“We’ve got to give our political organization a very serious proctology exam”
“We need to have a brutally honest assessment of what we did,” said Haley Barbour, the former Mississippi governor and Republican uber-strategist. His party’s entire political operation, Barbour said, needs “a very serious proctology exam.”…
“Our candidate got defined early without an effective response,” said Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker…
“What [the American people] heard is, we are a party that cares more about people that have already lived the American Dream and made it, as opposed to the rest of the country that is still trying to climb that ladder,” said Bob McDonnell, the governor of Virginia and outgoing RGA chairman. “That’s not our position. We honestly did not do a good job saying why those principles of limited government and lower taxes and individual responsibility and energy independence, et cetera, why is that better for every American family.”…
“The honest truth is, look, Governor Romney’s campaign I don’t think laid out a specific vision that connected with American voters. Governor Romney is an honorable person, and he should be thanked for his many years of public service, but his campaign was largely about his biography and his experience,” said Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal. “But time and time again, biography and experience are not enough to win an election. You have to have a vision; you have to connect your policies to the aspirations of the American people. I don’t think the campaign did that. As a result, I think this campaign became a contest about personalities.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Oh my… what’s Obama doing in here?
The Rogue Tomato on November 15, 2012 at 1:30 PM
You’ll find the ballots of those who chose to stay home up there, because that is where they told the GOP to stick it.
portlandon on November 15, 2012 at 1:36 PM
You have to have a vision; you have to connect your policies to the aspirations of the American people. I don’t think the campaign did that. As a result, I think this campaign became a contest about personalities.”
Yeah, that’s it. See, Obama has a VISION!!!!
Actually, no, he does not….BUT he IS a Personality.
Soooooo, there are two sets of rules you see.
Republicans have to Lay out a VISION. Dems just need a Personality,
Here ends the reading.
ToddPA on November 15, 2012 at 1:38 PM
Not…Gonna…Go….There….
D-fusit on November 15, 2012 at 1:38 PM
Cult of Personality
D-fusit on November 15, 2012 at 1:41 PM
You know, I like Jindal, but he needs to cool it on the criticism of Romney. Well, I guess to be specific he needs to be more measured. There are some strategic lessons that must be learned, but I think we should aim most of our criticism at the people ripping the country down, not ourselves.
WolvenOne on November 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM
So, in one short week we’ve gone from navel-gazing to anu$ gazing?
Nice.
UltimateBob on November 15, 2012 at 1:47 PM
says an a hole…
kunegetikos on November 15, 2012 at 1:49 PM
Here in Montana Romney won with almost 55% of the vote, while Denny Rehberg lost the Senate race, taking only a little less than 45% of the vote. There were very few ads concerning the Presidential race, while there was a blizzard of negative ads pounding Rehberg. In addition the libs took out ads boosting the Libertarian candidate, who got almost twice the votes as the Libertarian running in the Presidential race. The Democrats had a much stronger ground game as well. They had people doing door to door surveys, then followed up by distributing yard signs for ALL their candidates. The Republicans by contrast failed to communicate with their base, or do much to help. The result? Democrats dominated the State races.
claudius on November 15, 2012 at 1:49 PM
Yeah, I heard. No permanent damage most likely, but this clearly shows that we’ve been taking state races in red states far too for-granted. We need to take a more holistic approach to winning elections, rather than just focusing in one or two places at a time.
WolvenOne on November 15, 2012 at 1:53 PM
What vision did Obama have? He relied on bumper sticker slogans and his skin color in ’08, and this time he relied on…well, bumper sticker slogans and his skin color, as well as a very negative campaign.
I think it comes down to personality with the public, regardless of what the candidates do.
changer1701 on November 15, 2012 at 1:53 PM
Step one is to do nothing. Seriously. I don’t care if it’s Palin, Perry, Santorum, Bush, Zombie Reagan, or whoever. Don’t talk to them, don’t start any balls rolling for 2016, don’t do anything.
For all the talk of the 0bama team’s supposed brilliance in micro-targeting low-info non-voters, nobody seems to remember that Team Romney practically fired up their 2012 campaign as they were sweeping away the confetti from the 2008 convention. 0bama could see two people coming, and had strategies to spend the next four years salting the earth against them: Palin and Romney. Palin had the sense not to walk into the trap. Whoever we run in ’16 should only become clear about 18 months before the 2016 election. Don’t give the incumbent Democrats five years to prepare.
Secondly, we need to break the machine. A disorganized community can’t be herded to the polls, and without freebies, it shall be harder to lure them. Pop the higher education bubble, by whatever means we can. 18-24′s are already driven to the polls by their overpaid professors. We can’t make ‘em any more likely to vote against us, and there’s a chance skipping out on Liberal U’s Wymyn’s Studies classes in favor of math classes at the local junior college may make them less likely to show up against us. Let the liberals crash the tax base, and then let’s pop some popcorn while we watch which of their incompatible consituencies they screw in favor of another. Be sure to remind the screwed at every opportunity how the other guy was more loved by “Santa” than they were.
Sekhmet on November 15, 2012 at 2:05 PM
No. The majority of American voters who did vote decided they really do want a fascist mommy government in Washington DC. The minority that didn’t vote but might have thrown the election away from Obama decided they would rather live in fear and servitude than freedom. Vision wasn’t the issue – nor candidate. The issue is that a vast part of America really does want to live the fascist dream.
GWB on November 15, 2012 at 3:06 PM
Oh, and because the Republicans failed to stop or kill Obamacare, I doubt the party will be able to afford that proctology exam.
GWB on November 15, 2012 at 3:09 PM
well, i’m sure that halley is a good ole’ boy from way back. but the questions are simple:
command and control economy..yes or no?
serf or freeman?
bravery or money?
corruption or truth?
somehow most Rs and Haley himself would try to hedge these questions. and that’s all the examination you need haley
r keller on November 15, 2012 at 3:12 PM
If you’re willing to start doing to the Democratic Communist Party’s asses what they’ve been doing to ours for decades, I’ll lend a hand. And so will a whole bunch of other people with real jobs.
But if you claim to have a magic formula for magically making our lifetime political hacks better than their lifetime political hacks, hey, good luck with that.
logis on November 15, 2012 at 3:37 PM