It’s time for Obama to “evolve” on legalizing marijuana
It is no longer a definite risk to openly criticise the drug war or advocate for marijuana reform. On the contrary, broaching the subject can deliver votes, win elections and increase a politician’s popularity across a broad spectrum of demographics. This is relatively new. But as focus groups still dominate election strategies, politicians remain wary of issues that haven’t been sufficiently tested, regardless of personal conviction. This is not new. When it comes to doing the right thing, or at the very least, favouring facts over fear, it’s strictly a numbers game. An issue isn’t really an issue until the numbers say it is. And even then, said issue remains immaterial until it becomes a proven fact that it will get bodies into the ballot box.
Which is why Colorado is so interesting. A battleground state where Romney and Obama are running dead-even in the polls, the Colorado presidential ballot will also feature a measure asking voters whether or not they support the legalisation of marijuana.
Traditional wisdom would suggest that those who are enticed to the voting booth by a marijuana measure would be naturally inclined towards voting Democrat. But after four years of dispensary raids and a shifting policy landscape that makes Obama’s views on marijuana look outdated and bizarrely conservative, that’s a risky assumption.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Politics aside, it should be legal.
If I can go home and get hammered, I should be able to go home and get high.
RedNewEnglander on June 13, 2012 at 10:24 PM
How ’bout he “evolves” on debt, government spending, energy policy, taxes, illegal immigration, voter fraud………….
Bitter Clinger on June 13, 2012 at 10:24 PM
They are, despite the allegation he did the stuff himself. Being a liberal, you would think he’d at least be open to partial decriminalization.
rickv404 on June 13, 2012 at 10:26 PM
Dinner with Barack and Cheech and Chong.
Rush was laughing earlier today that “Dinner With Barack and Anna Wintour and Sarah Jessica Parker” is such a flop they’ve lowered online contribution eligibility to donating 3 dollars.
Marcus on June 13, 2012 at 10:30 PM
So soon we’ll be able to smoke pot but not have a large soda. God Bless America.
taternuggets on June 13, 2012 at 10:32 PM
Sure, I say go with it.
It worked well in NC, dontchaknow.
So, yeah, definitely go with it!
jersey taxpayer on June 13, 2012 at 10:32 PM
Choom.
Bishop on June 13, 2012 at 10:34 PM
Right. A charter member of the “choom” gang is going to open that pandora’s box?
I think not.
deadrody on June 13, 2012 at 10:37 PM
Obama is a big Pharma guy he will never “evolve” on the issue, he only “evolves” on issues people pay for.
boogaleesnots on June 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM
He’s in such dire straights, he’s going for the Ron Paul vote?
Dude.
Rebar on June 13, 2012 at 10:39 PM
Shroom.
If it failed to pass in liberal California, what are you smoking to think it’s a winning issue?
John the Libertarian on June 13, 2012 at 10:44 PM
Translation. Obama needs something to get his base excited.
The Notorious G.O.P on June 13, 2012 at 10:44 PM
The author, not Bishop.
John the Libertarian on June 13, 2012 at 10:45 PM
Fixed.
thirteen28 on June 13, 2012 at 10:50 PM
Too late for Obama to gain from such a Hail Doobie Pass at this point.
It should have been legal all along, though, like tobacco and alcohol, since a person- in a country founded on the pursuit of happiness and human liberty- wanting to use any of them should be free to.
If you cause trouble under the influence of anything, then the law needs to get involved.
Otherwise, stay out of our lives Nanny Staters.
profitsbeard on June 13, 2012 at 10:50 PM
Here’s the thing…I think people should be able to smoke whatever they want, but they should also be held accountable for the consequences of doing so. Since we live in a society where nothing is ever anyone’s fault, it is always someone else who is liable, then those “someone else’s” have a right to protect their interest.
For example, if an employee comes to work high on drugs and cuts his thumb off in the machine he can sue, AND WIN, his employer for letting him work while stoned/drunk. If people were held responsible for their own actions, you could do away with the drug laws.
