The atheist lobby
The nation’s atheists went to Capitol Hill on Monday to launch an effort that they hope will someday give them the lobbying clout of the Christian conservative movement. …
Rogers, in a glittery gold blouse and knee-high boots with four-inch heels, acknowledges that she has a bit of a challenge to match the $390 million she says religious groups spend on lobbying each year. But she says the group maintained its atheistic presence at both political conventions, will have chapters in all 50 states by the end of the year, and, with its first congressional briefing Monday, is stepping up its lobbying.
In theory, nonbelievers could be a potent political force. As the secularists pointed out, about a fifth of Americans don’t state a religious identity when asked, and a majority of Americans think politicians should keep their faith out of their public-policy decisions. …
But in practice, atheists aren’t about to become a force capable of breaching the “fence of piety” that makes religious expression a virtue for American politicians. This is because the very notion of uniting nonbelievers behind a common cause is pretty much an oxymoron. Those who identify themselves as atheists and agnostics tend not to be the type to join affinity groups. That’s why there isn’t an International Brotherhood of Individualists.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Pretty much.
Also, not subscribing to any religion doesn’t mean you have anything philosophically in common with others who also do not subscribe.
I was raised on most of the morality people would ascribe to religion, just without the mythology attached, while other atheists have renounced their original religion because they were unwilling to be constrained by that very morality. As such, we would have little in common other than free Sundays.
Count to 10 on October 2, 2012 at 9:30 PM
They’ll never have it. Christian conservative lobbyists are lobbying on behalf of things they believe in, while I can only imagine that Atheists are lobbying for the right to not have to listen to what other people believe in.
For a bunch of people who claim to be “above” religion, they sure do bawl like toddlers when they’re accidentally exposed to religious iconography in public.
mintycrys on October 2, 2012 at 9:34 PM
Not original: only adopted in the 1950s. The original (if unofficial) motto is E Pluribus Unum.
Do it if you like, but entirely inappropriate activity for government.
Again, not original: slipped in in the ’50s, to spoil both the rhythm and the sense of “one nation indivisible”.
Tzetzes on October 2, 2012 at 10:39 PM
Should we also get rid of the Star Spangled Banner? After all, it was only made the national anthem in 1931.
malclave on October 2, 2012 at 11:40 PM
Tzetzes on October 2, 2012 at 10:39 PM
LOL- You want to go back to “original” because there certainly was a lot more religion in government during the “original” period. States had “state” religions.. Ugh funny how history is wonderful when it is in YOUR side..
melle1228 on October 3, 2012 at 12:06 AM
Atheists, living off the table scraps of the religions they love to kick and punch on a minutely basis.
astonerii on October 3, 2012 at 6:47 AM