The painful truth about affirmative action
The mismatch effect happens when a school extends to a student such a large admissions preference — sometimes because of a student’s athletic prowess or legacy connection to the school, but usually because of the student’s race — that the student finds himself in a class where he has weaker academic preparation than nearly all of his classmates. The student who would flourish at, say, Wake Forest or the University of Richmond, instead finds himself at Duke, where the professors are not teaching at a pace designed for him — they are teaching to the “middle” of the class, introducing terms and concepts at a speed that is unnerving even to the best-prepared student. …
Research on the mismatch problem was almost non-existent until the mid-1990s; it has developed rapidly in the past half-dozen years, especially among labor economists. To cite just a few examples of the findings:
-Black college freshmen are more likely to aspire to science or engineering careers than are white freshmen, but mismatch causes blacks to abandon these fields at twice the rate of whites.
-Blacks who start college interested in pursuing a doctorate and an academic career are twice as likely to be derailed from this path if they attend a school where they are mismatched.
-About half of black college students rank in the bottom 20 percent of their classes (and the bottom 10 percent in law school).
-Black law school graduates are four times as likely to fail bar exams as are whites; mismatch explains half of this gap.
-Interracial friendships are more likely to form among students with relatively similar levels of academic preparation; thus, blacks and Hispanics are more socially integrated on campuses where they are less academically mismatched.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I don’t even have to read the article to know it’s racist
Ditkaca on October 3, 2012 at 10:34 AM
This is new? Those of us who are economists have been aware of this problem for some time.
makattak on October 3, 2012 at 10:35 AM
Gee. Who would have ever guessed this? /s
MikeA on October 3, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Not like this was not imagined before they started acting. Just like most consequences to Social Security were expected, but ignored because the consequences were actually the end result those who promoted it wanted.
Here too, the consequences are what were intended to happen. It gives credibility to the argument they are keeping your down! See, you got into college and then they refused to educate you.
astonerii on October 3, 2012 at 10:38 AM
Thomas Sowell wrote about this stuff in the 1970s.
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on October 3, 2012 at 10:40 AM
So now, unless the elite schools dumb down their education process, the social engineering crowds have a another reason to blow the whistle.
Of course the best solution is to make sure the school they attend is a “best fit” for them, but we know that will not happen.
Jabberwock on October 3, 2012 at 10:43 AM
Wait, you mean being unqualified is pretext for failure? I’m stunned.
If only there was a high profile example of this, somebody way up there in national politics we could point to as an example.
Anyone?
FineasFinn on October 3, 2012 at 10:47 AM
It also strongly reinforces the most toxic racist stereotypes. If, thanks to bad admissions policy, the dumbest kids in your class are always black…after four years of it, what are you going to think?
S. Weasel on October 3, 2012 at 10:48 AM
Barry the flim-flam con.
bayview on October 3, 2012 at 10:51 AM
If you can’t bring everyone up, the solution is to bring everyone else down to their level. That’s what they’ve been doing for years.
Dack Thrombosis on October 3, 2012 at 10:53 AM
I have worked with many people over the years who are black. If I did not meet them in person, I would have never known. They are smart and very dedicated to doing hard work, doing it well, and being very professional about it. I am sure there are plenty of the same examples in every hard science type class in universities to offset that image. I would hope so. The problem is that those at the bottom who fail become bitter and angry and have their biases reaffirmed. Those who got in on their own merit work extra hard to prove they earned it.
astonerii on October 3, 2012 at 10:56 AM
That’s only part of this depressing mess. The rest of the story: these young black students who drop out of science or engineering have to go someplace — it would be politically embarrassing just to boot them out of an elite institution altogether. This has led to the proliferation of fields such as black studies, specifically designed as a face-saving graceful exit for these students.
jwolf on October 3, 2012 at 10:58 AM
This is the first thing I thought of too. Sowell has been writing about this for decades!
Wake up, Lefties! Jeez.
visions on October 3, 2012 at 10:59 AM
Livefreeordie are you going to stand by and let the downtrodden be dissed like this? When are you going to quit that cushy college job and enter the real education fray to help the low socio-economic students get the education they need to compete?
chemman on October 3, 2012 at 11:03 AM
That’s just my point, astonerii. If everyone has the same admissions criteria, then kids of all colors perform similarly. Because — duh — they’re all equally qualified to be in that class.
When you lower the standards for one group, it’s inevitable that the worst-performing kids will be from that group.
S. Weasel on October 3, 2012 at 11:04 AM
So you mean that if an African American woman had a brother who attended, let’s say Princeton, to play basketball, and that was a big factor in her being accepted as a legacy minority student, she may be driven to pen an angry racialist dissertation lashing out at the institution that accepted her?
Ben Hur on October 3, 2012 at 11:07 AM
At one time we were told that the definition of affirmative action was: all else equal, you choose the minority over the white male.
