How cheap energy from shale will reshape America’s role in the world
Shashank Joshi, a fellow of the Royal United Services Institute, said: “The Gulf Arab political order for almost the entire post-war period has depended on US interest in the region.
“The monarchies endured for so long not because of any sort of popular legitimacy but because they could depend on enormous external support. Those regimes, which have already had to deal with a high degree of domestic mobilisation will come under unbearable stress and they cannot survive without the technical advantage of western weapons.”
Few are expecting the US Fifth Fleet to pack up and sail home in the immediate future, just because America has found enough oil and gas for its needs in its own back garden. Geopolitical change tends to lag a decade or two behind economic change, but as the US finds itself less reliant on regimes with which it has little in common there will be powerful pressure on the Pentagon to begin to bring home its troops and hardware.
The speed of US disengagement will depend to a large extent on whether the alternative is a vacuum and instability, as a variety of religious and tribal forces vie to inherit the Gulf kingdoms. The role of Iran, an economy largely dependent on oil sales that already faces severe budget shortfalls from sanctions, is likely to be critical. Whether it responds to crisis by collaboration or confrontation with its traditional Gulf adversaries will shape the region’s future.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Obama will find a way to kill production. He hates America.
darwin on November 16, 2012 at 9:44 AM
This guy must be unaware of the EPA, Interior Department, and countless environmentalist groups constantly blocking just about everything.
If we could overcome the Left then we could achieve not only energy independence but become an energy exporter.
Charlemagne on November 16, 2012 at 9:46 AM
Unless Obama destroys it.
Here in PA we are fracking like crazy. We have a Republican legislature and Governor, but we just elected a Democrat Attorney General who has pledged to go after the gas industry.
JellyToast on November 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM
What’s the rationale for going after the gas industry?
darwin on November 16, 2012 at 9:55 AM
Prediction: Dear Leader ends fracking by fiat. GOP House unavailable for comment (let alone action) …
ShainS on November 16, 2012 at 9:55 AM
They’ll attack frakking.
It is inevitable.
Badger40 on November 16, 2012 at 9:57 AM
That would have happened if Romney were prez. Obama will deliberately set us back on energy as many generations as he can.
petefrt on November 16, 2012 at 9:58 AM
Fixed it for the post-election world. President Choom has already made it clear that his “Balanced Approach” does not include gas or oil.
RoadRunner on November 16, 2012 at 10:01 AM
Since when have libs required a rationale? You’ll have to ask President Choom or the Sierra Club to get their convoluted, politically-correct answers.
RoadRunner on November 16, 2012 at 10:02 AM
Obama is never going to allow this, it doesn’t fit his plan for the New Improved America 2.0.
Cheap, abundant energy would result in a renewed American prosperity and that is not in the plan.
clippermiami on November 16, 2012 at 10:04 AM
I’m hoping that everyone who has even toyed with the idea of fraking break ground ASAP, before the EPA tries to come down on them.
petefrt on November 16, 2012 at 10:08 AM
Uh, the Dems are saying around here that Fracking is destroying ground water, could cause earth quakes and the industry is reaping huge profits.
The reason reason is it makes America strong and the people will benefit by depending on the government less.
It is a common news around here.. talk to just about anyone in my town and someone knows somebody… some family farm out in the country that was poor or some single parent living in an old house out in the woods that now has $10,000. a month income from gas platforms on their land. Average people are getting rich. Not good for government.
JellyToast on November 16, 2012 at 10:16 AM
Wow. I can just imagine the environmentalists and the other liberals going at it hammer and tongs with eachother over whether to restrain production in the name of Green Energy or allow it as a source of tax revenue to help maintain entitlements. Can you say wedge issue?
Seth Halpern on November 16, 2012 at 10:18 AM
My money is on the Demotards killing it to appease their “green” base. Tax revenues (or in fact any fiscal concerns) are way down on their list.
UltimateBob on November 16, 2012 at 10:35 AM
I predict that if there is that much potential $$$ awaiting, Obama will let it happen and tax the living tish out of it. What we won’t see is a reduction in our own energy costs. My guess is that gasoline prices stay pretty much where they are now, the offset being eaten up with new enviro taxes.
roy_batty on November 16, 2012 at 10:57 AM
The Hill, 11/09/12 02:07 PM ET
“Interior proposal would limit commercial oil shale development on federal lands”
entagor on November 16, 2012 at 11:56 AM