Democrats’ bid to retake the House falters
The president may well win reelection, but there’s little question he hasn’t had the same kind of top-of-the-ticket pull demonstrated four years ago.
Unlike in 2008, when Barack Obama’s national numbers helped lift up Democratic congressional candidates across the map, the president has had far less impact this time around. And for the Democrats in conservative districts in the South and Rust Belt, Obama’s presence on the ballot has been more hurt than help.
That dynamic, perhaps more than any other, Democrats say, kept them from stirring up the kind of wave conditions they needed to stage a House takeover this year. Races that would have drifted in the Democrats’ direction four years ago required far more of a push this time.
“There was a wave that was supporting us in many different ways in 2008, and obviously this was a very different election,” said Paul Maslin, a Democratic pollster.
Obama’s poor first debate performance also caused a downdraft for vulnerable House Democrats.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
What? Pelosi said it was a done deal!
MikeA on November 5, 2012 at 8:27 AM
It’s adorable how this whole piece is about how Obama is an unbelievable drag on the Dems yet it keeps saying Obama has a good chance of winning. The Dems are pathetic.
happytobehere on November 5, 2012 at 8:28 AM
Very selfish and poor management to bet all of the chips on Obama
thebrokenrattle on November 5, 2012 at 8:29 AM
There was a bid?
Gatsu on November 5, 2012 at 8:31 AM
It’s as if liberals completely forgot about 2010.
Capitalist Infidel on November 5, 2012 at 8:32 AM
They just can’t get it through their dense skulls that most Americans are turned off by liberal ideology.
Most adults understand the difference between fantasy and reality. Yes, it would be awesome for everyone to have free healthcare, free condoms, free phones, free housing, free whatever. That would be just a fabulous life for everyone if that was possible… but it’s not reality.
ButterflyDragon on November 5, 2012 at 8:34 AM
They did. If reality disagrees with their fantastical beliefs, they skew reality and refuse to accept it.
ButterflyDragon on November 5, 2012 at 8:39 AM
I don’t know how Obama can get re-elected if the dems can,t pick up just one, net seat in the house.
Vince on November 5, 2012 at 8:42 AM
So, the Obama campaign apparently believes that Obama’s 2008 numbers are an accurate reflection of the electorate — even though there is no movement to democrats in House races.
Revenant on November 5, 2012 at 8:44 AM
“…bid to retake the House falters”
Yet David Gregory and NBC would have us believe Obama is poised to win with 310+ EC votes tomorrow. Media bubble never ceases to amaze…
gaius on November 5, 2012 at 8:44 AM
I guess they eventually had to come down off those SERIOUS medications that had them hallucinating about retaking the House.
michaelo on November 5, 2012 at 8:54 AM
“The inability of House Democrats to pick off a good number of seats from one of the most unpopular House majorities in modern history will cause a lot of soul-searching in the party come Wednesday.”
Wait – what? WHO’s saying the GOP is the most unpopular House majority in modern history? I’m detecting a bit of bias here.
The congress as a whole has a horrible approval rating – because of stall tactics by ‘Dirty’ Harry Reid in the Senate and the strong-arming of the Democrats by Pelosi in the House. It’s not just the GOP in the House’s fault – they are all guilty. And that includes Obama and the carp he has been sending to Congress to be voted on.
As soon as we get some better leaders in the House and Senate (IE: boot Pelosi and Reid) and get some cooperation FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY, instead of trying to jam up the other side of the aisle just to make your own party look good, then the approval ratings will start to rise again.
Timothy S. Carlson on November 5, 2012 at 8:57 AM
Pelose says, “We have to reelect Obama so we can see what his plans for the next four years are.”
Uniblogger on November 5, 2012 at 8:59 AM
Good comment, but you misspelled her name. It should be “Pelouse.”
Dextrous on November 5, 2012 at 9:01 AM
Actually, the ‘rats may lose seats in the House.
Which begs the question… how does Obozo winning square with that possibility?
(I know, it’s a trick question.)
CPT. Charles on November 5, 2012 at 9:10 AM
Yes, and my bid to marry Anne Hathaway has also faltered… in that it was doomed at the start and nobody anywhere had any realistic faith that it would happen.
Interesting definition of “faltered” they’re using.
gekkobear on November 5, 2012 at 9:13 AM
You too?
She’s a real heartbreaker, that one.
lorien1973 on November 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM
After we win this it is not over. The media and schools must be taken on.
GardenGnome on November 5, 2012 at 9:24 AM
Anyone notice that Politico referred to Allen West as a “smashmouth” in the piece.
Isn’t that sort of a racist term? Big-lipped Sambo.
If a white Republican or Fox News had called a Black Democrat a “smashmouth” don’t you think it’d be all over MSNBC, CNN, HuffPo, WaPo and the rest of the lib media?
ericdondero on November 5, 2012 at 9:39 AM
In truth, aren’t Republicans in line to pick up about five seats?
I hope Dems get drubbed across the board tomorrow.
BuckeyeSam on November 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM
Fixed. Not that your comment was inaccurate or anythig.
UltimateBob on November 5, 2012 at 10:25 AM
Seriously, we need to take back the Senate too (although that’s a long shot) so that we can repeal 0bamacare and steer clear of the fiscal cliff.
UltimateBob on November 5, 2012 at 10:27 AM