The incredible shrinking president
But a funny thing happened over the next six weeks: Obama’s own cue balls shriveled. Biden had offered up a deft campaign slogan encompassing both domestic and foreign policy: “Osama’s dead and General Motors is alive.” But, as the al-Qaeda connections to Benghazi dribbled out leak by leak, the “Osama’s dead” became a problematic boast and, left to stand alone, the General Motors line was even less credible. Avoiding the economy and foreign affairs, Obama fell back on Big Bird, and binders, and bayonets, just to name the “B”s in his bonnet. At the second presidential debate, he name-checked Planned Parenthood, the General Motors of the American abortion industry, half a dozen times, desperate to preserve his so-called gender gap. Yet oddly enough, the more furiously Obama and Biden have waved their binders and talked up Sandra Fluke, the more his supposed lead among women has withered away. So now he needs to enthuse the young, who turned out in such numbers for him last time. Hence, the official campaign video (plagiarized from Vladimir Putin of all people) explaining that voting for Obama is like having sex. The saddest thing about that claim is that, for liberals, it may well be true.
Both videos — the one faking Obamagasm and the one faking a Benghazi pretext — exemplify the wretched shrinkage that befalls those unable to conceive of anything except in the most self-servingly political terms. Both, in different ways, exemplify why Obama and Biden are unfit for office. One video testifies to a horrible murderous lie at the heart of a head of state’s most solemn responsibility, the other to the glib shallow narcissism of a pop-culture presidency, right down to the numbing relentless peer pressure: C’mon, all the cool kids are doing it; why be the last hold-out?









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Love me some Steyn. But in order to shrink, he had to have once been big.
Now other than being a big pile of bovine excrement, our darling SCOAMF has never been big in any positive sense.
platypus on October 27, 2012 at 8:12 PM
Des Moines Register Endorses Romney
nitzsche on October 27, 2012 at 8:14 PM
I’m trying to get my head around how walking on water causes shrinkage.
fogw on October 27, 2012 at 8:22 PM
WOW!
happytobehere on October 27, 2012 at 8:23 PM
Faster. Please.
faraway on October 27, 2012 at 8:24 PM
Wow! It would be great if this helped Mitt take Iowa! This really is kind of a BFD.
BettyRuth on October 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM
I second the WOW!!! I guess the headline should be: Liberal paper endorses Republican. The last Republican they endorsed was Richard Nixon…Wow!!! They freaking endorses Jimmy Carter…TWICE!!!
I guess Obama really pissed them off with the secrecy. That told them all they needed to know about him. He’s not a president anymore, he was seeing himself as King.
Chudi on October 27, 2012 at 8:31 PM
The propinquity of an election often does that to flailing Presidents.
flataffect on October 27, 2012 at 8:43 PM
Sorry Steyn, you’re awesome but this Des Moines Register thing is too much. Here’s their past endorsements…
• 1976: Jimmy Carter (D) – won
• 1980: Jimmy Carter (D) – lost
• 1984: Walter Mondale (D) – lost
• 1988: Michael Dukakis (D) – lost
• 1992: Bill Clinton (D) – won
• 1996: Bill Clinton (D) – won
• 2000: Al Gore (D) – lost
• 2004: John Kerry (D) – lost
• 2008: Barack Obama (D) – won
BFD indeed.
happytobehere on October 27, 2012 at 8:50 PM
Good call by the Register. This is the kind of thing which really could put us over the top in IA.
The Count on October 27, 2012 at 8:54 PM
One of Steyn’s best ever, methinks. Awesome stuff.
The possibility of Romney winning is finally starting to sink in with me. I’m wondering how the loony lib left will treat Obama. I’m hoping they’ll treat him like a loser who betrayed the left (on gay marriage, Guantanamo, Patriot Act, ‘kill list’, etc.) while accomplishing very little in return. But more likely they’ll circle the wagons and say he was a victim of bad press (irony of ironies), Bush’s economy, and eeeevil rethuglican conspiracies.
Splashman on October 27, 2012 at 8:54 PM
I wonder how many women see the “First Time” ad and suddenly realize that they are being talked down to.
An eighteen year old might not perceive it, but what about women over the age of, say, 23 or 24?
Dextrous on October 27, 2012 at 8:58 PM
If Obama loses, they will treat him like a Messiah who was crucified by a sinning world, but who has risen to heaven where he can worshiped as a Deity.
Dextrous on October 27, 2012 at 9:01 PM
He never had any.
If you recall Hillary’s face at the return of the 4 caskets, you know what happened. May both of them go to Hades, pronto.
Fool me once, stupid leftists…but a 2nd time? Suffocate from what you consume, the sh*t of Obama, not Beluga caviar.
Mark Steyn needs a one hour show on Fox.
Schadenfreude on October 27, 2012 at 9:02 PM
Come on, 0bama can’t lose, not after “coming out” on gay marriage, right?
Right?
Rebar on October 27, 2012 at 9:04 PM
My liberal friends (I know, I know) seem to be leaning towards anger at Axelrod at this point. They think that Obama was a bit too lucky too soon in politics. Rahm Emmanuel told him not to pursue Obamacare in his first term, etc. They have also talked about a lack of compelling vision for a second term.
He’ll be treated about how we’d expect. As a guy that has some gifts, mainly very convincingly reading soft platitudes from a teleprompter and taking on strawmen, but that lacked significant experience, work ethic and strategic political understanding. He’ll be thought of as a reverse Lyndon Johnson is what I’m hearing.
happytobehere on October 27, 2012 at 9:04 PM
This is supposedly the guy with the foreign policy expertise in this pitiful administration.
Basilsbest on October 27, 2012 at 9:47 PM
Wow, happytobehere, do ya think? At least they grasp that much!
GWB on October 28, 2012 at 12:13 AM
Well, yeah it seems stupid to us. But you have to realize how far they’ve gone in their thought processes. All the way from the “Lightbringer” to a “bit lucky too soon” “shoulda listened to Rahm” etc.
It’s not easy being a liberal. It requires huge amounts of effort just to keep track of what you’re supposed to believe today much less four years hence!
happytobehere on October 28, 2012 at 12:57 AM
He backed away from that:
http://twitchy.com/2012/10/27/buh-bye-gay-lo-obama-devolves-on-same-sex-marriage-and-defense-against-marriage-act/
cptacek on October 28, 2012 at 1:26 AM
Unpossible!
We’ve been told countless times, even by our very own Allahpundit, that gay marriage is so popular the GOP is doomed – dooooooomed - unless it embraces it.
What gives?
Rebar on October 28, 2012 at 3:10 AM
Ideally replacing either O’Reilly or Hannity. Both are insufferable.
CorporatePiggy on October 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM