Nearly 90% who gave Obama $200 or more in 2008 haven’t donated this time
In 2008, more than 550,000 gave more than $200 to Barack Obama, entering their names in the longest list of individual donors ever seen in American politics.
That list was a snapshot of the hope Obama inspired in a cross sections of liberals, young professionals, African-Americans, and Democrats who saw in him a generational and historic moment. But now, as Obama struggles to keep pace with his 2008 fundraising clip, that list offers a cross-section of Democratic disappointment and alienation. According to a BuzzFeed analysis of campaign finance data, 88% of the people who gave $200 or more in 2008 — 537,806 people — have not yet given that sum this year. And this drop-off isn’t simply an artifact of timing. A full 87% of the people who gave $200 — the sum that triggers an itemized report to the Federal Elections Commission — through April of 2008, 182,078 people, had not contributed by the end of last month.
Interviews with dozens of those drop-off donors reveal the stories of Democrats who still plan to pull the lever for the president, but whose support has gone from fervent to lukewarm, or whose economic circumstances have left them without money to spare. The interviews and the data are the substance of an “enthusiasm gap” spurred by the distance between the promise of the campaign and the reality of governing, one that has begun to deepen Democratic gloom about this November’s election.
“Where’s the change I can believe in?” asked Lisa Pike, a 55-year-old from Williamsburg, Va. with a small medical transcription business who gave $658 in 2008.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
I did receive one in the mail. It did not list my name, but it did list my wife’s name, and we were both incensed. Not only was it inaccurate(it listed her as not having voted in the 2008 election), but I strongly suspect this was an underhanded tactic to tip off other lefties about people in their area who don’t vote, so that they could claim those identities at the ballot box for voter fraud.
MadisonConservative on June 4, 2012 at 9:40 AM
Pic/Cap of the Day: Forward Thinking
http://predicthistunpredictpast.blogspot.com/2012/06/piccap-of-day-forward-thinking.html
Resist We Much on June 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM
Terrible article. Fails to mention the dynamic of a hotly contested primary season in early 2008 vs. uncontested one in 2012. Believe it or not, most Americans haven’t even started to pay attention to the campaign yet. It isn’t until the conventions that most Americans tune in.
AngusMc on June 4, 2012 at 10:01 AM
Who the heck has $200 to spare???
/s
rhbandsp on June 4, 2012 at 10:06 AM
He and his campaign team have no idea how to manage a budget.
It worked out for them in 2008 because the floodgates were open, so they could afford to do crap like buy an entire channel on DirecTV for election season.
This time around, though? They laid out a HUGE footprint on the expectation that they’d get a billion in donations and they aren’t anywhere close, even counting all the DNC money that Obama has appropriated for himself.
I’d say their inability to budget will sink them but, IMHO, NO money advantage would be able to save him as bad as things are. All this money drain will end up doing is hurting the down-ticket races, which should greatly increase the chances of not only taking the Senate but having enough Dems vulnerable in 2014 to severely reduce the number of filibusters.
teke184 on June 4, 2012 at 10:15 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2