How to end blackouts forever
Such resilient grid design would protect us all from cascading and potentially economy-shattering blackouts that could make Sandy look trivial. Earthquakes, superstorms, floods, and wildfires are the least of our worries. Solar storms make massive grid failures inevitable — the only question is when, and it’s about time for another big one. A simple acts of terrorism could black out a city for months. A concerted cyberattack launched anonymously from anywhere on earth could physically destroy key grid assets across much or all of the country, returning America instantly to the seventh century, with dim prospects for recovery.
The solution is in our hands, and it’s proven. When wildfire cut a major power line, the University of California at San Diego’s microgrid switched from importing to exporting power from its onsite sources in less than a half-hour. Denmark is reorganizing its grid in “cellular” fashion, stress-testing annually by cutting off the grid to make sure each “cell” still meets vital loads. Prof. Rikiya Abe at Tokyo University has even invented a “digital grid” whose “routers” can exchange power between microgrids without needing to run in lockstep like today’s analog grid.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
“Stop using electricity!”
-leftist enviroterrorists.
Bishop on November 15, 2012 at 6:52 PM
Ban Southern Comfort.
Armin Tamzarian on November 15, 2012 at 6:53 PM
No, that $$$ can be put toward Obama Phones and contraceptives. We got to buy votes, you know!
Fourword!
Punchenko on November 15, 2012 at 6:58 PM
maybe 1900 clown
newrouter on November 15, 2012 at 6:59 PM
I wonder how electric cars are doing in the black out areas?
portlandon on November 15, 2012 at 7:00 PM
I’d love to see those numbers…
cs89 on November 15, 2012 at 7:01 PM
Now THAT won’t help when I wake up with my head inside the dishwasher!
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on November 15, 2012 at 7:01 PM
Go nuclear – it’s the only way to be sure.
OldEnglish on November 15, 2012 at 7:06 PM
Bishop!
Here in New Hampshire, our new Democrat Governor Maggie Hassan favors a proposal to bury all the electric lines underground. Prohibitively expensive, of course, and she has no idea on how to pay for such a folly.
Meanwhile, the leftists here have had absolutely no problem with a new wind farm with 24 400 foot tall towers, located directly across the valley from the White Mountain National Forest and one of the only Peregrine Falcon nesting sites in the state.
Del Dolemonte on November 15, 2012 at 7:06 PM
Worse than that.
What they really mean is “no electricity for you” while they live a life of luxury in their ivory, electrically powered towers.
yubley on November 15, 2012 at 7:14 PM
Most of those infrastructure investments are pretty costly but in some areas investment like that pays for itself over time. What is the current grid’s outage frequency and management like there?
lexhamfox on November 15, 2012 at 7:15 PM
It’s about technology dependency. If electricity is taken away from us, we’re stuck.
Electronic payments stop working and there’s not enough cash to substitute, unlike 1900. No more cars, planes, trains, etc. and we don’t have horse wagons (or other 1900 means of transport) anymore so transportation is dead. If transportation is dead, how do we get food around? More importantly, water filtration and pumping systems would die too.
We would actually have to re-learn how to live like we lived in the past and that means we’d be less capable than we were in 1900.
When Sandy cripples the grid in parts of NY, we bring in resources from the rest of the state or country. What if disaster hits nationally and specifically targets the grid? It’s going to be bad.
With that being said, contrary to Hollywood movies, these systems work independently and are not even accessible from public networks. No one can take the whole country down.
lester on November 15, 2012 at 7:16 PM
That’s a stupid thing to spend money on. There are college students going broke buying birth control pills we need to help.
Transpo on November 15, 2012 at 7:21 PM
In my neck of Arizona, we have quite a lot (if not all) of our lines underground. Phone, power and cable. It makes for more aesthetically pleasing neighborhoods. We don’t have to worry about frost zones – or frost heave, so that might be another reason why it’s popular here.
Hill60 on November 15, 2012 at 7:21 PM
Lots of neat catch phrases…kinda short on meaning.
sharrukin on November 15, 2012 at 7:24 PM
Until we can build a power grid that can withstand an EMP attack or a Carrington event-level solar storm I’m not interested.
