Why Obama should want a loss today
In fact, if Obama’s legacy matters at all to him and his supporters, he may want to hope for a loss on Tuesday. Because there’s no indication that a second term will be anything but disastrous for him.
There’s the immediate concerns — the fiscal cliff and sequestration, which will likely be difficult with a chastened GOP. But it’s actually the left that will make Obama’s winter lift an even heavier one. …
By defending Obama’s inaction and protecting his legacy, all his supporters are doing is jeopardizing it. The more cover he’s given, the less likely he is to take the kind of leadership stances he’ll need to to seriously address poverty, inequality, unemployment and stalled growth. These aren’t small issues, but small issues are where Obama’s preferred to live, choosing instead to tinker with short-term immigration solutions and roll back DOMA and Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. The success of his two biggest contributions — the stimulus and the Affordable Care Act — is ambiguous to say the least.
But the final reason Obama should be praying for a Romney win tomorrow, is that a scandal looms large on the horizon. Libya is not going away. In fact an Obama victory would ensure that House Republicans on the Oversight committee, like Darrell Issa and Jason Chaffetz, push even harder on the administration’s bungling of the Benghazi attack. The only way Obama escapes the brunt of upcoming investigations is if he loses, and Republicans refocus their lasers on the State Department.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
If he wins, he’ll think he’s invincible. He’s spent 4 years wiping his ass with the Constitution. What makes you think he can’t evade scrutiny for 4 more years?
The Count on November 6, 2012 at 10:33 AM
Obama was upset Romney might win and take credit for the inevitable recovery coming no matter who was elected. Obama with his taxes, EPA regulations, ObamaCare, reckless spending, “you didn’t build that” … not what I’d call a recipe for a recovery.
Paul-Cincy on November 6, 2012 at 10:34 AM
Spot on the count
cmsinaz on November 6, 2012 at 10:36 AM
Duh, so he can blame Romney for the next two months. The Bush excuse was starting to wear thin.
cozmo on November 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM
More time for golf!
Glenn Jericho on November 6, 2012 at 10:40 AM
That was FDR running for a third term. If you only consider elected presidents running for a single reelection, fourteen of the fifteen who won got more electoral votes the second time. The one who didn’t? Woodrow Wilson. So even if Obama wins, he’ll have something else in common with Wilson besides being an insufferable former college professor who believes he is so much smarter than everyone else that he need not even listen to others.
radjah shelduck on November 6, 2012 at 10:44 AM
He cares not for what other Presidents cared about. His sole purpose in life is to destroy and ravage America. Anther 4 years would allow him to achieve his goal. His only concern is what leftoids worldwide say about him – nothing else!
honsy on November 6, 2012 at 10:44 AM
For a much more lenient plea bargain?
Chip on November 6, 2012 at 10:47 AM
The investigations into Benghazi need to focus on revealing every last drop of truth surrounding the before, during and after in respect to how the Obama administration has handled the entire matter. Obama and his closest advisers are at the heart of it…and that fact shouldn’t be in any way, shape or form deemed to be any less important when he is out of office.
lynncgb on November 6, 2012 at 10:47 AM
That’s where she lost me…sorry but I will accept “it’s a race to close to call”, but an expectation that Obama will win?
Only a liberal expects that…any “journalist” that actually reads and is informed should know it’s too close to call…and people who are partisan (like me) say it’s a slam dunk for Romney/Ryan…
Let’s see who is right…the learned, educated, intellectual, journalist…or just a plain ol guy who posts on HotAir…
right2bright on November 6, 2012 at 10:49 AM
The president was the wrong man for the times, how out of step he has been with what the country has needed over the last four years. His party viewed their ownership of the House and the Senate and the White House as the time to implement an agenda that there was no money for, and did it on borrowed funds, and by forming the costs and the health programs to start a long time away from the time they voted for the health care bill. There is no Obama Care, just spending.
However, be aware, that if the republicans are able to fix the money, in MA, as soon as the money was fixed, liberals were eyeing the piles of surplus and rainy day funds. That is the prime time for an Obamalike agenda, because it always costs piles of money.
Fleuries on November 6, 2012 at 10:53 AM
Pffft
He’s toast and she’s making excuses
HotAirian on November 6, 2012 at 10:57 AM
I cut S. E. some slack, what with her being the token conservative on MSNBC/NBC News (outside of Scarborough). She’s fighting a losing battle over there.
Myron Falwell on November 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM
Your point is well taken. However, a second Obama term means that companies continue to hold onto their cash reserves and we double-dip right back into full recession. I don’t a corrupt media will be able to prop him up endlessly.
mwbri on November 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM
She’s real pretty but kind of dim.
esnap on November 6, 2012 at 11:01 AM
Oh it could so easily go away. Remember that thing called Fast and Furious? That’s pretty much gone and involved blatantly illegal acts and a lot more death (admittedly mostly Mexicans).
