How politics nuked Iran’s economy
Iran is facing a threat even more severe than the Stuxnet computer virus, a sophisticated line of code which was reportedly sponsored by the U.S. and Israel, and which destroyed some of Iran’s uranium centrifuges in 2010. In Persian, this affliction is called Siyasat Bazee – in English, playing politics…
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has played politics too, perhaps more so than anybody else. Part of the strength of his leadership is based on keeping different political factions divided, so that they don’t become strong enough to challenge him. This has encouraged intense infighting, where each faction tries to outmaneuver the other with Siyasat Bazee instead of working together collectively to tackle Iran’s problems.
In fact, it is Khamenei’s politicization of the nuclear program which has hurt his regime the most. He does not permit deviation from, or open debate about, the official line on the direction of the program. Khamenei has taken what is essentially a nationalistic project that enjoyed widespread consensus and turned it into a divisive issue. Khamenei’s Siyasat Bazee with the nuclear program has weakened the regime and crippled its performance in the face of economic challenges.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I hope that this will lead to a coup someday. Iran needs one.
Bitter Clinger on October 5, 2012 at 5:04 PM
Does this just make them more dangerous if they are on the verge of collapse?
Rixon on October 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM
…they’re a terrorist state run by fanatical followers of the bloodiest religion on the planet, making some level of attempt at actually making WMD’s. May I ask just how you think they could GET any more dangerous?
MelonCollie on October 5, 2012 at 5:16 PM
I meant to write “DOESN’T” this make them more dangerous, etc. which would be a rhetorical statement than a question.
Rixon on October 5, 2012 at 5:25 PM
Bernanke running their bank too?
BKeyser on October 5, 2012 at 5:59 PM
Or perhaps it was a communist style economic policy that nuked their economy? But I’m just spit balling some crazy here. Never mind, I’m sure their economy is imploding because of political infighting. That’s why I don’t get paid the big bucks for my political views. I think crazy stuff like communist economy theory killing an economy.
NotCoach on October 5, 2012 at 6:06 PM