The “hybrid view” of Benghazi
The “hybrid” explanation is a compromise, of sorts, between two competing narratives. The first suggested that a protest against an anti-Islam film in Benghazi led to a “spontaneous” assault on the US consulate there. We know that version isn’t true because there never was any protest in Benghazi. The second narrative points to a terrorist attack. The weaponry involved in the assault, the sophistication of the operation and, most importantly, the involvement of al Qaeda-linked terrorists all buttress this second version.
While there was no film protest in Benghazi, however, there are reasons to suspect that the events in Egypt and Libya on Sept. 11 are linked. But that link isn’t an anti-Islam film. They are linked by the fact that known al Qaeda-affiliated individuals were directly involved in both.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Who gave the order to Stand Down?????
all of this focus on the after phase is ignoring that 4 Americans were killed in the “during” phase?
ted c on November 18, 2012 at 10:58 AM
Leave it to the Weekly Standard: whether it be tax policy, spending policy, social policy or foreign policy, the left says it’s a floor wax, the right says it’s a dessert topping and Kristol’s clique weighs in at the end with the very helpful “hey, guys, no need to argue, it’s a floor wax AND a dessert topping”. Problem solved.
fitzfong on November 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM
And we’ve always been at war with Eastasia.
BigGator5 on November 18, 2012 at 11:44 AM