Barky’s been ‘getting away with it’ his entire life. He’s about as worried about Libya as he is about the sun
shining out of his azzrising tomorrow morning.CorporatePiggy on November 6, 2012 at 11:02 AM
Thinking as a Democrat -
Things are going to get worse in the short term, it will be useful to have Republicans in power to blame. Even though they will really have inherited the problems from the Dems. It took Reagan 2 years to turn Carter’s disaster around, the Republicans took a beating in 1982. Maybe if the Democrats manage to slow the recovery down, Obama can make a comeback in 2016.
zmdavid on November 6, 2012 at 11:07 AM
She’s a phony.
jawkneemusic on November 6, 2012 at 11:09 AM
Win or lose, Obama will be the first President in history that pardons himself!
Uniblogger on November 6, 2012 at 11:11 AM
Wrong again, genius. There are many political analysts on the right and the left who are saying that 0bama could pull off a win today. Thanks, in part, to the dirty tricks that Democraps are known for, and we are already seeing them happen.
We are all hoping for a Romney win, but it will take a lot more than wishful thinking to make it happen. The truth is, we won’t know who won until after the votes are counted.
UltimateBob on November 6, 2012 at 11:13 AM
More time to golf?
ProfShadow on November 6, 2012 at 11:13 AM
Cupp thinks Obummer will win?
I suddenly find her a little less hot.
trigon on November 6, 2012 at 11:15 AM
Romney will win. And Obama does want to win, but he can’t think of a good reason to vote for him and neither can his supporters.
We got this.
happytobehere on November 6, 2012 at 11:18 AM
Right up there with Carter’s.
davidk on November 6, 2012 at 11:25 AM
Throw her in with Brooks and Frumm.
davidk on November 6, 2012 at 11:26 AM
A: To avoid the inevitable UN arrest warrant?
4 years of escalating Obama drone strikes and now UN dispatches their keystone cops?
/UN-Mirandized!
Terp Mole on November 6, 2012 at 11:39 AM
I’ll take it one further… so he has Romney to blame when he announces he’s running in 2016.
crazy_legs on November 6, 2012 at 11:42 AM
Should be a quick investigation.
The US uses drones to blow up some dude with a name like Abu Fareed Zakaria.
Abu and anyone near him gets vaporized.
The end.
CorporatePiggy on November 6, 2012 at 11:45 AM
Right on SE, you simply gorgeous creature you!
KMC1 on November 6, 2012 at 11:47 AM
The first one was a nightmare already.
Learn how to write, S.E. Cupp
Now, go to Hades: Obama, Petraeus, Hillary, Biden, Rice and S.E. Cupp.
Schadenfreude on November 6, 2012 at 11:54 AM
S.E. is as insufferable as are a few other so-called rightie women on TV, or in print. For their purses they’ll do anything. Yack.
Schadenfreude on November 6, 2012 at 11:55 AM
The question is “Why America should send Obama to HI”
…because decency needs to win over thuggery.
Schadenfreude on November 6, 2012 at 11:58 AM
These cash reserves are largely held outside the US, avoiding taxes. One of the first things Romney will do is declare a tax holiday and this cash will come back and go directly into stockholders bank accounts in dividends and share buy backs. Removing capital gains means no one will pay taxes on this money, and once again, the average guy takes it up the wazoo.
That money is not going to go to new jobs, the economy won’t support that much growth. The fact is, if these companies wanted to spend on growth, they can borrow as much money as they need without touching their own cash. This moves the risk to the lender, provides tax benefits, and positively affects share value, by retaining capital.
RINOs are people too on November 6, 2012 at 11:58 AM
She’s been at MassivelyStupidNBC for a bit too long.
stukinIL4now on November 6, 2012 at 11:59 AM
Obama and Moochelle are set for life if he loses.
He may get life if he wins.
FRACK OBAMA!
profitsbeard on November 6, 2012 at 12:02 PM
If Romney isn’t able to “fix” everything Obama and his party broke, the Dems will claim that Obama could have.
If Romney IS able to improve the economy, the Dems will also claim that Obama would have.
If Obama gets a second shot and things get worse, the Dems will claim that even Romney couldn’t have fixed things (because working with those rascally Republicans is so hard).
If things do get better under Obama (which they may, because even that unlikely an event is theoretically possible), then the Dems will claim the country didn’t need Romney after all.
So long as Obama supporters control the media and the history departments, Obama “wins” regardless of the election outcome.
AesopFan on November 6, 2012 at 1:28 PM
If Obama didn’t move to the center after that midterm shellacking I can’t imagine why he would do so as a lame duck. He has never shown any practical propensity to abandon his partisan bunker for the sake of real world results. And he thereby coddles the Left as much as they enable him.
But it’s terribly sad that anyone should execrate Miss Cupp merely for failing to do an election eve Romney victory dance. Sad sad sad.
Seth Halpern on November 6, 2012 at 3:14 PM