<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>HotAir</title><link>https://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/05/02/exposing-the-medicare-double-count/feed/</link><description>HotAir is the leading conservative blog for breaking news and commentary covering the Biden administration, politics, media, culture, and current elections.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 05:21:45 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Exposing the Medicare double count</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Perhaps the easiest way to understand this is to look at Social Security. If we generate $1 in savings within that program, then that&amp;#8217;s $1 that Social Security can spend later. If we also claimed this same $1 to finance a new spending program, we would clearly be adding to the total federal deficit. There has long been bipartisan understanding of this aspect of Social Security, which is why Congress&amp;#8217;s paygo rules prohibit using Social Security savings as an offset to pay for unrelated federal spending.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 19:20:29 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Allahpundit]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://hotair.com/headlines/2012/05/02/exposing-the-medicare-double-count-n92147</link></item></channel></rss>