population, which is New York. Meanwhile, California eighth-graders finished ahead of only Mississippi and District of Columbia students on reading and math test scores in 2011.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I think we missed our shot at it about 2 weeks ago…
BigWyo on November 19, 2012 at 6:53 PM
No,they can’t. Mostly because the leadership of the Republicans are not Conservative. At least not in the same way Democrats are Liberal.
Rocks on November 19, 2012 at 6:55 PM
I have to agree with Rush.
Events, dear boy, events
Sekhmet on November 19, 2012 at 6:57 PM
Step 1: Secede from the Union. Going to mess up the flag and all, but trying times and all….
ProfShadow on November 19, 2012 at 7:00 PM
No.
I disagree with Rush on this. It is absolutely inevitable that whether or not Republicans win the presidency in 2016, we will be California very soon. Entitlements + Interest, people…
Timin203 on November 19, 2012 at 7:05 PM
According to a new census report released Friday, almost one-quarter, 23.5 percent, of all Californians are in poverty. One-third of all the nation’s welfare recipients live in the state, despite the fact that California has only one-eighth of the country’s population. That’s four times as many as the next-highest welfare population, which is New York.
That is insane.
Paul-Cincy on November 19, 2012 at 7:07 PM
I’ve been telling non-Californians for years that California’s zombie plague of bankruptcy, tyrannical government, and raging anti-white-middle-class progressivism is headed their way. Sadly, in the last election, the drooling moron segment of the population in places like Ohio, Wisconsin and Iowa voted for it.
By the time the brutal reality of what they asked for hits them it will be too late.
Django on November 19, 2012 at 7:09 PM
Wait…so they’re NOT here doing the jobs Americans won’t do?! You don’t say…
Rational Thought on November 19, 2012 at 7:10 PM
It’s not really far away. It’s here. You think California’s finances are bad? Look at the federal governments. No comparison. You think your government is tyrannical in your state? ahem. And anti white middle class progressiveness has been everywhere for most of my lifetime.
They won.
Timin203 on November 19, 2012 at 7:12 PM
Move to the South. We’re doing just fine.
Punchenko on November 19, 2012 at 7:16 PM
I live in GA. The cities and rural towns are filled to the brim with welfare morons reproducing at an alarming rate. There is no escape.
ktrich on November 19, 2012 at 7:24 PM
Agreed.
The whole conservative attitude of “We’re decent and wholesome and therefore we will win” has been a laughable, wimpy failure. Rove and Bush offered no counter to criticisms for eight years because they were “above the fray.” After Romney got rejected, we’ve had some conservative commenters saying “Hey, I think we lost the culture war.” Well no s–t.
It goes back much farther than the Bush years, of course. And even today, the GOP and conservatives in general can’t bring themselves to be honest about what’s happened in our society. And no amount of “Death to the White Man!” articles from various mainstream sites and newspapers is able to wake them up. The right’s only thought is to dump their traditional base and acquire the Democrats’ base.
Breitbart was about the only guy on the right who got it and he’s dead.
Django on November 19, 2012 at 7:25 PM
From the article:
The only “upside” of living in The People’s Republic of Illinois is that we’re already close to rock-bottom. It would be very painful to live in a place like Texas and see it ruined by ignorant Leftists fleeing their failed Utopia, and then voting for Leftists.
visions on November 19, 2012 at 7:25 PM
Just head South and don’t look back.
Punchenko on November 19, 2012 at 7:37 PM
I can’t take the heat. I think I’ll have to head to somewhere in the Rocky Mountains eventually.
Django on November 19, 2012 at 7:38 PM
No. Mitt was our last chance. You ABRs who stayed home messed up.
Basilsbest on November 19, 2012 at 7:40 PM
Breitbart would have been 100% behind the nominee.
Basilsbest on November 19, 2012 at 7:43 PM
Let’s just say as a Californian I was stunned that the voters went for the tax increases AND elected a super majority of dems who now have no one to offer even token resistance.
Over the last year it came to light that agencies were hiding money and High Speed railroad to nowhere has become unfavorable yet they still went for Brown and his union cronies BS.
arnold ziffel on November 19, 2012 at 8:30 PM
Don’t miss this article on how the definition of ‘poverty’ has become so flexible that it can never be eliminated: …The new “supplemental” poverty line is a complicated measure produced by formulas that are barely understood by poverty experts. It takes into account in-kind government benefits, which is fine, and regional costs-of-living. But at its core it is a deception: it measures not absolute poverty but relative poverty–i.e. inequality…
slickwillie2001 on November 19, 2012 at 8:32 PM