Muscle-flexing: Russian attack sub cruises to within 200 miles of east coast
The submarine was identified by its NATO designation as a Russian Seirra-2 class submarine believed to be based with Russia’s Northern Fleet. It was the first time that class of Russian submarine had been detected near a U.S. coast, said officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of anti-submarine warfare efforts.
One defense official said the submarine was believed to have been conducting anti-submarine warfare efforts against U.S. ballistic and cruise missile submarines based at Kings Bay, Georgia.
A second official said the submarine did not sail close to Kings Bay and also did not threaten a U.S. aircraft carrier strike group that was conducting exercises in the eastern Atlantic.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
More of Obama’s flexibility? Go get ‘em, Mitt!
John the Libertarian on November 6, 2012 at 7:25 PM
Flexibility.
Bishop on November 6, 2012 at 7:25 PM
Get out!
Bishop on November 6, 2012 at 7:25 PM
The surprise is that a Russina sub got underway. Russians are not getting a lot of sea time.
It’s really no big deal. The US champions freedom of the seas, and if needed we can vector some of our few remaining ASW assets to get some training.
Lots more of this was going on in the ’80s. My Gravitar picture is my destroyer shadowing a Victor-III sub hundreds of miles off the coast of South Carolina.
NaCly dog on November 6, 2012 at 7:26 PM
Reset Button shorted out I guess.
clippermiami on November 6, 2012 at 7:27 PM
Smart Power. TM.
KMC1 on November 6, 2012 at 7:31 PM
Thank Obama. His friends are just visiting.
Schadenfreude on November 6, 2012 at 7:36 PM
Change.
visions on November 6, 2012 at 7:36 PM
By ‘sub’ do they mean ‘bottom’ in Obamaspeak, or ship that goes underwater?
tom daschle concerned on November 6, 2012 at 7:37 PM
I think Putin wants Romney to win. Bad.
rdbrewer on November 6, 2012 at 7:37 PM
Crimson Tide.
BuckeyeSam on November 6, 2012 at 7:38 PM
I bet Putin is just as interested in stability as the rest of us. Obama doesn’t gin up a lot of confidence in that area.
(Arab spring, fx)
rdbrewer on November 6, 2012 at 7:39 PM
Yeah, we used to put subs in Soviet port waters. Probably still do it…
DStreete on November 6, 2012 at 7:46 PM
“Russia?..Russia is our biggest threat??..that’s cold war thinkin’”
B-Rack
Mimzey on November 6, 2012 at 7:50 PM
Ships that go under water
vcferlita on November 6, 2012 at 7:53 PM
They got those now??..can we sink them with bayonet holes?? Oh wait!..they are already under water! Now what??
Mimzey on November 6, 2012 at 8:04 PM
Probably depends on how many horses(-power) they’ve got!
IrishEyes on November 6, 2012 at 8:21 PM
As an ex-military member, I’m willing to bet a paycheck that the sub was under constant surveillance long before it got that close to the coast.
RoadRunner on November 6, 2012 at 8:36 PM