The India/China rivalry
Partly because the India-China rivalry carries nothing like this degree of long-standing passion, it serves the interests of the elite policy community in New Delhi very well. A rivalry with China in and of itself raises the stature of India because China is a great power with which India can now be compared. Indian elites hate when India is hyphenated with Pakistan, a poor and semi-chaotic state; they much prefer to be hyphenated with China. Indian elites can be obsessed with China, even as Chinese elites think much less about India. This is normal. In an unequal rivalry, it is the lesser power that always demonstrates the greater degree of obsession. For instance, Greeks have always been more worried about Turks than Turks have been about Greeks…
Because India’s population will surpass that of China in 2030 or so, even as India’s population will get gray at a slower rate than that of China, India may in relative terms have a brighter future. As inefficient as India’s democratic system is, it does not face a fundamental problem of legitimacy like China’s authoritarian system very well might.
Then there is Tibet. Tibet abuts the Indian subcontinent where India and China are at odds over the Himalayan borderlands. The less control China has over Tibet, the more advantageous the geopolitical situation is for India. The Indians provide a refuge for the Tibetan Dalai Lama. Anti-Chinese manifestations in Tibet inconvenience China and are therefore convenient to India. Were China ever to face a serious insurrection in Tibet, India’s shadow zone of influence would grow measurably. Thus, while China is clearly the greater power, there are favorable possibilities for India in this rivalry.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
India wins.
thebrokenrattle on April 25, 2012 at 7:07 PM
I could be wrong but I think that China has the ability to be ruthless that India lacks. Population and weapons are worthless if you’re not willing to fight to win.
Charlemagne on April 25, 2012 at 7:20 PM
Always?
Tell that to Alexander.
itsnotaboutme on April 25, 2012 at 7:31 PM
These two countries have far more reason to co-operate than to quarrel. There is no significant ideological conflict between them and neither of them are champions of any ideological purity. Nor is there any major territorial dispute between them.
Both countries have legitimate border/security concerns but not much with one-another.
Neighbours France and the United Kingdom both have the capacity to destroy one another, and their respective armed-forces meet in all parts of the globe, but nobody is predicting a shooting war between France and the UK.
Similarly Russia and China share borders and have overlapping interests and each could inflict significant military harm on the other, but they haven’t actually had a war of late.
Why should China and India be any different?
YiZhangZhe on April 25, 2012 at 7:32 PM
India, Tibet, Taiwan, Philippines: all currently being bullied by the red panda.
But the latter three don’t have elites who are enjoying the conflicts.
itsnotaboutme on April 25, 2012 at 7:33 PM