Cornell Conservative on November 15, 2012 at 7:30 PM
Ah yes, another MSM article about how severe weather is a serious issue when it hits the NE. That’s where the MSM is concentrated, so you’d better believe it is serious.
Tuscaloosa getting turned into kindling?
Nashville doing a good impression of Atlantis?
Joplin reduced to rubble?
Nothing to see there, happens all the time. And anyway, apparently there’s a lot of Christian whiteys there and their chickens just came home to roost.
CorporatePiggy on November 15, 2012 at 7:37 PM
I guess they’re thinking that show Revolution is a utopia, huh? No electricity, no United States…
malclave on November 15, 2012 at 7:47 PM
I think it means one of those NIMBY power plants on every street corner. If so, I can see why their dancing around just saying that.
Dusty on November 15, 2012 at 7:49 PM
Frack, baby, frack.
petefrt on November 15, 2012 at 7:52 PM
That and build lots of solar panels, sprinkle some fairy dust, and magically you don’t need all those mean old thermal coal plants, or nuclear reactors.
sharrukin on November 15, 2012 at 7:54 PM
Actually, I lean toward the micro grid approach. I read that mico nuclear generators are on the near horizon too.
petefrt on November 15, 2012 at 7:57 PM
You mean the small thorium reactors currently being tested?
sharrukin on November 15, 2012 at 8:00 PM
You have absolutely no idea how bad things would be if the power went off and stayed off. It would a decade at minimum to reign in the ensuing chaos, let alone start rebuilding pre-electric tech on any scale
MelonCollie on November 15, 2012 at 8:12 PM
if the power goes off my car still works. getting gas might be a problem but the mechanical systems still works.
newrouter on November 15, 2012 at 8:14 PM
sure i can. i can travel to some parts of long island tomorrow. technologically loss of power wouldn’t be a big deal but since 1990′s we as a nation have become a country of hapless losers
newrouter on November 15, 2012 at 8:19 PM
Safe, neighborhood nuclear reactors.
What?
Count to 10 on November 15, 2012 at 8:44 PM
I don’t think the ones I have read about are Thorium.
Count to 10 on November 15, 2012 at 8:46 PM
I’m not sure about the thorium part. I’d have to look it up again. But I did some reading on micro nuclear generators last last year, and the concept seems sound and the technology well within reach.
They can prefab these things and ship them, they take very little space, they’re economical, they’re safe, and they promise to be financially feasible. Every community should have one.
But what I really want is a fuel cell for my home. The Japanese are testing some residential units, but they’re still so expensive that they’re not practical. Bummer.
petefrt on November 15, 2012 at 8:49 PM
I want a nuke.
http://phys.org/news145561984.html
sharrukin on November 15, 2012 at 8:55 PM
Yes, by golly, I think that’s it!
I want a nuke too.
petefrt on November 15, 2012 at 9:06 PM
There’s a guy not too far from my house that put-up a wind turbine. On the front of the tower, is a sign that he updates monthly with a summary of his costs, recouped power savings, etc., and a net.
It has consistently been in the red since he put it up over a year ago.
Sustainable energy types are morons.
Mr Galt on November 15, 2012 at 9:12 PM
Well lets back into them… I think that’s doable.
http://gomarcellusshale.com/forum/topics/new-plant-electricity-cost-natural-gas-versus-coal-nuclear-wind
There’s a chart of electricity prices by source; and Natural gas rpices are lower than when this chart was made… Wind is about double; and solar is about 5 times the cost of Natural Gas produced electricity.
So the price of electricity will double when switching to 80% renewables (at best, possibly worse); and your cost overall will be about the same…
Therefore the price of the microgrid must be -1 * your lifetime electric bill. That’s the only way for this math to work.
Damn, at that price I’ll take two more. We don’t even have to use them, deliver them straight to my address (don’t worry that it’s marked as a landfill).
Who knew microgrids were so cheap that they were paying people to haul them away?
That is one strange business model they must have.
gekkobear on November 15, 2012 at 9:15 PM
Smart, the sign also keeps anyone from stealing it.
slickwillie2001 on November 15, 2012 at 9:26 PM
But the reeal solution is in nanogrids which work in sympathy with the Quark-o-grids. Thats where the real saving come in.
Mimzey on November 15, 2012 at 9:27 PM