The newest global superpower: Apple
Apple has about 60,000 full-time employees around the world. Apple is a $600 billion company and growing. Nigeria has a population of about 170 million and a GDP less than half Apple’s market capitalization. Such comparisons may seem facile, but they should be made over and over until the full weight sinks in. Apple is not just a cool computer/phone/tablet company. It is an ecosystem and a society with more influence and power than most nations.
Like hundreds of its multinational brethren, Apple also is able to cherry-pick its costs. It can’t control the price of raw materials, but those are only a small portion of its expense. It does, however, have huge latitude in managing its labor costs. The imbroglio over working conditions in Chinese factories that produce Apple products spoke to the larger issue that Apple is so vastly profitable in part because it makes ideas but it does not bear the cost of labor to actually assemble its products. It contracts with labor, which means that the costs of education, of retirement and of health care are borne by someone else, often by governments, sometimes by individual workers not fortunate enough to work for Apple directly…
Apple’s success is the most dramatic symbol of the power of Corporateland. It also highlights the limitations of the stories we tell ourselves. Our national dramas about “the economy” have no place today for Apple and its brethren. Clearly enough people have enough income to spend on these goods and services, and clearly many believe their lives are better for what Apple—or hundreds of other companies—has to offer.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Funny, everyone thought Apple’s earnings were going to be bad and sold off stock in the last few days. Turns out to be the second best quarter ever.
John the Libertarian on April 25, 2012 at 8:52 PM
over prices let alone too expensive… how many shares can a normal person own of apple? The time to buy them has long passed.
I hate apple because more or less the type of people it tends to attract… you know , those where you can have a bag of poo with the apple logo on it and people still would pay an over inflated price for it. That is another reason why I dont like apple… the bang for the buck is wayyyy too much… sorry I am more into performance, and if it means I can get something that does just as well, and cost half as much… I dont need the “cool factor”.
watertown on April 25, 2012 at 9:01 PM
mhhh early for me… overpriced and not over prices.
watertown on April 25, 2012 at 9:02 PM
Comparing market cap to GDP is like comparing networth to yearly income. An apples to apples (hah!) comparison would be Apple at 600 billion, to the USA at 200 Trillion.
CarolinaPunk on April 25, 2012 at 9:12 PM
For a supposed liberal company, they sure are a whites club.
Aplombed on April 25, 2012 at 9:33 PM
http://www.apple.com/pr/bios/
Link.
Aplombed on April 25, 2012 at 9:33 PM
Very intriguing article …though I still have to wonder if Apple would be vulnerable to a world economic collapse.
Unless their vast wealth includes vaults stuffed to the rafters with gold, silver and copper commodities, they are just another corporate house of cards waiting to fall.
The term ‘too big to fail’ readily comes to mind.
The Ugly American on April 25, 2012 at 9:46 PM
http://www.apple.com/pr/bios/Link.
Aplombed on April 25, 2012 at 9:33 PM
MY EYES!!!
LOL……
The Ugly American on April 25, 2012 at 9:47 PM
Oopsie …meant that to be blockquote not strike…
The Ugly American on April 25, 2012 at 9:48 PM
That article is largely true…
Steve Jobs would be prouder than ever if he was still with us.
CorporatePiggy on April 25, 2012 at 10:48 PM
The irony in all this is that whilst Steve Jobs posed as the ultimate liberal, he was a “harder” deal broker than anyone in modern corporate history.
Quite nuts in many ways, but far harder than Bill Gates in commercial terms.
And very very liberal in terms of design philosophy. He created his own extraordinarily successful command and control micro-economy within a capitalist macro-economy.
No mean feat.
Mao and Stalin would have worshiped at his feet.
Bark tried to and his response was, cut regulation and I’ll make it happen here.
No sale.
CorporatePiggy on April 25, 2012 at 10:52 PM