How I was drawn into the cult of David Petraeus
The uncomfortable truth is that a lot of us who’ve covered Petraeus over the years could have written that. It’s embarrassingly close to my piece on Petraeus’ legacy that @bitteranagram tweeted. And that’s not something you should fault Petraeus for. It’s something you should fault reporters like me for. Another irony that Petraeus’ downfall reveals is that some of us who egotistically thought our coverage of Petraeus and counterinsurgency was so sophisticated were perpetuating myths without fully realizing it.
None of this is to say that Petraeus was actually a crappy officer whom the press turned into a genius. That would be just as dumb and ultimately unfair as lionizing Petraeus, whose affair had nothing to do with his military leadership or achievements. ”David Petraeus will be remembered as the finest officer of his generation, and as the commander who turned the Iraq War around,” emails military scholar Mark Moyar. But it is to say that a lot of the journalism around Petraeus gave him a pass, and I wrote too much of it. Writing critically about a public figure you come to admire is a journalistic challenge.
Conversations with people close to Petraeus since his resignation from the CIA have been practically funereal. People have expressed shock, and gotten occasionally emotional. It turns out, Mansoor sighed, “David Petraeus is human after all.” I wonder where anyone could have gotten the idea he wasn’t.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
How about the Obama cult?
Rod on November 11, 2012 at 5:38 PM
No he wasn’t crappy, but he wasn’t Patton either.
sharrukin on November 11, 2012 at 5:41 PM
Nearly everyone has aspects of their personality that are well hidden. People can do great things, but still have less than admirable qualities. Men who cheat, and cheat in such a reckless, sleazy fashion, are weak. Weak, weak, weak.
BettyRuth on November 11, 2012 at 5:42 PM
What a pu$$y. Is it possible that no liberal male has testicles?
Petraeus was an expert in counterinsurgency. One of the traits all people in that discipline have is the ability to mislead the enemy and misdirect enemy forces and attention.
So he fooled people into not seeing an affair. How is it any reflection on those who were fooled? I guess lib males think it’s always all about them. Drama queens, all of them.
platypus on November 11, 2012 at 5:46 PM
Spencer Ackerman is a little lefty turd whose shtick on journolist was to routinely threaten conservative (behind the safety of a closed list).
Blake on November 11, 2012 at 5:52 PM
Yeah, when I think about journalists being drawn into a cult of personality, Petraeus actually isnt the first name that comes to mind.
Valkyriepundit on November 11, 2012 at 5:54 PM
Since when did the term “human” come to refer to Petraeus’s affair more closely than to his military service? Why has such a morally pessimistic characterization of human nature found general acceptance in this way?
Ladies, gentlemen, political junkies: I submit to you that this sort of nihilistic view of humanity is at the heart of the political Left. It is a view that accepts that you are fundamentally incapable of even saving money for retirement, and thus someone superior to you has to physically take your money throughout your carrier, and can be trusted to give it back after you retire.
It is the view that you are a fundamentally flawed insufficient being, and are capable of nothing other than crying out out for fulfillment of your most basic needs, to be delivered by your betters at the cost of their betters.
It is this view that represents everything that is wrong with today’s politics. And it must be defeated before morning will come to America again.
Atlas on November 11, 2012 at 5:55 PM
He’s a traitor. He covered up the deaths of two Seals by blaming an idiotic video. He helped with circumventing the first amendment by allowing that man to be arrested and detained because of the video.
It’s disgusting that a man in the military would allow and assist in this.
I look forward to seeing him in ruins.
kim roy on November 11, 2012 at 5:58 PM
“All warfare is based on deception.”
–Sun Tzu
So an expert at a system of warfare that is, in itself, built on obfuscation, deceptive?
Amazing. /sarc
Also, it’s not a “cult” to say that Gen. Petraeus is a uniquely successful officer within the context of 21st century warfare. I can say that and still say that he was wrong and foolish for carrying on an affair. He is human.
Conservatives are mad because, divorced from his policy opinions (which are still mostly unknown/unconfirmed), they held out hope that he was the Next Big Thing for the GOP, and presumably this ends his political career.
I’m far more interested in what this administration will attempt to attach to him and the agency under his direction while he was “distracted” with his affair, IMO.
Sgt Steve on November 11, 2012 at 5:58 PM
Successful at what?
sharrukin on November 11, 2012 at 6:15 PM
As opposed to B.O. who is simply a “bringer of the light”.
Clink on November 11, 2012 at 6:18 PM
Um, you’ve had 4+ years and his name is Obama. You don’t seem to be up to the challenge.
I expect the press to pile on Obama in about a year as lame-duckness starts settling in and as a way to try to salvage their reps.
Difficultas_Est_Imperium on November 11, 2012 at 6:19 PM
I haven’t been impressed by him for a minute. Paying Muslims to kill Muslims and then cupping and protecting the nutsack of Islam lovingly was hardly something to admire.
BL@KBIRD on November 11, 2012 at 6:42 PM
I’m still waiting for him to tell me how he was drawn into the cult of Journolist.
Yeah, that piece isn’t going to happen.
Gordon Winslow on November 11, 2012 at 6:45 PM
Understatement of the decade
faraway on November 11, 2012 at 7:03 PM
Thesis: Petraeus cheated on his wife thus demonstrating how everything I wrote about him was not critical enough.
How are the two things related? We can all peculate, but the personal and professional errors of judgment have yet to be tied together.
How about less introspective garbage and more actual reporting? I forget myself. Reporting costs money and is hard. Carry on then. Hot Air custodians included.
An Objectivist on November 11, 2012 at 8:15 PM
The guy in charge of the CIA let his personal E-mail be used by a reporter he was banging, and that had to be brought to light by an FBI investigation. I would say they are tied together.
sharrukin on November 11, 2012 at 8:18 PM
I made a word that is borderline obscene… “peculate.”
Sharrukin, ok, but we must rethink his entire handling of Iraq because he cheated. I’m not defending the guy, but I’d like some reporting. I’m tired of these articles.
An Objectivist on November 11, 2012 at 8:24 PM
I look forward to the day when Obama’s palace guards are forced to fall on their pens.
OxyCon on November 11, 2012 at 8:29 PM
I think the argument could be made that Petraeus was a manufactured hero. This reporter he was sleeping with was one of his promoters and there were others as well such as the author of this piece.
The question is can we go back and take a hard look at what Petraeus did that makes him so special and if the answer is nothing, then we learn from that. We saw the same thing with Obama in 2008 on the left, and Romney after the Republican primaries in 2012. We discovered after the fact the painful reality that they were not what the brochures promised.
sharrukin on November 11, 2012 at 8:33 PM