Fears of error and fraud rise as absentee voting increases
The board tossed out some ballots because they arrived without the signature required on the outside of the return envelope. It rejected one that said “see inside” where the signature should have been. And it debated what to do with ballots in which the signature on the envelope did not quite match the one in the county’s files.
“This ‘r’ is not like that ‘r,’ ” Judge Augustus D. Aikens Jr. said, suggesting that a ballot should be rejected.
Ion Sancho, the elections supervisor here, disagreed. “This ‘k’ is like that ‘k,’ ” he replied, and he persuaded his colleagues to count the vote.
Scenes like this will play out in many elections next month, because Florida and other states are swiftly moving from voting at a polling place toward voting by mail.








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
The GOP must be doing well with absentee ballots this year or we wouldn’t be seeing something like this in the NYT.
AUINSC on October 7, 2012 at 7:44 PM
Don’t be silly. Voter fraud has never ever happened in the history of the world. Just ask a Dem.
Missy on October 7, 2012 at 7:45 PM
setting the stage for Dem legal challenges and conspiracy theories
commodore on October 7, 2012 at 7:46 PM
Keep trying to disenfranchise people, it’s hilarity.
mythicknight on October 7, 2012 at 7:48 PM
Hanging Chads 2.0…ugh, gird your loins, everyone.
ellifint on October 7, 2012 at 7:49 PM
Odd how this becomes a concern this year.
SouthernGent on October 7, 2012 at 7:50 PM
Я считаю, что совершенно неважно, кто и как будет в партии голосовать; но вот что чрезвычайно важно, это – кто и как будет считать голоса.
cthulhu on October 7, 2012 at 7:52 PM
They are scared witless:
cozmo on October 7, 2012 at 7:53 PM
When you enfranchise the dead and Mickey Mouse, you disenfranchise us.
The Count on October 7, 2012 at 7:58 PM
You know this administration is going to do something sneaky with the military absentee ballots so that none of them count.
Wigglesworth on October 7, 2012 at 8:06 PM
How did this get past the
censorseditors at the NYT? They’ve been running attack piece after attack piece for months insisting that there’s no such thing as voter fraud, EVER.Red Cloud on October 7, 2012 at 8:08 PM
Never before have I ever seen such a blatant display of racism by the New York Times in my life.
/sarc
Glenn Jericho on October 7, 2012 at 8:14 PM
Exactly, voter fraud only exists in absentee ballots, because conservatives and the military tend to use them more.
Nothing to see here.
thurman on October 7, 2012 at 8:18 PM
Overheard at a NY Times editor’s meeting last Tuesday:
“Well, if our idiot Obama completely FUBARs the debate tomorrow night and his prospects continue to worsen for November let’s run this article on Sunday.”
viking01 on October 7, 2012 at 8:30 PM
If you don’t even know where to put your signature, should you be voting?
MeatHeadinCA on October 7, 2012 at 8:31 PM
GOP absentee/early voting is almost twice as much as it was at this point in 2008 in North Carolina. That was in an article was on the headline page Saturday. I also read that GOP early/absentee voting is up in Ohio as well. The Dooms are scared bleepless. And GOP online voter registration doubled shortly into the debate Wed nite and was still going strong on Thursday. So there are signs out there that the GOP is mobilized. GOOD! Keep it going all the way to victory!!
stukinIL4now on October 7, 2012 at 8:56 PM
When you enfranchise people living at government expense, you disenfranchise taxpayers.
Representation without taxation is EXACTLY as unfair as taxation without representation.
logis on October 7, 2012 at 9:03 PM
i can hear the chants selected not elected once again
cmsinaz on October 7, 2012 at 9:43 PM