“We needed a cover story and Titanic was the cover story”
Ballard had long been fascinated by Titanic, and always dreamed of finding it. Back in the 1970s, he led a failed expedition to do just that. But it wasn’t until 1985, while serving as a naval intelligence officer, that he was able to secure the technology and funding that helped him finally discover it 1,000 miles due east of Boston. Having helped the U.S. Navy develop unmanned submarines, Ballard thought the technology might be useful in finding the lost ship. The Navy had little interest in funding the search, but it was very interested in finding the USS Scorpion and the USS Thresher, two nuclear submarines that were lost in the 1960s on either side of where the Titanic went down. With the Cold War still in its final throes, the Navy had to keep the true nature of the submarine search a secret. They told Ballard that if he could find the subs, then afterward he could use their technology to search for the ship—but the world would think the expedition was about finding the Titanic from the beginning.
“The Navy didn’t want to disclose the location of those submarines, so we needed a cover story and Titanic was the cover story,” says Ballard. “I wanted to find the Titanic. The Navy just wanted our expedition to deflect from the true mission.”…
Whether because of humans or because of bacteria consuming the ship, there is a good chance Titanic will collapse completely within the next few decades. In the meantime, Ballard is determined to do his part to preserve the ship and prolong her life for as long as possible. He is currently applying for a permit to clean the rust off the hull and give the ship a fresh coat of paint. While the prospect of refurbishing a 100-year-old vessel lying 12,000 feet beneath the sea might seem daunting to anyone else, Ballard isn’t fazed. It’s the same technology they use to repair supertankers that are too big to go into dry dock. “They’ve actually developed underwater robots that are very simple, they have magnets, they attach to the hull and they can travel the length of the hull and clean the rust off. And then they actually have paint that can be applied underwater,” he says.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Underwater painting? Now that I have to see.
keep the change on April 15, 2012 at 7:07 PM
The Obama administration will insist that the robots be unionized.
Yoop on April 15, 2012 at 7:09 PM
Environmentalists will shoot down the underwater painting. An amoeba might get trapped between the paint and the hull and die.
crosspatch on April 15, 2012 at 7:16 PM
Why?
OldEnglish on April 15, 2012 at 7:18 PM
The sub part is neat. I just don’t get the part about preserving the wreck.
Count to 10 on April 15, 2012 at 7:34 PM
1985 eh? I’m pretty sure the US Navy knew exactly where the Scorpion was before that. Especially since I saw pictures of it on the bottom in 1969. Our chief snipe brought them down for us to scope out.
Oldnuke on April 15, 2012 at 7:38 PM
Double meh.
BHO Jonestown on April 15, 2012 at 7:39 PM
This picture of Scorpion was taken in 1968
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b5/USS_Scorpion_%28SSN-589%29%3BU136658.jpg
but wikipedia does say this:
crosspatch on April 15, 2012 at 7:50 PM
Doubtless that what they were really interested in was Scorpion – and all the rumor circling why she was sunk. The pics from the 60′s weren’t really detailed enough to determine why she went down.
There was a whole investigation after Ballard got back – and I know an officer that was on it. He told me in 1989 that Scorpion WAS NOT sunk by a Soviet Sub.
I told him that I still didn’t believe him!
HondaV65 on April 15, 2012 at 7:52 PM
That’s a crappy pic.
The stuff Ballard used in the 80′s was much better resolutionwise and much more useful.
I saw a lot of it.
HondaV65 on April 15, 2012 at 7:53 PM
I like the theory – don’t believe it necessarily but like it – that the “real” story, i.e., looking for the Scorpion/Thresher, is another cover for the actual work which was to tap into undersea Soviet communication cables.
And that the Russians still use the cables so that Ballard can’t reveal what his real mission was.
Sceptical but I do like the multiple layers of intrigue.
SteveMG on April 15, 2012 at 7:57 PM
That Capitalist Climate Disruption really gets around.
BL@KBIRD on April 15, 2012 at 8:31 PM
I’m pretty certain the Russians didn’t do it. Have you ever heard any stories about the test block on the Mark 37 torpedo?
Oldnuke on April 15, 2012 at 8:43 PM
You’re conflating the story of Ballard’s search with Operation Ivy Bells. There are no Soviet undersea cables in the Atlantic, and it would be a tad bit obvious for Ballard’s vessel to show up in the Black Sea or off of Murmansk while claiming to be looking for Titanic.
Ballard’s primary mission was not only to relocate and establish positions for Scorpion and Thresher, but to image them and especially take water and soil samples to test for radiation, the better to judge the state of the reactor containment vessels onboard each vessel.
In addition, Scorpion carried a pair of MK45 Torpedos, which had nuclear warheads. It was important to also test if there had been any leakage from either of these, and water and soil tests would easily determine that.
V/R
TKindred on April 15, 2012 at 9:34 PM
Concur.
However, there are a couple of folks who have books to sell, and need publicity to push their conspiracy theories, so they’ll be pimping the “Soviet Payback” meme for as long as possible to all sorts of gullible types.
TKindred on April 15, 2012 at 9:36 PM
Well, I’m agnostic as to where the cables would be located but, as I said, it’s a theory I recently read and didn’t take seriously.
As to the radiation tests: I’m not sure that Ballard’s equipment would be needed to measure radiation leakage? Hasn’t that been done regularly since the sinking and before Ballard’s expedition?
SteveMG on April 15, 2012 at 9:55 PM