Why Romney was caught by surprise by the election result
Even on the morning of the election, Romney’s senior advisers weren’t close to hedging. They said he was going to win “decisively.” It seemed like spin, but the Boston Globe reports that a fireworks display was already ordered for the victory. Romney and Ryan thought they were going to win, say aides. “We were optimistic. More than just cautiously optimistic,” says one campaign staffer. When Romney lost, “it was like a death in the family.”
How did the Romney team get it so wrong? According to those involved, it was a mix of believing anecdotes about party enthusiasm and an underestimation of their opponents’ talents. The Romney campaign thought Obama’s base had lost its affection for its candidate. They believed Obama would win only if he won over independent voters. So Romney focused on independents and the economy, which was their key issue. The Republican ground game was focused on winning those voters. “We thought the only way to win was doing well with independents and we were kicking ass with independents,” says a top aide. One senior adviser bet me that if Obama won Ohio, he would donate $1,000 per point to my favorite charity. (That would be a $10,000 hit since Romney lost Ohio but won independents by 10 points). In the end, Romney won independents nationally by five points—and it didn’t matter one bit…
In the final 10 days of the race, a split started to emerge in the two campaigns. The Obama team would shower you with a flurry of data—specific, measurable, and they’d show you the way they did the math. Any request for written proof was immediately filled. They knew their brief so well you could imagine Romney hiring them to work at Bain. The Romney team, by contrast, was much more gauzy, reluctant to share numbers, and relying on talking points rather than data. This could have been a difference in approach, but it suggested a lack of rigor in the Romney camp. On Election Day, the whole Romney ground-game flopped apart. ORCA, the much touted- computer system for tracking voters on Election Day, collapsed. It was supposed to be a high-tech approach to poll-watching, a system by which campaign workers would be able to track who voted. Those who had not yet voted could therefore be identified and then have volunteers tasked to finding them and getting them to the polls. ORCA was supposed to streamline the process, but it was never stress-tested. Field operatives never saw a beta version. They asked to see it, but were told it would be ready on Election Day. When they rolled it out Tuesday, it was a mess. People couldn’t log on and when they did, the fields that were supposed to be full of data were empty. “I saw a zero and I knew I wasn’t supposed to be seeing a zero,” said one campaign worker. A war room had been set up in the Boston Garden to monitor ORCA’s results, but in the end Romney and Ryan had to watch CNN to find out how their campaign was doing. In the end, the numbers guy was deprived of his numbers in more ways than one.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I think it’s been proven we were all surprised – not just Romney.
gophergirl on November 10, 2012 at 2:51 PM
And in my case heartbroken for our nation.
L
letget on November 10, 2012 at 2:54 PM
The strategy was not unreasonable. In retrospect, Romney’s team should have targeted some of Obama’s base as well as independents.
SAZMD on November 10, 2012 at 2:54 PM
Especially the talent for creative fraud. 141% voter turnout in St. Lucie county Florida? 100% for Obama in Cleveland? 119% for Obama in Boston? And on and on across the nation. Our elections process is a shambles and maybe we shouldn’t have been so quick to take exception to those UN monitors.
clippermiami on November 10, 2012 at 2:56 PM
For those who are talking about the 2016 election: what makes you think we will even have one? We didn’t have one in 2012.
davidk on November 10, 2012 at 3:01 PM
I’m sure the UN was there to assist in the fraud. They hate Republicans.
darwin on November 10, 2012 at 3:01 PM
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-louisiana-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/1wrvtngl
davidk on November 10, 2012 at 3:02 PM
The results don’t make any sense – It’s almost as if voter fraud were involved, but of course, that doesn’t happen in America, right?
Pork-Chop on November 10, 2012 at 3:04 PM
The media is examining every detail behind the scenes of the Romney campaign and writing thorough, exact stories. Somewhat like they examined Senator Barack Obama.
salem on November 10, 2012 at 3:05 PM
http://obamavoterfraud.blogspot.com/
davidk on November 10, 2012 at 3:05 PM
The 2012 Autopsy, chapter 2,439, the liver exam.
Limerick on November 10, 2012 at 3:07 PM
Speak for yourself. I was saying that Romney was doomed before he even got the nomination.
