Insurance executive: ObamaCare has bent the cost curve up, not down
“These mandates have increased our clients’ health plan costs 2 to 3 percent on average to this point,” he said. And he said the costs will escalate further when new rules — such as reductions in waiting periods and the automatic enrollment requirement — take effect in 2014.
Fensholt is a senior vice president of Lockton Companies, LLC, an insurance brokerage and consulting firm that provides employee-benefits expertise to 2,500 mostly middle-market employers.
In addition to the Affordable Care Act’s coverage mandates, Fensholt said a “great frustration” for his clients is the law’s “many additional administrative burdens.”…
“Our clients are already drowning under the cost of provi ding robust health insurance to employees,” Fensholt said. “Rather than tossing employers a lifeline, the Affordable Care Act is in many ways an anchor — albeit a well-intentioned one — by piling on additional costs and burdens.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Whooooooooooooooooo could have seen this coming? Who?
NickDeringer on June 1, 2012 at 2:04 PM
The Devil, you say!
Rixon on June 1, 2012 at 2:04 PM
Insurance consumer: No kidding!?!
Flange on June 1, 2012 at 2:05 PM
Hey, where’s Bart Stupak? Would love Jason Mattera to shove a microphone in his, er, face.
Rixon on June 1, 2012 at 2:05 PM
Get the defibrillator on standby.
Kataklysmic on June 1, 2012 at 2:07 PM
Well-intentioned?
vityas on June 1, 2012 at 2:07 PM
The worst of the mandates haven’t even kicked in yet. It’s bad now, but unless the Supremes kill Obamacare, it’s going to get much, much worse.
AZCoyote on June 1, 2012 at 2:08 PM
Obama’s signature legislation.
a capella on June 1, 2012 at 2:08 PM
Don’t ever call it ObamaCare – call it the ‘Affordable Care Act’ and mock it into oblivion.
Schadenfreude on June 1, 2012 at 2:09 PM
I think “Unaffordable Care Act” is a better mock. Though ObamaDon’tCare pretty much sums it up.
(I know grammatically it is wrong, but considering the grammar skills of those who voted for this bozo..)
ProfShadow on June 1, 2012 at 2:12 PM
frack. consider the, not considering. or add an elipsis before the smiley.
ProfShadow on June 1, 2012 at 2:13 PM
The Cost Curve is spewing blood
faraway on June 1, 2012 at 2:15 PM
ProfShadow on June 1, 2012 at 2:12 PM
Indeed, indeed
Schadenfreude on June 1, 2012 at 2:15 PM
Told. You. So.
ITguy on June 1, 2012 at 2:16 PM
So? The government can just mandate lower prices… du-uh!
logis on June 1, 2012 at 2:18 PM
Who the hell actually believed that you could supply insurance, a Cadillac policy at that, to millions of uninsured and save money? It’s like thinking that out sourcing jobs to China will improve the economy.
DFCtomm on June 1, 2012 at 2:18 PM
But it doesn’t cost anything, it’s FREE!
WeekendAtBernankes on June 1, 2012 at 2:20 PM
Government bureaucracy in a nutshell.
Bitter Clinger on June 1, 2012 at 2:22 PM
And guess what? Since it INCREASES, not decreases outlays, it was never a legitimate candidate for the Byrd “budget reconciliation” rule that they used to pass the House’s “fixes” with less than 60 votes in the Senate.
If not for the pretext that it would save money, they could not have used the Byrd budget reconcilliation rule. They would have needed 60 votes to break a filibuster, rather than needing just 50 + VP votes for reconciliation. After losing “the Kennedy seat” to Scott Brown, the Democrats had only 59 votes for Obamacare in the Senate.
So, the only way they were able to pass Obamacare was with highly deceptive and dishonest accounting, combined with a Senate rule who’s very author (Robert Byrd, before he went senile) said it should NEVER, EVER, be used to pass massive healthcare regulation!
ITguy on June 1, 2012 at 2:22 PM
“But it’s constitutionally ironclad !” – Pelousy
Brat on June 1, 2012 at 2:25 PM
Better yet, call it the OBAMA Affordable Care Act.
Rixon on June 1, 2012 at 2:27 PM
In other news, fire hot, water wet.
BKennedy on June 1, 2012 at 2:37 PM
NOT ONE REPUBLICAN VOTED FOR THIS PILE OF CRAPOLA. NOT ONE.
txhsmom on June 1, 2012 at 2:40 PM
Purple-shirted thugs on Fensholt’s lawn in 3…2…1…
Ward Cleaver on June 1, 2012 at 3:42 PM
I’ll not believe an industry expert. I’ll go w/ what Nancy and Barack say. They’ve read the bill by now, I’m sure.
toenail on June 1, 2012 at 3:51 PM
Give it time to work. We haven’t started denying hip surgery to the old people yet, or telling them to just die with a little dignity, please, when their organs start needing those expensive tweaks.
“Bending the cost curve down” always meant denying people health care. Repeat as necessary until understood.
J.E. Dyer on June 1, 2012 at 3:53 PM