The other problem is when your drug use affects the population as a whole. Take the cannible that has recently been in the news. When you take drugs and attack others, steal from them (to support your addiction), etc., the public has the right to protect their interest.
ramrants on June 13, 2012 at 10:53 PM
I just realized I spelled cannibal wrong. Sorry.
ramrants on June 13, 2012 at 10:54 PM
How would he do it?
This could actually get him some senior citizen votes.
Del Dolemonte on June 13, 2012 at 10:58 PM
So basically liberals demand the banning of salt, trans fats, large soft drinks, and cigarettes but are apparently totally cool with legalizing pot.
Mike Honcho on June 13, 2012 at 11:01 PM
Do it.
The smart candidate this year will be the failed executive class warrior, crybaby, socialist, dope-head.
YKIMS.
CorporatePiggy on June 13, 2012 at 11:16 PM
He would have to be polling in the single digits (like 1-2%) to ever change (on anything).
nobar on June 13, 2012 at 11:20 PM
No, he’d just rip the heads off more barbie dolls and wail about how stupid you all are. Racists.
CorporatePiggy on June 13, 2012 at 11:23 PM
So the only crimes you can bust blacks and browns for are crimes that whites commit with the same frequency or higher frequency?
What an insane world. They want to legalize crime for darker skinned people but they can’t just come out and say it.
Buddahpundit on June 13, 2012 at 11:30 PM
How about rolling the dice and advocating the decriminalization of 32-ounce Mountain Dews?
The Enforcer on June 13, 2012 at 11:34 PM
Choom choom.
CherryBombsBigBrownBeaver on June 13, 2012 at 11:45 PM
He admitted he did drugs in his books and in multiple public appearances he admitted he smoked pot. It’s no allegation.
strictnein on June 13, 2012 at 11:54 PM
I pledge to you I will defend your right to have large sodas, to the extent that you defend my right to have marijuana.
JohnGalt23 on June 14, 2012 at 12:10 AM
We need one thing.
A simple easily administered test to show you’re “under the influence” for the purposes of operating a motor vehicle.
That is my only request before legalizing pot… I don’t smoke, I won’t if it’s legal, and I don’t care if you do… but I don’t want you driving high any more than you want me driving after I down a 12-pack.
Fair enough?
gekkobear on June 14, 2012 at 1:59 AM
This country has “evolved” on too many things for its own good. I don’t much care how Obama evolves. He started out as a pot-smoking socialist radical. Where he goes from there doesn’t interest me.
We have a system that has worked well until we started “evolving” it with “progressive” ideas. In evolution, far more mutations result in the death of the organism than enhance its survival. We ought to be more aware of how we’re using the term. Mutation is one thing, but it doesn’t necessarily equal improvement.
flataffect on June 14, 2012 at 2:18 AM
Where are the rest of Obama’s “Choom Gang” today?
Can’t any reporter track them down???
albill on June 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM
Deal. And pass that over here.
taternuggets on June 14, 2012 at 7:51 AM
In my leftist surroundings, people tell me that they oppose the death penalty because it disproportionally affects minorities. What will be the left of their argument when their holy day of racial utopia comes and whites are no longer the majority?
thuja on June 14, 2012 at 8:09 AM
Are we certain about how marijuana affects a brain on a long term basis? If we don’t know, and have intimations that there might be permanent damage especially for young users (check on some of the comments Dr. Sanity has made over the years), I don’t know how I could be good with decriminalizing it.
vityas on June 14, 2012 at 8:13 AM
I here so many conflicting statistics and reports on marijuana I just don’t know anymore. What I do know is I’ll never smoke it, I wouldn’t want my kids to ever smoke it, and I will think less of those who do regardless of its legality or not.
I also foresee all sorts of issues with employers. How will an employer fight a wrongful termination lawsuit when the former employee was fired for being high on the job (by testing positive for it during a drug test as administered by the employer as part of an agreement in the work contract), and the former employee simply claims he smoked at home? Given how long it stays in your system employers won’t be able to know for sure. Imagine how the employer will feel when he is sued for damages caused by an employee who may have been high at the time, but can’t prove it because of legalized recreational use?
Blacksoda on June 14, 2012 at 8:34 AM