Which election “fundamentals” will prove decisive?
For the Romney campaign, these Fundamentals stand out:
1. In six of the last 10 national polls, Mitt Romney is tied with Obama or ahead by 1 percentage point. As a practical matter, all 10 polls are tied because they are within the margin of error. Romney advisers don’t see how they can lose running this close to an incumbent president in times of economic distress.
2. Romney is running ahead of where Kerry was as Bush’s challenger. Romney’s RealClearPolitics.com average is 48.1 percent to Obama’s 48.5 percent. When Bush beat Kerry in 2000, his election-eve RCP average was 48.9 percent to Kerry’s 47.4 percent. Bush won 50.7 percent to 48.3 percent. In victory, Bush added roughly 10 million voters to his 2000 total. No one expects Obama to add 10 million vote to his 69.4 million total in 2008. In a smaller universe with less space between the challenger and incumbent, Team Romney smells victory.
3. GOP voters are consistently more enthusiastic than Democrats. No national poll suggests otherwise and Democratic anxiety is currently confined to this variable. If GOP voters and GOP-leaning independents swamp current Democratic turnout/modeling, Romney could prevail. Enthusiasm is fundamental to victory and defeat. Plenty of savvy GOP operatives, namely Karl Rove in 2006, predicted that ground-game superiority would blunt voter enthusiasm. It didn’t. The GOP got rolled and lost the House and the Senate. Presidential campaigns are different, but enthusiasm is the most treasured commodity down the stretch.
4. Independents appear to be leaning to Romney.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
No one seems to be talking about the Bradley Effect. I think it’s going to be a strong factor in this one.
Steven Den Beste on November 6, 2012 at 1:08 PM
Early Election Day turnout #s from Pasco County, FL:
http://wwww.pascovotes.com/turnout.asp
GOP 46%
Dem 31%
Ind 23%
This county went 51-48 for McCain in 2008, but suggest a MUCH larger Romney win.
Norwegian on November 6, 2012 at 1:08 PM
I posted previously and stand by my posts. Romney in a rout.
The schadenfreude will be near O.D. levels.
Skwor on November 6, 2012 at 1:08 PM
Coulter mentioned this on the radio yesterday. She cited three elements that give her confidence:
1. Bradley effect.
2. Undecideds break for the challenger (with incumbent under 50%)
3. Independents.
She said the combo of these three add up to a comfortable Romney win.
MassVictim on November 6, 2012 at 1:20 PM
Obama can’t even get a turnout with Stevie Wonder or Bruce Springsteen. If that reflects how Dems will turn out to vote, then (assuming the Dems don’t cheat out the wazoo) Romney has this in the bag.
The Rogue Tomato on November 6, 2012 at 1:31 PM
Election Fundamentals:
16 trillion; 23 million; 14.6%; no budget, ACA; thug; economically illiterate; anti-business; socialist; rape of Chrysler bondholders and other laws; closet Muslim; al qaeda rising; Benghazigate; Liar;
for starters…
even moronic push polls couldn’t save him.
Basilsbest on November 6, 2012 at 2:00 PM
We expected a Bradley Effect in 2008 that never materialized – what makes anyone think it will happen this time?
I think Romney will win, but I don’t believe in the Bradley Effect as applied to the presidential race. I think Romney will win because I believe they are over-sampling Dems, under-sampling GOP, and the independents are double digits for Romney.
Monkeytoe on November 6, 2012 at 2:53 PM