Stoic Patriot on November 10, 2012 at 3:12 PM
Look, all this coulda-shoulda-woulda is about patching up the GOP/RNC that lost instead of moving on to find a vision and a banner carrier.
Limerick on November 10, 2012 at 3:15 PM
I just got the “thank you” e-mail from Mitt and Ann. Made me sniffle all over again.
This loss has been just heartbreaking for so many reasons.
gophergirl on November 10, 2012 at 3:18 PM
I’d like to say I’m surprised. I’d like to.
gophergirl on November 10, 2012 at 3:19 PM
Romney’s people created a bubble of un-reality around him. Not the first person this has happened to.
AngusMc on November 10, 2012 at 3:25 PM
Well, it could have been worse. He could have hired Ed Morrissey as a poll consultant.
Armin Tamzarian on November 10, 2012 at 3:28 PM
If Romney knew there was a problem, maybe he could have been the turnaround artist many of us believe him to be. But he never knew.
SAZMD on November 10, 2012 at 3:29 PM
republicans are ahead of where the dems were in 2004. we’re close, but we need a real conviction conservative to seal the deal. someone who can appeal to all segments of the electorate. romney tried too hard to focus on “the middle class” instead of going for the broad, reagan approach.
therightwinger on November 10, 2012 at 3:37 PM
I don’t like doing those “FIFY” deals, so I’ll just say you accidentally typed “surprised” instead of “wrong.”
Dongemaharu on November 10, 2012 at 3:38 PM
Media absence.
the_nile on November 10, 2012 at 3:48 PM
The results dont make sense to you because you dont want them too. You were stuck in the hot air echo chamber. Every reasonable predictor had obama winning, cry fraud all you want. Romney was one of the worst candidates in GOP history
Flapjackmaka on November 10, 2012 at 4:06 PM
Why
RomneyHot Air was caught by surprise by the election result.FIFY
RayinVA on November 10, 2012 at 4:21 PM
You had me until the very end. I will never, ever be okay with the UN monitoring our elections–not only would they never see voter fraud if it favored the right people, but they have absolutely no business behaving as though they are over the United States. If there is a problem with our elections, we the people must make sure it is fixed. Right now, that would start with Romney lawyering up and demanding a full investigation into voter fraud and the disenfranchisement of our military. I’d like to say I know what we should do if he doesn’t, but I don’t–I’m just alarmed that we might subject America to an illegitimate presidency.
DrMagnolias on November 10, 2012 at 4:27 PM
The results
don’tmake sense to you because youdontwant them to.Every reasonable predictor had obama winning. Michael Barone is not a reasonable predictor?
You are a joke.
Basilsbest on November 10, 2012 at 5:06 PM
I agree..I know I was..
Dire Straits on November 10, 2012 at 5:13 PM
DIVORCE A DEMOCRAT
The very best thing that all of us on the right can do right now, libertarians and conservatives – is to separate ourselves from all the Democrats in our lives. Anyone you know who voted for Obama, tell them to take a hike. That includes, friends, family, co-workers, neighbors.
We’ve got to start being really nasty, vicious even. Use the ‘F’ bomb. Just write these people out of your lives. Vow never to speak to them again.
They endorse socialism. We endorse freedom. Why would we want to spend any time whatsoever being friendly with our enemies?
ericdondero on November 10, 2012 at 5:25 PM
As if no one had warned about the danger of focusing on independents and ignoring the base. Jeebus.
SparkPlug on November 10, 2012 at 5:28 PM
The Stupid Party didn’t listen enough to the Tea Party; the ones who brought them the historic 2010 landslide.
SparkPlug on November 10, 2012 at 5:31 PM
Really? All those “freedom endorsing” Republicans who gave us the Patriot Act?
Get bent.
RayinVA on November 10, 2012 at 5:36 PM
Yes, those freedom loving Republicans who oppose Islamo-Naziism and want to ensure that your lovely wife or girlfriend is not forced to wear an ugly black burka from head to toe.
ericdondero on November 10, 2012 at 5:57 PM
I was more surprised by what a dupe I was to vote for the shim sham man. Oh well, the republican party has lost this voter for life.
astonerii on November 11, 2012 at 10:46 AM