Is Obama overrated as a candidate?
First, he’s a terrible faker. Obama is simply not good at acting as though he is happy to be somewhere he’s not or pretending that every person he meets is the single most important person he has ever met. Obama wasn’t thrilled (to say the least) about the man he was debating last Wednesday, and it showed. Big time. (In that, Obama is the polar opposite of the last Democratic president, Bill Clinton. Clinton’s greatest political gift was his ability to make wherever he was seem like exactly where he wanted to be.)
Second, Obama is, at heart, a political pragmatist who relies much more on analysis and caution than gut instinct. He stuck with a prose-over-poetry convention speech when it became clear that the fundamentals of the race were moving in his favor. And, even as Romney repeatedly bashed him during the debate, Obama avoided going deeply negative on the Republican with attacks on his “47 percent” comments or his time spent at Bain Capital. (Even Obama’s most daring decision — to run for president after just two years in the Senate — was born of careful calculation, not willy-nilly cavalierness.)
“He’s a cautious man— been like that his whole life,” said one senior Democratic strategist granted anonymity to speak candidly about the party’s top elected official. “It’s him. He doesn’t throw punches.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Yah, ya think?
thebrokenrattle on October 8, 2012 at 10:58 AM
He has no problem throwing punches with totus
Puhleeze
cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 10:58 AM
Let’s make a much shorter list here. What is Obama underrated for?
NotCoach on October 8, 2012 at 10:59 AM
Depends on what you mean. Obama seems to be able to believe whatever he wants to, evidence aside.
Though it does seem that he can’t really fake things he doesn’t believe in that way.
Count to 10 on October 8, 2012 at 11:00 AM
Right conclusion, but the reasoning is complete fantasy.
forest on October 8, 2012 at 11:00 AM
He throws like a girl.
Most of the time he throws hissy fits.
An “overrated candidate”? No, he’s a fraud.
Cody1991 on October 8, 2012 at 11:01 AM
Ah yeah, another article for the “he-is-too-good-and-virtuous-to-win-a-debate”-folder.
Valkyriepundit on October 8, 2012 at 11:02 AM
What is this, a vetting of the president? Do tell.
reddevil on October 8, 2012 at 11:03 AM
He is not a terrible faker. He is a complete faker. He’s been faking it for five years. He is terrible at being called out on his fakery. He always has been. He simply doesn’t take interviews or do press conferences. He only gives prepared remarks without questions and the media go along with it. So now he’s in a real bad spot because he has a record and he cannot run on his fake Hope and Change. He simply is terrible at being real.
magicbeans on October 8, 2012 at 11:03 AM
Yes. Next question.
MikeA on October 8, 2012 at 11:03 AM
Hahaha… Can’t get past the first sentence of this one.
petefrt on October 8, 2012 at 11:04 AM
This is because he is a borderline sociopath. He tries to act in what he perceives to be an acceptable manner without knowing what an acceptable manner is.
NotCoach on October 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM
A
terriblepathological faker.PragmatistIdeologue.Well, that’s two strikes. Three and yer out.
petefrt on October 8, 2012 at 11:08 AM
How much CYA can you give a man for one stinking debate? It’s just ridiculous.
Is “acting” a euphemism for lying here? This is another lame attempt to suggest Romney won by lying.
And NO, Obama isn’t a cautious man. If he were then he would have taken longer to squeeze out that turd of Obamacare than it will take to finish the “investigation” into what happened in Benghazi.
He ran in 2008 to get his name out there. He didn’t believe in a million years he would win which explains why he is such an inept President.
BTW. Romney should definitely use that line in the debate.
Why is the Obama administration can force through Obamacare quicker than the time his administration is saying it will take to “investigate” Benghazi?
Rocks on October 8, 2012 at 11:09 AM
He’s overrated in every possible way imaginable.
ButterflyDragon on October 8, 2012 at 11:10 AM
OK, let me re-write this correctly. Just reverse it all
faraway on October 8, 2012 at 11:12 AM
It has taken the WaPo over four years to ask this question and they wonder why Old Media credibility now ranks somewhere well below crack-hos and pedophiles?
viking01 on October 8, 2012 at 11:12 AM
It should read: He’s terrible and is a faker.
Liberals adore him because he’s half black. Nobel committee gave him the peace price because he’s half black and a socialist. Today two scientists received the Nobel medical price for stem cell research, something that can actually help humans. Doesn’t that make Obambi’s premature peace price a big joke?
poxoma on October 8, 2012 at 11:14 AM
a fawning media continues to polish a turd.
booter on October 8, 2012 at 11:15 AM
Not really, it is just that a large proportion of the people in the nation, particularly people in the media are morons, so anyone slightly more gifted than moron with a D after their name are automatically considered gods. Who would you rather vote for Stalin (D) or Stalin (R)?
astonerii on October 8, 2012 at 11:16 AM
Fictional prose is alive and well at WAPO.
