Second look at civility?
The call for civility as a spur to compromise dates to the nation’s founders. George Washington’s “Rules of Civility and Decent Behavior” left 110 points of advice for succeeding generations of politicians. (“Sleep not when others speak.”) Thomas Jefferson offered prescriptions rooted in his wielding of the Senate gavel as vice president: “No one is to disturb another (person who is speaking) by hissing, coughing, spitting, speaking or whispering to another.”
The public can only hope that after this election something both civil and creative might be possible in Congress. Note that Congress actually has a Civility Caucus, though it has gathered only 14 members in seven years. This is rather embarrassing, considering there are 200-plus members in the Congressional Wine Caucus, a group that might arguably offer stronger elixir for the gridlock on Capitol Hill.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Yes, let’s let Obama accuse Romney of being a heartless greedy capitalist who takes away the health care of a retiree resulting in his wife’s painful death. And let’s let the Dems accuse Ryan of wanting to push granny off a cliff in her wheel chair and force grandpa to eat dog food. Let’s let the libs accuse Republicans of being racists.
And then when the campaign is over let’s get the NYT to say that both sides need to become more civil.
Then there’s that thing about Chimpy Bushitler.
There are no greater hypocrites than libs and lefties.
farsighted on November 6, 2012 at 8:00 AM
The NYT can start acting in a civil manner any day now.
No law is preventing it!
ajacksonian on November 6, 2012 at 8:01 AM
Obama, whom the NYT supports, aids, and abets, runs one of the dirtiest and most negative campaigns in history, starting in the spring of 2012, and when its all over the NYT calls for both sides to be more civil in the future.
The NYT should be ignored.
farsighted on November 6, 2012 at 8:03 AM
Despite the results of their published polls, I guess the NYT knows their side is going to lose. Time to be “civil”.
moo on November 6, 2012 at 8:16 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2