Blame Hamas
Hamas is smart enough to understand that Israeli leaders can’t cut them any more slack. Sure, even Prime Minister Netanyahu (let’s call him Bibi) understands that Hamas is more cautious than in the past, since, as a government collecting taxes and building assets, it now has a lot to lose. But Israel has little choice but to put the worst interpretation on Hamas’s actions, for an obvious reason: Hamas pledges to destroy the state of Israel. Hamas-lovers lose all credibility when they ignore that fact.
The Palestinian blame does not end with Hamas in Gaza, but runs to the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank. For sure, Bibi’s government has made peace prospects ever dimmer. But that, too, is not without cause. Bibi came to power in the wake of two failed Israeli peace efforts—efforts that Palestinian leaders rejected. These offers were made by Ehud Barak at the end of the Clinton administration, and by Ehud Olmert at the end of George W. Bush’s term. Olmert offered the Palestinians almost all of what they had been demanding—a state with safe passage between the West Bank and Gaza, a capital in East Jerusalem, a readjustment of Israeli settlements and 1967 borders, etc. When the plans were rejected, first by Yasir Arafat and then by current Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, Israeli politics turned sharply rightward on peace efforts.
During this time, President Abbas has done little or nothing to prepare the Palestinian people for a peace settlement with a Jewish state of Israel. His people say he’s not politically strong enough to try, but that’s true for all leaders faced with difficult compromises with adversaries and enemies. Some step up to the plate with courage, and others, like Abbas, run away. How much courage would it take for him to ask that the Olmert proposal be put back on the table? He’s never come close to doing this, and the cost of doing so would not be great. In fact, he would benefit by putting the onus of political pressure back on Bibi. So when the blame is apportioned, Abbas and his fellow West Bank leaders have a good deal to answer for.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
And you can blame hamas for this, NOT Israel!
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/it-seems-the-dead-boy-used-as-symbol-of-israeli-aggression-was-killed-by-hamas-warning-graphic-photo/
L
letget on November 18, 2012 at 6:54 PM
Barak was nuts.
Blake on November 18, 2012 at 6:59 PM
I’m very grateful that Arafat rejected the Olmert proposal – the results would have been devastating for Israel!
OldEnglish on November 18, 2012 at 7:00 PM
Yeah, I read that about 100 Hamas rockets landed in Gaza.
Blake on November 18, 2012 at 7:01 PM
Whoops! I meant Olmert.
Blake on November 18, 2012 at 7:05 PM
Barak and Olmert were nuts.They would never have been able to sell those deals to the Knesset. Arafat and Abbas saved them the trouble. It shows you just what nut jobs Arafat and Abbas were in not taking the deal and forcing the Knesset to look like the bad guy when the deal went south. Arafat and Abbas didn’t take the deal because they know only one solution will be accepted by Hamas and the rest of the loonies, the end of Israel.
Rocks on November 18, 2012 at 7:15 PM
Hey, what happened to the big Arafat was poisoned by Mossad conspiracy a few months ago? I thought they were going to exhume the body or something.
Blake on November 18, 2012 at 7:17 PM
They did exhume it.
Rocks on November 18, 2012 at 7:22 PM
To say that Hamas has the same intentions of Adolf Hitler is not an exaggeration. The group, along with many other Islamofascist organisations, even has the same salute:
Photograph
Resist We Much on November 18, 2012 at 7:25 PM
Gilad Sharon–Ariel’s son:
davidk on November 18, 2012 at 7:39 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=M948bJPW_gA
Nazis..Islamists. Not much difference.
Mimzey on November 18, 2012 at 7:55 PM
Just read the Hamas Charter. Adolf Hitler would be proud.
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp
You can’t deal with people like this.
SC.Charlie on November 18, 2012 at 9:01 PM
Of course. Muzzies in the ME and North Africa were allied with Hitler during the war. They liked his ‘solutions’.
slickwillie2001 on November 18, 2012 at 9:27 PM
I think talks of a peace deal are quite immature. Previous deals would have removed the conflict as a weapon for the tyrants in the region. They fell through for the same reason Obama did not try for immigration reform in his first term—he needed the issue as a wedge for 2012 just as the tyrants in the region needed Israel as a scapegoat whenever their people were upset about their own conditions.
Now that all the dynamics in the region have changed, it will take a little time for the new power structure to settle out and the Arab Spring countries seem perfectly willing to maintain the status quo re Israel/Palestine a bit longer.
I think it would be in Egypt’s interest to broker a settlement, especially since this conflict seems to be a test of their new leadership but doing so might possibly cause the Brotherhood more blowback than they can handle so I don’t know that they’re pushing all that hard.
But sure, go ahead and try for peace talks. Though we know already how they’ll end. Insanity is blah blah blah.
MaggiePoo on November 19, 2012 at 12:21 PM