Check the math: Romney’s tax plan doesn’t raise middle-class taxes
TPC claims that Romney cannot cut tax rates by 20 percent across the board and maintain revenue neutrality without raising the net tax burden on the middle class. According to TPC, in the year 2015 under Romney’s tax plan, “maintaining revenue neutrality mathematically necessitates a shift in the tax burden of at least $86 billion away from high-income taxpayers onto lower- and middle-income taxpayers. This is true even under the assumption that the maximum amount of revenue possible is obtained from cutting tax expenditures for high-income households.”
So, according to the Tax Policy Center, we start out with an $86 billion hole in Romney’s tax plan. But the Tax Policy Center’s own calculations show that that $86 billion hole can, in fact, be filled without raising middle class taxes.
TPC’s study assumes that pro-growth tax reform cannot produce any economic growth. TPC acknowledges that, according to an economic model created by Harvard professors Greg Mankiw and Matthew Weinzerl that assumes tax reform will produce economic growth, “the tax cuts would result in revenue reductions of $307 billion (instead of $360 billion).” In other words, economic growth could fill $53 billion of that $86 billion hole.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
“Only Jonathon Chait can do math.”
/Sesquatchilian
Bitter Clinger on October 3, 2012 at 1:40 PM
Sure not gonna get any information like this from bho/team/bhopress!
Mitt and Ryan HAS got to somehow get their tax plan out. Do it so most people can understand it from now till election!
L
letget on October 3, 2012 at 1:44 PM
Well of course, this is the Democratic mantra. They never think growth or revenue results from tax cuts. They have to hang onto this second grade belief so they can justify tax increases. What they call fairness trumps actual tax revenue. Obama admitted this in one of the debates with Hillary. Democrats really aren’t interested in tax revenue. What they want is redistribution (aka fairness).
rhombus on October 3, 2012 at 1:44 PM
Mitt has got to do something other than, “Hey, I’m better than Obama, kinda sorta.”
MeatHeadinCA on October 3, 2012 at 1:45 PM
Look, regardless of how you play with the math, does anyone really think Romney has some sinister plan to raise taxes on anybody? I realize the Democrats are trying to make the argument that he’ll cut taxes for the rich and “pay for it” with a tax increase on the middle class, but seriously- is there anyone who believes this?
BKeyser on October 3, 2012 at 1:47 PM
IOW Liberal organization again caught making up stuff to support there lies.
Skwor on October 3, 2012 at 1:48 PM
National Review has also hammered on this today:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/329133/obama-s-middle-class-tax-hike-editors
gwelf on October 3, 2012 at 1:48 PM
their
Skwor on October 3, 2012 at 1:48 PM
So what, Rombo will still give everyone cancer.
Bishop on October 3, 2012 at 1:51 PM
Whoever said that it SHOULD be revenue-neutral? Even the Bush-era tax rates were, just before the DemPression, producing a higher-than-historical-average tax take as a percentage of GDP, and will once again as soon as the DemPression is over.
Steve Eggleston on October 3, 2012 at 1:54 PM
The proggies will never acknowledge that tax cuts can cause revenue to increase. They will die on that hill, with their blindfolds on.
slickwillie2001 on October 3, 2012 at 2:03 PM
We all know Olecturer is no math brain and that the slimestreamers would never question any Obamaganda spewing from the campaign.
stukinIL4now on October 3, 2012 at 2:09 PM
Whether he pulls out a white-board or a quick multi-media (60 secs) presentation, Mitt has to do something simple that will allow an “Ah-ha, I get it” moment. The low info voter can’t keep up with the rhetoric in 90 sec soundbites–bring them a picture like this that shows the party in majority control since ’07 and the deficit under their control.
hillsoftx on October 3, 2012 at 2:39 PM
Check the math? Man, you know math is RACIST!
CycloneCDB on October 3, 2012 at 2:43 PM
That was a funny thread. sesqui first accused us of shooting the messenger, but by the time about 30 minutes had passed was doing the exact same thing.
who looks pathetic now?
sesquipedalian on August 31, 2011 at 5:42 PM
Del Dolemonte on October 3, 2012 at 2:48 PM
rogerb on October 3, 2012 at 2:57 PM
I’ve been out of pocket. What did I miss?
rogerb on October 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM
Check this thread starting at 10:53 am:
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/03/woodward-obama-planning-to-cut-250-billion-from-medicare-over-10-years/
Bitter Clinger on October 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM
Ha. Thanks. I’ll have to remember the “magic” bit.
rogerb on October 3, 2012 at 3:39 PM
slickwillie2001 on October 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM