John Edwards should not be retried
“In a democracy, it matters what we know about our candidates. We need to know who is influencing them, we need to know where they get their money from, and we need to know how they choose to spend that money,” prosecutor Robert Higdon told jurors in his closing argument.
That is true, yet the sordid Edwards episode was never a good case with which to make this point. In order to find him guilty, the jury would have had to determine beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Edwards acted knowingly and willfully to violate the campaign finance laws. That was always a stretch. The Federal Election Commission (FEC), auditing the Edwards campaign after the revelation of nearly $1 million in payments from heiress Rachel “Bunny” Mellon and the late trial lawyer Fred Baron, did not determine that the payments should have been reported on Mr. Edwards’s campaign filings.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Okay. But he should be re-fried.
Rixon on June 1, 2012 at 2:26 PM
The lefties will run him for president in 2016.
Schadenfreude on June 1, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Have Edwards change his affiliation to Republican and see if they feel the same.
Browncoatone on June 1, 2012 at 2:29 PM
You people are so cruel. After all he’s been though? Johnny deserves a chance at happiness with that alternate juror.
Fallon on June 1, 2012 at 2:30 PM
“Such an injustice that a member of the political ruling class was ever put on trial at all. Such proceedings are for the serfs, not politi-royalty.”
Jeddite on June 1, 2012 at 2:30 PM
From the same paper that convicted George Zimmerman on the basis of his falsely reported skin color.
Stick it up your backside LSM.
Skwor on June 1, 2012 at 2:31 PM
Who owns the sex tape? Edwards or Hunter? You know it’s going to pop up again.
Blake on June 1, 2012 at 2:34 PM
Stopped reading….right….flippin…there…
How dare they. The nerve.
cajun carrot on June 1, 2012 at 3:01 PM
I have to agree that this shouldn’t be prosecuted further. Undoubtedly John Edwards is a scumbag. However, in my mind simply exposing him as such is enough. 30 years potential in prison? Thats more than many murderers and rapists get. That’s just rediculous.
That said the real story here should be about how our media covered this up for him, only to admit they knew about it after a tabloid was able to prove it and more importantly the election was over. We should be calling for reporters who knew about this during the election to be fired for failing to do their jobs. Instead they’ve been given a payday through publishing the info in a book after he had lost the election. Sickening.
FireDrake on June 1, 2012 at 3:33 PM
If they can’t find twelve intelligent jurors, I’d agree.
Ward Cleaver on June 1, 2012 at 3:41 PM
Retried? under the Obama-Holder-DemocRAT DOJ? Gimme a hit off what you’re smokin ..
Face it — they *NEVER* expected a story in the Enquirer would ever grow legs…
/.
CaveatEmpty on June 1, 2012 at 3:52 PM