That new Aaron Sorkin show about cable news isn’t very good
The series begins with McAvoy’s conversion from cynical hack to truth-telling idealist. We first meet him as part of a Northwestern University panel where he’s pilloried for his passionless impartiality. “You’re the Jay Leno of news anchors,” he’s told. “You’re popular because you don’t offend anyone.” Further goaded by his old-school, bourbon-soaked boss at the (fictional) ACN cable network, Charlie Skinner (Sam Waterston), and his new executive producer, MacKenzie McHale (Emily Mortimer)—with whom he has a messy romantic past—McAvoy experiences an epiphany. He goes on air and apologizes to the public for having pursued unimportant stories in pursuit of ratings. He will now only report on what is serious and real. He will dedicate himself to protecting civic virtue.
But that prompts the question: protect it from what? This is where Sorkin’s high-minded critique falls flat. McAvoy sanctimoniously laments the deterioration of public discourse and the news media’s complicity in it. But if that is the problem, his subsequent actions reveal a commitment to a uniformly partisan solution. McAvoy—and, by extension, Sorkin—preach political selflessness, but they practice pure partisanship; they extol the Fourth Estate’s democratic duty, but they believe that responsibility consists mostly of criticizing Republicans. This is done through the oldest trick in the book for a Hollywood liberal: by having McAvoy be a “sane Republican” who looks at his party with sadness and anger.
The fact, then, that the show begins in 2010—at the height of the Tea Party’s fervor—is no accident; it’s what enables the show’s didacticism. Sorkin’s intent is to show how events of recent memory could have been covered better by the media if journalists had only had the courage. Some of Sorkin’s lessons are well-taken. We see McAvoy under pressure from his bosses to confirm, or at least repeat, the false NPR report that Representative Gabrielle Giffords had been killed. Those scenes ring true, as do others in which ratings pressures are discussed.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Very interesting the sudden embarrassment from the liberal media on liberal media bias.
Could there be an election coming up they’re about to be punished with? Maybe some Golden Calf they enthusiastically propped up?
Marcus on June 22, 2012 at 9:20 AM
Someone cares about this? Who’s Aaron Sorkin? No, really. What network’s this show on?
“I know I know, let’s do a show that makes conservatives look bad,” -Aaron Sorkin.
“Ok. Where you going for lunch?” -Some Studio Exec.
Akzed on June 22, 2012 at 9:22 AM
I could be wrong here, but it looks like Laura Bennett wrote that article and here is the correct link.
BigGator5 on June 22, 2012 at 9:23 AM
Try this link: http://www.tnr.com/article/books-and-arts/magazine/104225/jake-tapper-the-snoozeroom-sorkin
radjah shelduck on June 22, 2012 at 9:26 AM
Is this the same goof who produced “The West Wing”, because that show sucked in ways that science can’t yet quantify.
Bishop on June 22, 2012 at 9:27 AM
Tapper you get that all wrong. A few weeks ago Sorkin told us that he has no political agenda!
Valkyriepundit on June 22, 2012 at 9:29 AM
It still amazes me that this guy created Sports Night, one of the all time best shows ever. I hope this fails miserably, though I doubt it will since it’s on pay cable.
Darksean on June 22, 2012 at 9:31 AM
Yes, radjah is correct about the broken link.
And the ANC is fictional? I thought the Anus News Channels have been around for a long, long time.
andycanuck on June 22, 2012 at 9:32 AM
This is an HBO show. You know the folks that gave us that Sarah Palin movie and Bill Maher. HBO carries lots and lots of water for BHO so that’s why this crap is on TV.
It sounds like the main character is Joe Scarborough, doesn’t it? The “sane Republican” embarassed by the “extreme” Tea Party types.*rolls eyes*
I hope it fails.
magicbeans on June 22, 2012 at 9:33 AM
I was just thinking yesterday. If someone had put a conservative version of the “West Wing” on the air and they had a scene in which a “Former female Speaker of the House, now minority leader” had a press conference and said the things that Pelosi said yesterday, they’d be laughed off the air for being “so over the top as to be ridiculous”.
WisRich on June 22, 2012 at 9:36 AM
One of the lines of dialogue from the McAvoy character is “Eliminating the minimum wage will create jobs. You know what else will? Slavery.”
My eyes got stuck in roll position.
