Looks like millions of white voters stayed home on Tuesday
In other words, if our underlying assumption — that there are 7 million votes outstanding — is correct, then the African-American vote only increased by about 300,000 votes, or 0.2 percent, from 2008 to 2012. The Latino vote increased by a healthier 1.7 million votes, while the “other” category increased by about 470,000 votes…
Had the same number of white voters cast ballots in 2012 as did in 2008, the 2012 electorate would have been about 74 percent white, 12 percent black, and 9 percent Latino (the same result occurs if you build in expectations for population growth among all these groups). In other words, the reason this electorate looked so different from the 2008 electorate is almost entirely attributable to white voters staying home. The other groups increased their vote, but by less than we would have expected simply from population growth.
Put another way: The increased share of the minority vote as a percent of the total vote is not the result of a large increase in minorities in the numerator, it is a function of many fewer whites in the denominator…
My sense is these voters were unhappy with Obama. But his negative ad campaign relentlessly emphasizing Romney’s wealth and tenure at Bain Capital may have turned them off to the Republican nominee as well. The Romney campaign exacerbated this through the challenger’s failure to articulate a clear, positive agenda to address these voters’ fears, and self-inflicted wounds like the “47 percent” gaffe. Given a choice between two unpalatable options, these voters simply stayed home.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 3 4 5
Thats just stupid.
Anyone who did not recognize the threat to the nation after 4 years of crapping on the constitution and realizing that 4 more years and 2-3 more SCOTUS appointment might be something to pay attention to, and chose to sit on their crapper, is stupid.
We have a radical who is poised to appoint 4 or 5 SCOTUS judges, each with it being a lifetime position.
1 man placing the majority number of judges in the final decision making position when it comes to deciding constitutionality.
1 man.
A left wig radical.
And people sat on their crappers?? You know what that is??…it’s stupid.
Mimzey on November 8, 2012 at 2:53 PM
Exactly.
This is the difference between the left “purists” and the right “purists”.
The real purists on the left may want to see someone who would just take property and assets from people and “spread it around”, but if a candidate with a more moderate version of their ideology is on the docket, that’s who they vote for. I believe the idea behind it is to, at the bare minimum, hold the ground.
To many on the right don’t get the concept of sticking together and choose to hand the enemy a victory and then go admire themselves for the strength of their “principles”.
How’s this for a principle? Win the battle.
But nooooo…that would be weak or something.
Mimzey on November 8, 2012 at 3:07 PM
Republican does not equal conservative.
Romney was not conservative. His win would not be considered a won battle for conservatives.
It would have been a Pyrrhic victory. Yeah we won, look at the cost. Too many more victories like this and the war is lost.
Every battle you partake in has costs associated with it. If there is not a commensurate benefit for winning the battle then you are hurting yourself.
It was Romney’s and the republican party’s job to show the people what the voter gets for being involved and eventually voting. They failed to do so. I think he had a chance, a better one than I gave him credit for at the end of the primary, after the first debate to get those voters involved.
After the first debate though, Romney began to sell himself to the moderate independents. He gave conservatives an entire 90 minutes of attention, and once that was done it was back to the idea that they would eat the shit sammich and be f&cking happy about it.
He was wrong. He should have sold himself to the people who were wary of him, the conservatives. The moderates already were likely to accept him, his past proved to them that he was progressive.
astonerii on November 8, 2012 at 3:39 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 3 4 5