Protests in Tehran: Will the pain of sanctions change Iran’s nuke calculus?
Advocates of that line of thinking may have seen Wednesday’s protests as vindication — but it may not be that simple. While President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad eagerly concurs that it is Western sanctions that are behind the economic chaos in Iran, his political opponents — loyalists of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatullah Ali Khamenei — actually blame Ahmadinejad’s mismanagement of the economy for the precipitous currency collapse. That sentiment appears to have been shared by many on the streets in the series of small demonstrations around Tehran on Wednesday: Most of the protesters’ rage appears to have been directed at Ahmadinejad, who was accused of failing to take measures necessary to protect Iranian living standards. After all, the Iranian economy isn’t exactly on the verge of collapse, and the regime is believed to have a foreign currency reserve of some $100 billion. Indeed, the fact that it is still sending billions in aid to prop up the Syrian regime of President Bashar al-Assad — another sore point with protesters on Wednesday — underscores the fact that is not exactly bankrupt, yet.
So, even if sanctions are fueling the economic pain that is prompting Iranians to return to streets in protest, the expectation that such demonstrations will prompt Iran’s leaders to surrender a nuclear program that has been among their long-term priorities requires a considerable leap of faith. ”It would be optimistic at best to hope that the deteriorating economic circumstances will spur Iran’s leaders to shift their nuclear stance,” said Patrick Clawson of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy last month. “They do not seem to know or care much about the country’s economic situation — their own income has been hurt only a little, if at all, and they appear unconcerned about the prospect of popular unrest given their past success at repressing opposition. For now, they are likely to stay the course on both domestic economic policy and the nuclear issue.”…
The fact that the protesters are targeting Ahmadinejad may actually suit the regime in Tehran, which is effectively headed by Ayatullah Ali Khamenei.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
No, they are on a divine mission – or something!
OldEnglish on October 4, 2012 at 9:02 PM
Why would it?
A nuke is a “get out of sanctions free” card.
Count to 10 on October 4, 2012 at 9:07 PM
More like a “get out of invasions free” card.
If they try to use it to get out of sanctions, other nations will point out that if they start a nuclear war, there won’t be anything left of their nation to worry about sanctions.
It would be far more valuable as a “keep off” sign.
MelonCollie on October 4, 2012 at 9:15 PM
I have no doubt, the mullahs would let 90% of their people die, before they’d give up nuclear weapons.
Rebar on October 4, 2012 at 9:16 PM
They aren’t rational actors. Mutually assured destruction worked with the Soviets because Godless commies value their lives. The theocratic loons ruling Iran don’t. The ultimate goal for them is ushering in the end times. They couldn’t care less if they die, as long as they take a bunch of infidels with them.
Walter Sobchak on October 4, 2012 at 9:34 PM
What nuclear weapons?
antifederalist on October 4, 2012 at 10:20 PM
How do you know all of this? Do you have any facts to support your case?
antifederalist on October 4, 2012 at 10:21 PM
Head. Sand. Extract.
OldEnglish on October 4, 2012 at 10:28 PM
No. Sanctions aren’t doing this anyway. Geez, what a shallow conclusion. Perfect for the drive-by media. There is no reason sanctions have to destroy the currency for the purposes of the people’s domestic purchase.
Maybe it’s the JOOOOOOO-OOOOOOOZ.
J.E. Dyer on October 4, 2012 at 10:32 PM
Can’t come up with an intelligent reply can you?
antifederalist on October 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM
Err…
The ones they’ve admitted to trying to build:
Unless you think the Iranians are lying?
Rebar on October 5, 2012 at 12:17 AM
Apparently, you just read the headline and saw something that you liked. If you read just a little further you would have noticed:
It sounds to me like our overlords are making up more lies to get us into war again. Didn’t you guys fall for these lies during the run up to the Iraq war? Why do you all not question what you are being told?
antifederalist on October 5, 2012 at 7:39 AM