Nick_Angel on June 22, 2012 at 9:37 AM
So basically, Sorkin’s come up with “Studio 60 on the Avenue of the Americas”?
jon1979 on June 22, 2012 at 9:39 AM
Sorkin likes slavery. That’s what communism is.
RBMN on June 22, 2012 at 9:41 AM
I’ve seen about half a dozen reviews of this show, and the descriptions “sanctimonious”, “liberal fantasy”, “didactic”, and “smug” keep popping up.
And that’s from critics who share Sorkin’s worldview and think he’s God’s gift to television writing.
JimLennon on June 22, 2012 at 9:45 AM
I’m going to have a hard time switching over from Spartacus to watch this show.
Bishop on June 22, 2012 at 9:52 AM
All that needs to be said about Sorkin and how he views Republicans is that he said his 3 favorite Republican columnists are David Frum, Mark McKinnon, and Andrew Sullivan.
Doughboy on June 22, 2012 at 9:53 AM
“We see McAvoy under pressure from his bosses to confirm, or at least repeat, the false NPR report that Representative Gabrielle Giffords had been killed.”
Ya think they’ll bring up “crosshairs”?
idesign on June 22, 2012 at 9:56 AM
I heard Jeff Daniels talking about the show. He said that Aaron Sorkin is a friend of and has worked with Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews and Larry O’Donnell. That should tell you about all you need to know.
Fallon on June 22, 2012 at 9:58 AM
Jeff Daniels is also a good friend of James Cameron.
Blake on June 22, 2012 at 10:01 AM
WHAT?? How could you NOT be ASTOUNDED and BREATHTAKEN by such a PIERCING Leftist bon mot that no doubt DEVASTATES your long-held right-wing delusions! Do you not RECOGNIZE the sheer AWESOMENESS of progressive snark that is being aimed at you? Sorkin/McAvoy is simply trying to “speak truth to stupid”, but alas, you may simply be too stupid to have truth spoken to you.
/sarc
JimLennon on June 22, 2012 at 10:02 AM
Will there be an episode on editing the news to give a false impression,e.g., Zimmerman 911 tapes, Romney speech? Or, how about all the photos they’ve photoshopped/edited over the years? Terrorists in the mideast have nothing over our own media terrorists in NYC/DC. How about an episode on their refusal to vet left wing presidential candidates? Or, trying to climb into conservative candidates wombs? How about the failure to cover why our agents and I don’t want to guess how many Mexican civilians have been killed by guns we gave to the cartels with the president’s stamp of approval?
Blake on June 22, 2012 at 10:07 AM
I have little to say in response other than to suggest that the sarc tag was probably unnecessary. haha.
Nick_Angel on June 22, 2012 at 10:11 AM
Typical liberal tactic: When you don’t like history you rewrite it.
gwelf on June 22, 2012 at 10:21 AM
From later in Tapper’s article:
Did you see it?
Look.
Closer.
There. Right there.
Between the plot lines and dialogue: “Faux news is eebil. EEBIL!”
In other news, HBO is still in business.
locomotivebreath1901 on June 22, 2012 at 10:22 AM
I don’t see how any conservative can give HBO money. I cancelled it 11 years ago and never missed it.
juliesa on June 22, 2012 at 10:29 AM
USA has a miniseries coming up called Political Animals. It’s fiction but obviously based on the Clintons. The ads for the series don’t show the protagonists in a flattering light. Might be entertaining.
juliesa on June 22, 2012 at 10:32 AM
At the very end of that Tapper’s piece, he defended News agencies have limited resources. Therefore, they have to pick and choose what to cover (what not to cover).
I was wondering earlier this morning reading his opinion, WHY wouldn’t Libs apply that to national issues?
That we have limited resources, etc etc. Yet Dems/Left think Private Sector provides unlimited check for them to spend.
Sir Napsalot on June 22, 2012 at 10:49 AM
Tapper is about as fair as they get in the MSM. That he’s concerned with liberal bias isn’t proof that anyone else is.
Esthier on June 22, 2012 at 10:58 AM
The funny thing to me is that Tapper’s history would lead one to expect him to be one of the most partisan hacks in the media. I mean Salon, Dem Press Secretary, the Brady gun haters ect. He has done it all and yet he does bother to ask the Obama folks hard questions and often writes pieces his Dem buddies must detest.
I find Tapper a very interesting journalist.
Dawnsblood on June 22, 2012 at 11:48 AM