Canadians are more conservative than Americans now
Despite our cherished liberal Canadian values, our behaviour in family matters is a good deal more conservative than that of Americans. Our marriage rates are higher and our divorce rates are lower. Twenty-seven per cent of American children live in single-parent families. And the number of children born to unmarried mothers – especially to women in their 20s – is soaring. In 2010, 40.8 per cent of births in the U.S. were to unmarried women. That rate is growing fastest among the white lower-middle class – the very people who tend to vote Republican and loudly thump the tub for traditional family values.
Children born to single mothers do worse by every measure, so that’s the most important family number to keep your eye on. In Canada, the unmarried birth rate is holding steady at 27.2 per cent.
New Canadians – who are far more conservative than old Canadians – are reinforcing these old-fashioned family patterns. Their family ties tend to be extremely strong. Among the biggest immigrant groups – Chinese and South Asians – divorce rates are lower and unmarried motherhood is virtually unknown. In the U.S., by contrast, the biggest immigrant group is Hispanic, in which unmarried mothers are the norm.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Dave Drywall hardest hit.
BigWyo on September 20, 2012 at 8:34 PM
Just wait until those Chinese and South Asians hit the second generation having assimilated the liberal Canadian values that surround them.
Bend It Like Beckham isn’t just a movie about soccer.
Vatican Watcher on September 20, 2012 at 8:35 PM
When in my twenties, I loved Canada and the Canadians I knew. Then when they went lib, I disengaged. Now what a pleasure it is to identify again with them, and think what a fine place to live.
petefrt on September 20, 2012 at 8:38 PM
And Canada didn’t make home ownership an entitlement with ridiculous loans to people with little to no down payments, crappy credit and poor job histories. How sad we in the Us have f’d ourselves in so many ways.
toliver on September 20, 2012 at 8:38 PM
Canada’s economy is so intertwined with ours that when we crash, they will too, liberal or conservative.
Waggoner on September 20, 2012 at 8:41 PM
Now if PM Harper would just bring back the death penalty , it would be a capitalist utopia. Still tho he is the closest we have had to a Reagan in my recent memory..
cableguy615 on September 20, 2012 at 8:42 PM
We have better bacon.
davidk on September 20, 2012 at 8:45 PM
We’re to the left of Canada now? That freaks me oot a little bit, eh?
Benedict Nelson on September 20, 2012 at 8:48 PM
Tell that to Ezra Levant.
CurtZHP on September 20, 2012 at 8:51 PM
Actually, Ezra might agree with the general thesis that we’re more conservative, if only because our tax rates are lower and as stated above, we didn’t give mortgages to welfare bums, etc.
Thanks to him, in fact, Canadian conservatives — who have always existed — are now more vocal because he’s inspired them to be.
But anyhow, here is Levant’s 4th of July love letter to the US:
http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/video/search/america/source/the-source/ezras-love-letter-to-america/1721117549001
ConservativeTalkRadio on September 20, 2012 at 8:56 PM
Say again, white lower middle class unwed mothers vote Republican??? What planet do Canadians live on?
Overall,however, saying that Canada is more conservative than the US is hardly a revelation. Water is wet, sun rises in the East, Amerika has gone NAZI social-democrat. So, yes Canada looks more conservative.
2ndMAW68 on September 20, 2012 at 9:04 PM
The author is an illogical imbecile. She hasn’t provided any evidence that even one of these girls is from a Republican family, yet she makes the indictment that most of them are. If the families of this population group are 75% Republican and 25% Democrat, every case could logically, in theory, come from the 25%, and I’m sure the vast majority are raised Democrat.
Buddahpundit on September 20, 2012 at 9:09 PM
CA has fewer blacks and Hispanics. Deal with it.
Charlemagne on September 20, 2012 at 9:09 PM
Wait, you mean gay marriage doesn’t destroy traditional family?
lester on September 20, 2012 at 9:25 PM
Does this mean you’re gay?
Lanceman on September 20, 2012 at 9:27 PM
Sorry, but political/philosophical conservatism is not the same as “living” conservative. I hate how often the two are conflated.
jjraines on September 20, 2012 at 9:28 PM
I am a Canuck and I live in Alberta which is the most conservative province in the land …and not surprising, the most successful…and that is with even the Red Tories in power…equivelant to your RINOS…..
The East though is a whole other question….horribly left and backwards…..Toronto area and Quebec….of course if we get lucky, Quebec will seperate….
Albertanator on September 20, 2012 at 9:29 PM
I’m highly skeptical of this as a long term proposition, but it’s encouraging to think there might be somewhere to run.
HitNRun on September 20, 2012 at 9:31 PM
and?
Sachiko on September 20, 2012 at 9:34 PM
I know several white lower middle class single mothers. All of them vote Republican.
CoffeeMan on September 20, 2012 at 9:35 PM
We have immigrated ourselves out of capitalism.
Ted Torgerson on September 20, 2012 at 9:36 PM
Lousy Kaybeckers.
Lanceman on September 20, 2012 at 9:37 PM
Gay marriage not destroying traditional family means I’m gay? No. You comment however is another example of your deficient reasoning capability.
lester on September 20, 2012 at 9:39 PM
*Your
lester on September 20, 2012 at 9:41 PM
No, I asked the question because it would explain much.
Lanceman on September 20, 2012 at 9:42 PM
Doesn’t explain anything.
One doesn’t have to be part of a group to defend their equal rights. I’m also not black, so by your standards of “explanation” should I not care about legality of interracial marriage?!
lester on September 20, 2012 at 10:00 PM
Don’t equate the two, douchebag. If I were black, I’d be offended some little punk like you was elevating homosexuality to being black.
Lanceman on September 20, 2012 at 10:02 PM
Well then,that explains me,I thought for awhile, me was paraniod!
(snark).
canopfor on September 20, 2012 at 10:22 PM
Just take a look at the premise. The article claims to compare “conservatism” on the basis of what?
Thereby attempting to define conservatism as a whole on the basis of a few planks.
la la la FAIL.
RushBaby on September 20, 2012 at 10:28 PM
Not really conservative, more status quo. Leave everything right where it is now and do not move any level of power right or left. That is what conservative is. Not slide to the right the same way someone will push it to the left. Let the natural change in demographics and time move where the people want it. People will move it to where they are more comfortable and then leave it there.
If someone on the street in any town Canada are asked what has Ottawa done that has affected your life, they will not be sure they did anything. Can not say the same thing about Washington. In the end Washington has affected any town Canada more than Ottawa has.
tjexcite on September 20, 2012 at 11:05 PM
No, he’s a Moe-lester.
andycanuck on September 20, 2012 at 11:22 PM