Maybe voters don’t believe that politicians can fix America’s economy anymore
From this trip, and from looking at things over the last six months, I am beginning to get the feeling that voters are shrugging their shoulders about politicians, no longer believing they can fix the economic problems. They’ve reset their expectations about how political leaders can change the dynamic. After watching basically no growth in real wages over the last decade, no real growth in private sector jobs and a stagnant unemployment rate, they don’t think that a president (or a governor, for that matter) can do much to change the situation.
They also feel that politicians making typical promises about how they are going to fix things are not realistic or to be trusted. The public seems increasingly to want to be told the truth and what to really expect. They don’t want to be sold some happy story with slogans and talking points, but instead given a real sense of where we are and what our future looks like. It seems that voters want to be included in the conversation, and asked to be part of the solution. And they think the leadership solution is a much more local one in their communities and neighborhoods.
This “reset” on the country’s economic and leadership outlook of what might be a new normal could actually benefit Obama to a small degree. If Romney tries to make too many grand promises about what he will do as president, he could be viewed as untrustworthy and a typical politician.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Funny four years ago the Press hadn’t made this astounding discovery…what has changed, I wonder?
JFKY on July 6, 2012 at 1:53 PM
There is a very simple solution.
QUIT MUCKING AROUND WITH IT.
tom daschle concerned on July 6, 2012 at 1:56 PM
Well it is a lot easier to make thing worse.
tmitsss on July 6, 2012 at 1:56 PM
People giving up hope, kinda like in the Progressive Golden Age of the 1930′s. Thanks MSM!
forest on July 6, 2012 at 1:57 PM
April 2010
Vice President Biden predicted Friday at a Pennsylvania fundraiser that the U.S. economy would be adding up to 500,000 jobs each month “some time in the next couple of months.”
tmitsss on July 6, 2012 at 1:58 PM
Right, Maureen. Voters who think local government is more accountable and effective are naturally going to want the messiah of big-government, the guy who just engineered a massive federal power grab so that all our health care decisions can now be dictated by a bunch of bureaucrats in D.C.
I know a lot of people don’t bother to read what you write, Maureen, but I didn’t know you were one of those people!
AZCoyote on July 6, 2012 at 1:59 PM
I’ve never believed it. I believe that the best thing government and politicians can do for the economy is leave it alone and get the hell out of the way. Pretty much the same as for every thing else. That government is best which governs least…or something like that.
Oldnuke on July 6, 2012 at 2:00 PM
This is Romney’s biggest challenge. Even the people who are voting for him don’t really believe he can improve things, they just don’t like Obama.
libfreeordie on July 6, 2012 at 2:01 PM
Politicians can’t fix economic problems. They can only get in or out of the way of the citizens who can.
gwelf on July 6, 2012 at 2:02 PM
(Repaired conceptual blind spot in headline)
landlines on July 6, 2012 at 2:03 PM
Can you at least refrain from spewing anti-Maureen Dowd vitriol until she actually writes the column. Jeez.
libfreeordie on July 6, 2012 at 2:03 PM
I have never in my life thought that it was government’s job to fix or in any way manage the economy. Their only job with respect to the economy s to establish rules, within the bounds of the Constitution, make sure toe rules are followed, and to then get the HELL out of the way.
I reject the entire Leftist premise that the government as to have a dominant role in the economy.
Charlemagne on July 6, 2012 at 2:03 PM
Now you’re talkin’ crazy talk!
/
Nick_Angel on July 6, 2012 at 2:04 PM
Dear Maureen,
Politicians as a class are predominantly lawyers with little to no business experience or background in economics.
The further we can get them from the economy the better off we will all be.
Politicians are some of the least qualified people to be attempting to manage an economy.
Charlemagne on July 6, 2012 at 2:06 PM
Coyote probably just thought that Maureen finally got her surgery!
tims472 on July 6, 2012 at 2:06 PM
Maybe Mathew Dowd who use to be a dem and swith to the gop has now switched back to the dems.
bgibbs1000 on July 6, 2012 at 2:06 PM
Not true.
According to the latest CNN/ORC “poll”, more Americans think Romney would do a batter job handling the economy than O’bama. PEW found the same thing. So did al-AP. The only outlier was the Faux News poll.
Del Dolemonte on July 6, 2012 at 2:10 PM
Sure, politicians can fix the economy. They can do it the same way every successful politician has ever fixed the economy going back to Coolidge and including Kennedy, Reagan, and Clinton:
They can leave more money in the hands of the people by reducing taxes and regulations, get out of our way, and let us grow the economy ourselves.
Government can only operate by using a brake or by a shot of nitrous. We provide the basic fuel. Taxes are a brake. Deficit spending is a shot of nitrous. Nitrous is fine for a short 1/4 mile run, but once you turn it off, performance goes back to what it was and you risk blowing the thing up if you use too much.
Obama is in a position where he is applying BOTH nitrous AND the brakes at the same time.
To put it bluntly, he’s stupid.
crosspatch on July 6, 2012 at 2:10 PM
Only some ninny socialist looking for validation of their world view would actually buy into such an argument.
crosspatch on July 6, 2012 at 2:12 PM
And if you haven’t noticed, I am just about to the edge of my civility today with this socialist nincompoops today.
IT DOESN’T WORK. It never has. It never will. Get this idiot out of the White House.
crosspatch on July 6, 2012 at 2:13 PM
Your first clue should be that he is getting a paycheck from ABC.
Difficultas_Est_Imperium on July 6, 2012 at 2:15 PM
That is what democrats are banking on.
The Notorious G.O.P on July 6, 2012 at 2:18 PM
Strange. The last time I heard that line, Carter was president.
Physics Geek on July 6, 2012 at 2:21 PM
Strangely, the New York Times will tell you everything you need to know about Matthew Dowd.
Karl on July 6, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Oh Maureen, you can go back to your 112th reading of the
Vagina Monologues now…
ToddPA on July 6, 2012 at 2:33 PM
Wishcasting.
Caiwyn on July 6, 2012 at 2:39 PM
Their power to f— up the economy vastly exceeds their power to fix it. The best politicians can do is get the government out of the way as much as possible.
thirteen28 on July 6, 2012 at 2:39 PM
They know Obama can continue destroying things.
Which is funny, that you don’t seem to care that is OBama’s challenge: Do voters think he’ll continue destroying things?
lorien1973 on July 6, 2012 at 2:40 PM
If Romney tries to make too many grand promises about what he will do as president, he could be viewed as untrustworthy and a typical politician.
Finally the real reason for this piece, Matthew Dowd is trying to preemptively discredit any policies that Romney may put forth to fix Obama’s economy.
RJL on July 6, 2012 at 4:22 PM