Walter Cronkite’s firing offense
Unbeknownst to the millions who tuned in religiously to the CBS Evening News, Walter Cronkite cut a deal with Pan Am to fly his family to vacation spots around the world. Together with a handful of friends, they roamed from the South Pacific to Haiti, with Cronkite snorkeling, swimming, and drinking, thanks to a friend at the airline. According to Douglas Brinkley’s sweeping and masterful biography Cronkite, the news division president, Dick Salant, was upset at what he deemed a blatant conflict of interest, but took no action against his star anchor…
There were more serious infractions as well. In what would likely be deemed a firing offense today, Cronkite blatantly manipulated an interview with LBJ shortly before Johnson died. According to Brinkley, his producer spliced the footage in unflattering ways, reshooting Cronkite asking the questions so it appeared that he was nodding or raising his eyebrows in disgust when Johnson talked about Vietnam. LBJ saw a rough cut and pronounced it “dirty pool”; I would call it a video version of lying. Under pressure from the former president’s team, CBS undid the misleading editing, so the public never learned of the deception.
It turns out that the most trusted man didn’t always tell the truth. In 1974 Cronkite got into a spat with the rebellious Schorr, flatly denying the charge that CBS executives had ordered the evening news to “go soft on Nixon” as the president was resigning. But Cronkite’s denial was misleading. As Salant later acknowledged, “we in CBS management … telephoned the correspondents who would be covering the story that night to remind them that it was not a time, no matter how any of them felt … for gloating remarks or for editorial attacks.” So Cronkite’s outrage was bogus.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
How many times do you think that has happened since? A dozen times maybe?
slickwillie2001 on May 21, 2012 at 7:52 PM
He’s kidding right? On a day when the WaPo ran a story on a massacre that occurred 150 yrs ago and lamented that it’s not a factor voters are considering about Romney? Really? Meet the old news culture, same as the new news culture.
rcpjr on May 21, 2012 at 7:54 PM
Good lord. And this man has such a good reputation as a good journalist, why?
terryannonline on May 21, 2012 at 7:54 PM
What’s that? Unca Wa Wa was a raging leftist?
You don’t say?
Dack Thrombosis on May 21, 2012 at 7:56 PM
Well the good thing is now we have citizen online “journalists,” if you will, debunking all the crap mainstream journalists sling. We have more options now. I don’t have to get my news from Brian Williams if I don’t want to.
terryannonline on May 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM
Douglas Brinkley is one of the single worst writers of history on the scene today. Anything he says I’d look at suspect not that I am disagreeing with this piece. I am just saying that Brinkley sucks.
Warner Todd Huston on May 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM
Cronkite’s misdeeds stand out because of his fame. I’m sure that he’s not the only anchor to do similar.
OldEnglish on May 21, 2012 at 8:01 PM
Good point. The younger readers here at HotAir (maybe those under 45 or 50) might find it hard to believe that we grew up in a culture where you trusted the Nightly News broadcast.
My Exit question: Yes, there are more options in media now, but do mos people still trust the news sources they visit most often? Or do they apply a more critical eye to any news source, even if it is idealogically aligned with their world view?
Red State State of Mind on May 21, 2012 at 8:04 PM
Cronkite was treated then by the media as Obama was treated in the last election; fortunately, Cronkite had no real power. Cronkite was the leader of the leftist pack who acted as the propaganda arm of North Vietnam. Their monopoly on the major media allowed them to succeed, but today the alternatives would have exposed them. To me, Cronkite is only a small step above Jane Fonda.
FirelandsO3 on May 21, 2012 at 8:09 PM
Two premier a-holes—Cronkite and LBJ. As far as “dirty poo”, LBJ wrote the book.
arnold ziffel on May 21, 2012 at 8:23 PM
Good question. The election of Obama showed that too many people lack critical thinking skills.
I believe that conservatives do not blindly follow sources that they are aligned with and tend to at least weigh who is saying what and context. Libs, no go on logic. It’s all about feelings.
arnold ziffel on May 21, 2012 at 8:29 PM
Intentional?
john1schn on May 21, 2012 at 8:35 PM
I caught it before I posted but thought that will work also.
arnold ziffel on May 21, 2012 at 8:36 PM
Kurtz doesn’t have the intellectual or ethical wherewithal to manage it, but the real expose would be to find a liberal newscaster who isn’t a lying, biased shill for the DNC. Being a lying, biased shill for the DNC, Kurtz is disqualified.
Jaibones on May 21, 2012 at 9:02 PM
I think it was Beck who played a tape of Cronkite talking about how great a one world government would be.
The guy was a nutty leftist.
mockmook on May 21, 2012 at 9:19 PM
Had writhen Wally attempted his treasonous propaganda favoring Hanoi for the Tet Offensive only a few decades earlier he likely would have experienced a long drop on a short rope.
viking01 on May 21, 2012 at 9:41 PM
Cronkite’s most offensive reporting was about the Tet Offensive, and he should have been sacked by CBS after his first report. In my opinion, he should have been tried for treason.
http://www.dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/965/-Cronkites-Offensive-History.aspx
kakypat on May 21, 2012 at 9:44 PM