Skwor on October 8, 2012 at 11:16 AM
Someone else said it..
Obama is the result of Affirmative Action meeting the Peter Principle.
HumpBot Salvation on October 8, 2012 at 11:16 AM
Yes, as we’ve seen, Obama is perfectly willing to throw punches — so long as his opponent isn’t in the room to throw punches back.
Obama is more than willing to call Romney a criminal, a liar, a corporate raider, a tax evader, and even a murderer — in his stump speeches and commercials. He’s full of fake bravado when there is nobody around to call him on it.
Just read a piece from one of Obama’s Harvard Law classmates who said he was exactly the same way in law school. Wouldn’t take anybody on in person in a debate in class, but not because he was too “decorous” or “courteous,” but because he’s basically a coward.
AZCoyote on October 8, 2012 at 11:17 AM
They both suck. I’m a StalinBot.
NotCoach on October 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM
The sycophant media of 2008 campaigned FOR Obama. They made sure he looked Presidential. He covered for his thin resume, and ineptitude with cool camera shots and heavily edited talking points with dramatic flair. Obama is a made for TV President directly from central casting.
portlandon on October 8, 2012 at 11:21 AM
He’s just too good for us miserable slobs. Maybe he should be President of Heaven or something.
DarthBrooks on October 8, 2012 at 11:22 AM
So I guess this is why he has never really done his job as President, he hates meeting and having to work with people he does not like.
When the going gets tough, and he doesn’t feel like meeting world leaders at the UN, he hops aboard AF1 and heads to New York to appear on the View to refer to himself as eye candy.
He is not the President of the United States, he’s the President of Jay-Z, Beyonce, George Clooney, and elites who kiss his a$$ and tell him how great he is.
UltimateBob on October 8, 2012 at 11:25 AM
It’s just another bunch of excuses for his poor performance.
Blake on October 8, 2012 at 11:27 AM
These types of articles are just a set-up to cushion his next colossal debate failure. “He’s too busy presidenting; it’s beneath him to defend his position to mere mortals; he’s not a bad decision-maker—he’s just abundantly cautious!!” Repeat ad nauseum and enough people will believe it to drag his carcase across the finish line.
jdpaz on October 8, 2012 at 11:27 AM
What about those passive-aggressive third finger itches?
vityas on October 8, 2012 at 11:27 AM
Whadya mean?
Don’t call my bluff.
Second, Obama is, at heart, a political pragmatist who relies much more on analysis and caution than gut instinct.
Whadya mean?
I think that throughout my political career I’ve shown not only an instinct but a desire to find common ground.
LOL
Fallon on October 8, 2012 at 11:30 AM
Absolutely incredible that this old saw is still being bandied about.
Clinton’s twice as good, at the very least. I swear, Barack can’t even hold my attention for a solid 30 seconds. He’s painfully, painfully boring, especially when he trots out aging, Scotch-taped together bits from his watery stump speeches.
I’ve read grocery store receipts that are more interesting than this guy’s tripe.
JRCash on October 8, 2012 at 11:32 AM
Who, in Zero’s own words, did (does?) coke every time he could afford it?
Cautious like Keith Moon, more likely.
viking01 on October 8, 2012 at 11:34 AM
Plenty of science fiction on display in the WaPo comments! The always hilarious Ferguson Foont leads the way…
Del Dolemonte on October 8, 2012 at 11:36 AM
Is the WaPo also known as the Washington Compost?
Resist We Much on October 8, 2012 at 11:40 AM
We have all known burnout dopers like obama – he is lazy and worthless and OVERRATED at everything he does by the lib media, because he is an ultra liberal and he is mulatto – he has nothing positive to offer America, and he never did.
Pork-Chop on October 8, 2012 at 11:47 AM
Present.
obladioblada on October 8, 2012 at 11:56 AM
Yes!
Is Obama overrated as a president? Yes!
Is Obama overrated as a legal scholar? Yes!
Is Obama overrated as a speaker? Yes!
Is Obama overrated? YES!!!
St Gaudens on October 8, 2012 at 12:02 PM
Yes, but that insults compost itself, which actually has a useful function.
Del Dolemonte on October 8, 2012 at 12:06 PM
What?
toliver on October 8, 2012 at 12:07 PM
Only to the media, who could not conceive of Obama having any flaws at all.
tom on October 8, 2012 at 1:53 PM
Bottom line.
petefrt on October 8, 2012 at 2:20 PM