Obama considering announcing new red lines for Iranian nuclear program
The administration is also racing to complete, in the next several months, a new radar system in Qatar that would combine with radars already in place in Israel and Turkey to form a broad arc of antimissile coverage, according to military officials. The message to Iran would be that even if it developed a nuclear weapon and mounted it atop its growing fleet of missiles, it could be countered by antimissile systems.
The question of how explicit Mr. Obama’s warnings to Iran should be is still a subject of internal debate, closely tied to election-year politics. Some of Mr. Obama’s advisers have argued that Israel needs a stronger public assurance that he is willing to take military action, well before Iran actually acquired a weapon. But other senior officials have argued that Israel is trying to corner Mr. Obama into a military commitment that he does not yet need to make…
None of the steps being taken by the Obama administration addresses the most immediate goal of the United States and its allies: Slowing Iran’s nuclear development. So inside the American and Israeli intelligence agencies, there is continuing debate about possible successors to “Olympic Games,” the covert cyberoperation, begun in the Bush administration and accelerated under Mr. Obama, that infected Iran’s nuclear centrifuges and, for a while, sent them spinning out of control. An error in the computer code alerted Iran to the attack in 2010, and since then many of the country’s nuclear sites have been modified to defend against such attacks, according to experts familiar with the effort.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
The only red line for an American president should be an imminent attack on America. We can’t afford another war and pretending to have Israel’s back is only damaging both nation’s national interest.
abobo on September 3, 2012 at 1:04 PM
Mr. President, what are you doing to give those red lines some credibility?
No, I won’t shut up.
No, it’s not possible for me to do that to myself.
NeighborhoodCatLady on September 3, 2012 at 1:07 PM
Red lines?
Yeah right… lemme read the fine print before I buy this line of bull.
CPT. Charles on September 3, 2012 at 1:08 PM
No, they’ll just continue to be the subject of ridicule….
apostic on September 3, 2012 at 1:12 PM
Makes much more sense to have a nuke armed Iran, just like it does for North Korea and Pakistan. Perhaps we can pay tribute to Iran in the form of free food or foreign aid. Let Israel be vaporized so all other countries will understand we always stand by our allies, except when it isn’t convenient.
a capella on September 3, 2012 at 1:13 PM
bho lies so much, if he was ever to tell the truth about something, no one would believe him? I do not trust bho one bit when it comes to Israel, period! Or for that matter on anything from the forked tongue snake!
L
letget on September 3, 2012 at 1:14 PM
One nuclear bomb will ruin your day, unless of course you trust the Mullahs to be rational.
rob verdi on September 3, 2012 at 1:15 PM
You would think people could see the writing on the wall this guy.
Romney/Ryan/GOP press an issue, making him finally do something, just so he can remove it from the debate…
…and then a few months later, it doesn’t come about as Barry originally claimed, and he either ignores it or blames someone else.
Same crap, different subject.
budfox on September 3, 2012 at 1:15 PM
Focused like a laser,…for a couple of news cycles.
a capella on September 3, 2012 at 1:20 PM
Didn’t Hillary originally set a red line of September 2009, by which Iran was supposed to comply with all international edicts and inspections?
Then Iran kept moving the goalposts, saying it was “studying” whatever the West said. Every new deadline had to be “studied” for months before it was rejected. While the nuclear program went on and on.
Lucy, Charlie Brown, football.
Wethal on September 3, 2012 at 1:25 PM
So, the “CIC” Commie In Chief draws red lines, no that he has any red history or something.
Take a chair, sit on it CIC Chicago thug.
APACHEWHOKNOWS on September 3, 2012 at 1:26 PM
Sand Obama prays that there will be no rain upon his new line.
bayview on September 3, 2012 at 1:26 PM
If you cross our red lines, we’ll put up more red lines for you to cross…
catmman on September 3, 2012 at 1:29 PM
If Hillary is in Tel Aviv when it is destroyed, just close your eyes and think of the ships, high schools and parks that will be named after her. Posthumous Nobel Peace Prize and her face goes on the new $1 billion dollar bill awaiting hyperinflation.
spiritof61 on September 3, 2012 at 1:31 PM
Are the “new red lines” going to be even more stern warnings by Hillary? She needs to do them either in her screaming voice or “Ahm so tard of this shit, act right Iran” voice.
arnold ziffel on September 3, 2012 at 1:32 PM
Captain Kickass indeed. The very fact that you need to establish “new” red lines tells our enemies all that they need to know about you.
Valkyriepundit on September 3, 2012 at 1:33 PM
Btw, I don’t think high stakes bluffing is a big part of Jewish life. Diaspora Jews were in no position to make idle threats, and history’s worst murderer of Jews made good on his. Zionists take threats seriously; it would take a pretty paltry Zionist to give threats a bad name. Violent braggadocio, although not unknown among Jews, is characteristic of more theatrical cultures
Seth Halpern on September 3, 2012 at 1:44 PM
I assume that Iran breaches these new supposed “red lines”, we’ll see a new set issued. Perhaps one of them will be a mushroom cloud over New York.
jefrey with one f on September 3, 2012 at 1:46 PM
Isn’t “olympic games” yet another leak. I hadn’t seen that one yet.
gh on September 3, 2012 at 1:57 PM
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=olympic+games+iran+nuclear
Apparently not new (jun 1st is first hit). Just havn’t been reading the slimes enough.
gh on September 3, 2012 at 1:58 PM
Would those be the antimissile systems that President Choom is bargaining away to the Russians, or the missile defense systems that President Choom has outright cancelled?
RoadRunner on September 3, 2012 at 2:35 PM
Like so much else, beyond parody: “setting new red lines”. LOL
But most still miss the main point (from strictly the US viewpoint, not considering Israel’s obvious concerns): Iranian nukes will make Iran much much much harder to deter and punish for its terrorist war on the US and the west. A war that’s been under way for 30+ years.
Missile defenses won’t change that a bit.
Day One: Iranian-backed terrorists pull off a mass-casualty attack in the US, or Canada, or western Europe (or the Arab world).
Day Two: what do you do now?
Israel actually faces a similar problem. It’s the implicit retaliatory potential of Iranian nukes that’s their greatest threat – not a bolt-from-the-blue offensive and “unprovoked” attack.
IceCold on September 3, 2012 at 2:41 PM
Now he’s serious. The new demand is this: If they nuke more than four US Cities, he’s going to send Hillary.
Kenosha Kid on September 3, 2012 at 2:49 PM
So missile defense doesn’t work… unless a Democrat occupies the White House?
calbear on September 3, 2012 at 2:53 PM