Because that didn’t produce the desired results, it has morphed into something far more perverse. It is now a two-track system, from admission through grading through to graduation. Black students are measured only against other black students to determine admission.
Black students are graded differently, because if the graduation rates between whites and blacks differed greatly as you would expect from the severely tilted admission SATs, all holy hell would break loose.
Subsequently, those that grade students found they could not honestly support a secret dual-grading system, and so lowered grading standards to the lowest common denominator. Result, -a college degree doesn’t mean as much as it used to, no matter your race. Employers now have to measure applicants by some other means, or just roll the dice.
slickwillie2001 on October 3, 2012 at 11:08 AM
The important thing is that people feel better about themselves. At least until they flunk out of college and go on to lead unnecessarily stunted lives.
JeremiahJohnson on October 3, 2012 at 11:11 AM
This applies to whites, too. In England, attempts to lump Grammar School and Public (Private) School kids in with Secondary Modern kids, ended up with a lowering of standards overall.
Enter the “Red Brick Universities”.
OldEnglish on October 3, 2012 at 11:20 AM
Anyone having worked with an obvious quota hires throughout their career knows this to be true.
In gummint they usually get stuck in middle management or the “training” department where they can blame incoming trainees for their perpetual f-ups. In academia they get put in some sugarcoated, vastly overpaid makework position like Charles Ogletree, Cornel West, Anita Hill and Moochelle Obama. In medicine you get Jocelyn Elders who can’t tell a spleen from a pancreas. In the private sector the typical approach is for the employer to wager the cost of keeping on incompetent quota hires versus the cost of frivolous lawsuits and the usual Al $harpton “community” rants for firing them.
viking01 on October 3, 2012 at 11:21 AM
I can attest to this from direct experience. As a graduate TA I was visited more than once by the department chair to make sure I was following just such an “unofficial” policy regarding a “separate” grading system. He was terrified of losing department funding if we didn’t play the dean’s game of propping up the students who “needed” it. The dean, it is my belief, was himself terrified of bias lawsuits if certain students didn’t pass, this despite the fact that I had many students of all races who didn’t do the work to earn a passing grade.
Difficultas_Est_Imperium on October 3, 2012 at 11:25 AM
And the problem manifests itself in graduate school. My wife, a minority, is on the faculty of a university. She has a minority grad student who graduated with good grades from an Ivy League school and cannot write. She doesn’t understand how that can happen.
Last year, they had to tell a student she couldn’t complete her doctorate even thought the school had moved her along due to her minority status. Now she has the debt from a masters program she never should have entered in the first place.
Still, the university is falling all over itself to get minorities into its graduate programs to satisfy the requirement of this or that accrediting agency, task force, or bureaucracy.
AcidReflux on October 3, 2012 at 11:33 AM
Well played, sir, well played.
cptacek on October 3, 2012 at 11:48 AM
All you ever have to do is ask why outcomes matter on a racial basis except when it comes to athletics.
TexasDan on October 3, 2012 at 11:57 AM
This is a pretty bad argument simply because everyone knows that graduating in the middle part of your class in a lower tier school is far less valuable than graduating at the bottom of your class in a big-name school.
Everyone wants to go to the best school that will take them, and I have never heard from anyone who wished they had gone to a lower-ranked school because their school was “too hard” and they couldn’t keep up.
I don’t think the authors have proven their case. Most people who see blacks underperforming in college will simply think that those same blacks underperformed before college as well (which is why affirmative action was needed) so those blacks would underperform in any college, no matter where they went. It is not true to say a C student at harvard is automatically an A student at a state school. It just doesn’t work like that. A lot of people do poorly in college because they dont work hard, not because they are mentally incapable.
kaltes on October 3, 2012 at 11:57 AM
My brother in law worked with a drug research company where he was part of the group which was tasked with hiring a group of lab assistants. One of those was valedictorian in chemistry from a well known “black” university. Her grades were excellent, good reviews, recommendations from professors etc.
Her first day on the job she didn’t understand what basic laboratory procedure is. They tried to counsel her. The gave her checklists on how to do the simplest of tasks. They even got one of the other assistants to try to help her grasp the easiest things but without success. After a month or so of valiant effort to help the “chemistry major” valedictorian of well known “black” university they had little choice but to fire her. Miss Valedictorian was a burden even to the high school level lab helpers whom had rapidly outpaced her.
viking01 on October 3, 2012 at 11:59 AM
Re: The painfull truth about affirmative action.
See the Hot Air thread on
“Obama wanted to have a Federal Court trial in the U.S. for Ben Loud One if he was captured alive.”
APACHEWHOKNOWS on October 3, 2012 at 12:06 PM
Note that when California universities were forced to scrap affirmative action admissions, minority graduation rates a few years later skyrocketed.
Sekhmet on October 3, 2012 at 1:03 PM