The debates: Image is everything
Through the art of video production, one candidate can be portrayed more favorably than the other. On October 7, 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain met for the second of three presidential debates. The format was a town hall debate. Both men roamed the floor and locked eyes with the audience members who asked questions. Numerous cameras were placed around the room to capture the candidates regardless of where they stood.
While equal time was given to each man for questions, the audience, when viewing the televised debate, experienced subtle differences in the camera angles for each candidate. Typically, when Obama spoke, the camera displayed a close up, eye-level image, filling the frame with his upper chest and face. This presented to the viewer a strong image of Obama. In contrast, when McCain spoke, the camera often showed a waist-up, medium shot, filling the frame with as much background as McCain himself. These shots made McCain appear small, which was exaggerated from time to time by camera angles that looked down on him. In addition, because of the wide shots of McCain, Obama had more face time on camera, as he was often shown in the background when McCain answered a question.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Dr. Goebbels would approve.
Just like this classic “Star Trek” episode…
Del Dolemonte on October 3, 2012 at 3:13 PM
Cheaters be cheatin’, yo!
nitzsche on October 3, 2012 at 3:14 PM
Well I know what image I will have in my mind the entire debate about bho. The evil, anti-American, worse president our Republic has EVER had! That is MY image!
L
letget on October 3, 2012 at 3:16 PM
This image was not helpful
(This really happened – thanks RINOs)
faraway on October 3, 2012 at 3:17 PM
OMG, that looks like my cat about to throw up a hair ball!
L
letget on October 3, 2012 at 3:19 PM
They do it with photos and they do it with metaphors, right now, time magazine has an irrelevant headline “Mitt Meltdown” which means nothing, but they would never put Obama Meltdown, and that is what we have seen in his foreign policy this past week, with the attack on the embassy and the foolish articulating of Mrs. Clinton, that we in the united states have free dum of speech and can make very bad bad videos which the guv er mint is not re sponsible for. That’s a foreign policy Meltdown.
Fleuries on October 3, 2012 at 3:21 PM
funny how that works
gatorboy on October 3, 2012 at 3:21 PM
mitt meltdown goes well with mittens milquetoast (ick and yuck!)
Pragmatic on October 3, 2012 at 3:29 PM
Obama is a SCOAMF. It shouldn’t be too hard for Mitt to get under Obama’s thin skin and have him babbling random Marxist jibberish.
bitsy on October 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM
Word.
Rational Thought on October 3, 2012 at 3:44 PM