President Romney would have Obama to thank for a recovery or something
Consider the two most successful presidents of recent decades. Ronald Reagan is often credited with sparking an economic renaissance by defeating inflation and deregulating the economy. But it was Jimmy Carter’s appointment of Paul Volcker as chairman of the Federal Reserve that spelled the death knell for inflation (not to mention Carter’s reelection bid), and the deregulation of airlines, trucking and railroads all began under Carter’s watch.
Similarly, the economic boom during Bill Clinton’s presidency was kick-started by an extended decline in long-term interest rates, which began with the budget deal George H.W. Bush signed in 1990 at great personal cost. And if you want to go really big-picture, the technology bubble that gilded Clinton’s second term can be traced to investments in computer-network technology that began under President Dwight Eisenhower in the 1950s…
Paradoxically, the same forces that made for such a weak recovery during Obama’s first term suggest that the next four years will be better, regardless of who holds the White House. Right now, businesses, households and governments are all trying to wrestle down their debts. That “deleveraging” saps spending and blunts the power of low interest rates. But eventually it ends, on average six to seven years after the debt (as a percentage of GDP) peaks, according to the McKinsey Global Institute and a study by economists Carmen and Vince Reinhart.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
So Bush is to blame for every bad thing in the past 4 years.
And for the next 4, when Romney is president, Obama will take credit for how Romney pulls our butts out of the fire.
vityas on October 8, 2012 at 8:55 AM
It sure looks like prissy Chrissy “Bad Acid” Matthews has been sharing his stash with more than Maureen Dowd.
viking01 on October 8, 2012 at 8:56 AM
K, thnkx. Bye.
Marcus on October 8, 2012 at 8:57 AM
Riiiiiight. That’s the same crap that Obama himself has reportedly been telling people according to that Politico book that came out last month. He’s super PO’d about the prospect of Romney getting all the credit for the inevitable economic recovery that’s right around the corner. Dude is living in a fantasy world.
If anything, I’m deathly afraid that the economy will go back into recession no matter what President Romney does early next year and the GOP could get blamed for it come November 2014.
Doughboy on October 8, 2012 at 8:59 AM
Yeah, right. When Romney makes dozens of policy changes that immediately preceed an immediate rebound of the economy it is only the delayed effect of 4 years of policies during which the economy experienced a steady decline.
scrubjay on October 8, 2012 at 9:01 AM
Well,
If Obama wasn’t such a SCoaMF then the country wouldn’t be in such bad shape.
If the country wasn’t in such bad shape, then Obama could get re-elected easily.
Since Obama will, by all things holy, lose the election, then yeah, Romney can thank Obama for being such a failure at being a president to make it more likely that Romney would be elected.
But otherwise, Obama can “kiss my grits” is the appropriate response.
ProfShadow on October 8, 2012 at 9:03 AM
Yeah, one president will keep 0bamacare and all the business killing regulations. One will not.
There is a clear choice.
cozmo on October 8, 2012 at 9:07 AM
Obama has extended the recession by 3 years making a Romney recovery possible. All hail Obama.
forest on October 8, 2012 at 9:07 AM
Ummmmm, no.
I think many of our problems right now have been aggravated by an undeclared capital strike. Ayn Rand was wrong about one thing: You don’t need a John Galt to organize a capital strike. Entrepreneurs will spontaneously strike to keep from throwing good money after bad. The moment it’s clear the looters are on their way out, the strike’s over. That alone can make 2013 a really good year, provided Romney wins.
All that said, it’s good to see a switch from, “Well, in 0bama’s next term he should…” to, “But if Romney wins there will be a plague of locusts o’er the land. LOCUSTS I’m tellin’ ya.”
Sekhmet on October 8, 2012 at 9:13 AM
I’m glad to see that the WAPO has reached the “acceptance” phase of Obama’s loss.
lorien1973 on October 8, 2012 at 9:14 AM
Better sue Gallup.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/157841/nongovernment-job-creation-stalls.aspx
Romney is a turn around artist, a fix it guy. In MA they let him have carte blanche to fix it. Now they don’t want YOU to do the same. Hypocrites.
Fleuries on October 8, 2012 at 9:16 AM
Obama was the new Fire Chief that inherited a garage on fire and then because of his ineptitude he let the garage, the house and the next door neighbor’s houses burn to ground all the time screaming, “It’s all the fault of Fire Chief George Bush!”
————
Clinton left Bush with a stock market bubble crashing economy…but did Clinton ever get any blame for that?
albill on October 8, 2012 at 9:17 AM
Obama to Mitt…
“Here buddy- here’s 6 trillion more in debt and a new social program that will create another huge hole in our budget… Not to mention my wet blanket economic reforms to curb any growth. Enjoy the vibrant recovery buddy”
The only thing Mitt would be thankful for is O setting the bar so low. And when Mitt gets GDP to 5, lets not let the media forget how we should be happy with 1.5.
Bensonofben on October 8, 2012 at 9:17 AM
So the Reagan economic recovery doesn’t start until two full years after Carter is bounced from office, but the recovery was Carter’s doing?
It’s confirmed, the left are either delusional, psychotic parasites, or mendacious, psychotic parasites. There is no third option.
Thomas More on October 8, 2012 at 9:21 AM
Cuckoo
cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 9:21 AM
The fact is, if Obama had paid attention to Jobs instead of indulging in Obamacare for two years, he would be impossible to unseat, and millions of Americans would not have lost their jobs due to forclosure. It’s not THE BANKS fault they did not have a job/good job in the Obama New Normal.
Fleuries on October 8, 2012 at 9:27 AM
This.
WisRich on October 8, 2012 at 9:51 AM
That’ll work.
Bye Barack.
profitsbeard on October 8, 2012 at 10:47 AM
Hilarious. You can’t make this stuff up.
Ward Cleaver on October 8, 2012 at 10:53 AM
What a load of krap.
magicbeans on October 8, 2012 at 11:16 AM
Technically this might actually be true. If anyone other than Obama had been in office, odds are good jobs would have started to recover years ago. Obama (and congressional Democrat) policies have played a huge role in creating fear and stagnation. The mere act of getting Obama out of the White House will probably have a positive effect all by itself.
Blacklake on October 8, 2012 at 11:19 AM
I’m totally okay with crediting former President Obama with the success of the Romney administration. By all means let that credit begin on January 20th.
DarthBrooks on October 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM
They’ll have a good argument chronologically, ’cause GDP estimates and forecasts by January 20, 2013 will be upwards of 4% (and necessarily skyrocketing) when Romney is sworn in and how could it be possible he was responsible when he hadn’t done anything yet besides giving Obama a whomping on Nov 6th.
Dusty on October 8, 2012 at 11:25 AM
TRUE!!!
By leaving office, Obama makes recovery possible!!!
/sarc>
landlines on October 8, 2012 at 12:31 PM