Comments on: Breaking: David Petraeus submits resignation as CIA director

By: PattyJ

PattyJ — Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:18:57 +0000

kim roy on November 9, 2012 at 3:16 PM

Maybe you’re right…sadly.

By: petefrt

petefrt — Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:11:36 +0000

Color me skeptical.

By: Rocks

Rocks — Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:15:40 +0000

Petraeus’ wife, Holly, also works in the Obama administration, for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Isn’t this the a new bureau setup by Dodd/Frank? How did his wife manage to get a job there? He is a fine general but whoever thought this guy was conservative was crazy. Cronyism, affairs….the guy is a Democrat for sure.

By: michaelthomas

michaelthomas — Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:46:10 +0000

I hope I never see you b1tching about the Lame Stream and their disgraceful journalistic practices.

HondaV65 on November 9, 2012 at 3:40 PM

I’m making comments on a blog. I’m not broadcasting “news” to millions of people between McDonald’s and Ford Trucks commercials.

So cool down.

By: michaelthomas

michaelthomas — Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:43:43 +0000

HondaV65 on November 9, 2012 at 3:40 PM ~~Chill fella. You are so defensive. Are you the one that fired him?~~

By: CycloneCDB

CycloneCDB — Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:42:03 +0000

I won’t believe any of the positive conspiracy theories here. I believed Breitbart’s kids had the Khalidi video or somehting because AB said that he’d be vetted this time. I was wrong. They had nothing. I keep waiting for the ball to bounce our way once…JUST ONCE with this crap. It’s never going to happen.

We are stuck with this guy and with the idiots that elected him. Period.

-Eeyore

By: HondaV65

HondaV65 — Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:40:55 +0000

You have to connect dots right now.

michaelthomas on November 9, 2012 at 3:38 PM

No you don’t. You can be responsible and stop slandering people with rumors and innuendo.

I hope I never see you b1tching about the Lame Stream and their disgraceful journalistic practices.

By: HondaV65

HondaV65 — Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:39:35 +0000

He was fired during the Benghazi attack at the very moment that he told the White House he was sending help despite orders to stand down.

General Ham’s second-in-command received the orders directly from the White House to have him removed – while the Benghazi attack was happening

michaelthomas on November 9, 2012 at 3:26 PM

You’re worse than the Lame Stream man. That story was never verified. Had it been – it would have been ALL OVER HA. It might have received a mention – but it was never hyped here as fact.

It is not fact until we have verified it.

By: michaelthomas

michaelthomas — Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:38:18 +0000

Was that ever verified?

I heard about it somewhere, but holy hell… relieving a General for trying to bring his people home…

Washington Nearsider on November 9, 2012 at 3:29 PM

I read it from an obscure news outlet, but that kind of news could only come from an obscure outlet. Does it sound plausible? To me, yes. It sounds exactly like how it would have gone down (IMO).

What at this point is “verified”? You have to connect dots right now.

By: HondaV65

HondaV65 — Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:37:06 +0000

Was that ever verified?

I heard about it somewhere, but holy hell… relieving a General for trying to bring his people home…

Washington Nearsider on November 9, 2012 at 3:29 PM

No that’s all tin foil sh1t that was NEVER verified.